Multicentre, propensity-matched study to evaluate long-term impact of implantation technique in isolated aortic valve replacement on mortality and incidence of redo surgery

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 599-605

  Haqzad, Yama ^a   Loubani, Mahmoud ^a   Chaudhry, Mubarak ^a   Ariyaratnam, Priyadharshanan ^a   Briffa, Norman ^b  

^a CASTLE HILL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Aortic valve surgery; Interrupted suture; Redo aortic valve replacement; Reoperation; Semicontinuous suture; Surgical techniques

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERRUPTED SUTURE TECHNIQUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; RESTENOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMICONTINUOUS SUTURE TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; VERY ELDERLY; WOUND DEHISCENCE; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; SURVIVAL RATE; SUTURE TECHNIQUE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84964939476     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivw015     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Baron-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;42:S1-44.
2. Ruchat P, Hurni M, Fischer AP, Sadeghi H. Semicontinuous suture technique for all prosthetic valve insertions: the hoist technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:859-60.
3. Qicai H, Zili C, Zhengfu H, Weiming Z, Zhoumiao C, Dingsheng Y et al. Continuous-suture technique in aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2006;21:178-81.
4. Nair SK, Bhatnagar G, Valencia O, Chandrasekaran V. Effect of valve suture technique on incidence of paraprosthetic regurgitation and 10-year survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:1171-9.
5. Englberger L, Schaff H, Jamieson E, Kennard E, Im K, Holubkov R et al. Importance of implant technique on risk of major paravalvular leak (PVL) after St. Jude mechanical heart valve replacement: a report from the Artificial Valve Endocarditis reduction Trial (AVERT). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:838-44.
6. Hyelms E, Vilhemsen R, Rygg T. Continuous suture technique in prosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg 1982;23:145-8.
7. Laks H, Pearl JM, Barthei SW, Elami A, Sorensen TJ, Milgalter E. Aortic valve replacement using a continuous suture technique. J Card Surg 1993;8:459-65.
8. Kannel WB, Levy D, Cupples LA. Left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of cardiac failure: insights from the Framingham Study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987;10(Suppl 6):S135-40.
9. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: the evidence continues to accumulate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:952-5.
10. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with pre-existing left ventricular dysfunction: impact on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1036-44.
11. D Onofrio A, Mazzucco A, Valfrè C, Zussa C, Martinelli L, Casabona R et al. Left ventricular remodeling, hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Pericarbon Freedom stentless bioprosthesis: results from the Italian ProspectiveMulticenter Trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2011;20:531-9.
12. González-Juanatey JR, García-Acuña JM, Fernandez MV, Cendón AA, Fuentes VC, García-Bengoechea JB et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implication for surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:273-80.
13. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, Birkmeyer NJ, Lemmer JH Jr, Miller DC et al. Prosthesis size and long-Term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:783-96.
14. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-4.
15. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesispatient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-41.
16. Watanabe G, Ushijima T, Tomita S, Yamaguchi S, Koshida Y, Iino K. Revival of continuous suture technique in aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis: a novel modified technique. Innovations (Phila) 2011;6:311-5.
17. Ricchi A, Ross DN. A continuous suture technique for mechanical or bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Surg 1996;11: 68-70.