Preference for flavored noncombustible nicotine products among smokers motivated to switch from cigarettes

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 892-893

  Meier, Ellen ^a   Vogel, Rachel Isaksson ^b   O'Connor, Richard J ^c   Severson, Herb H ^d   Shields, Peter G ^e   Hatsukami, Dorothy K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLAVORED NONCOMBUSTIBLE NICOTINE PRODUCT; NICOTINE DERIVATIVE; NICOTINE GUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAUCASIAN; CIGARETTE SWITCH; CIGARETTES PER DAY; CINNAMON FLAVOR; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRUIT FLAVOR; HUMAN; LETTER; MALE; MINT FLAVOR; MOTIVATION; NON MENTHOL CIGARETTE; ONSET AGE; PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SMOKELESS TOBACCO; SMOKING; SMOKING AND SMOKING RELATED PHENOMENA;

EID: 84964925979     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv259     Document Type: Letter

References (11)

1. U.S. Congress. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. In: Congress US, ed. H.R. 1256 Vol Public Law 111-31. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office; 2009.
2. Timberlake DS, Pechmann C, Tran SY, Au V. A content analysis of Camel Snus advertisements in print media. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(6):431-439. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21385907. Accessed November 30, 2009.
3. Melikian AA, Hoffmann D. Smokeless tobacco: a gateway to smoking or a way away from smoking. Biomarkers. 2009;14(suppl 1):85-89. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19604066. Accessed November 30, 2009.
4. Oliver AJ, Jensen JA, Vogel RI, Anderson AJ, Hatsukami DK. Flavored and nonflavored smokeless tobacco products: rate, pattern of use, and effects. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(1):88-92. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 22529222. Accessed November 30, 2009.
5. Brandon TH, Goniewicz ML, Hanna NH, et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a policy statement from the American Association for Cancer Research and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(8):952-963. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25572671.Accessed November 30, 2009.
6. Foulds J, Ramstrom L, Burke M, Fagerstrom K. Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tob Control. 2003;12(4):349-359. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14660766. Accessed November 30, 2009.
7. Hatsukami DK, Severson H, Anderson A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of snus vs. medicinal nicotine among smokers interested in product switching. Tob Control. 2015. In Review.
8. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119-1127. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citatio n&list_uids=1932883. Accessed November 30, 2009.
9. Feirman SP, Lock D, Cohen JE, Holtgrave DR, Li T. Flavored tobacco products in the United States: a systematic review assessing use and attitudes [published online ahead of print August 26, 2015]. Nicotine Tob Res. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv176.
10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes. 2013. www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/ PeerReviewofScientificInformationandAssessments/UCM361598.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2009.
11. Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD, Pearson JL. Switching to e-cigarettes in the event of a menthol cigarette ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1286-1287. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634935. Accessed November 30, 2009.