Are cure rates for breast cancer improved by local and regional anesthesia?

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 339-347

  Tsigonis, Abraham M ^a   Al Hamadani, Mohammed ^a   Linebarger, Jared H ^a,b   Vang, Choua A ^a   Krause, Forrest J ^b   Johnson, Jeanne M ^a,b   Marchese, Edward ^a   Marcou, Kristen A ^b   Hudak, Jane M ^b   Landercasper, Jeffrey ^a,b  

^a GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Gundersen Health System   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORMONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CAUSE OF DEATH; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEDATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; VERY ELDERLY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REMISSION; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR RECURRENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, CONDUCTION; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REMISSION INDUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84964903904     PISSN: 10987339     EISSN: 15328651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000379     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/breast-cancer-facts-figures. Accessed January 14, 2015.
2. Neumayer L, Schifftner TL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, El-Tamer M,. Breast cancer surgery in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 1235-1241.
3. Heaney A, Buggy DJ,. Can anaesthetic and analgesic techniques affect cancer recurrence or metastasis? Br J Anaesthesia. 2012; 109 (suppl 1): i17-i28.
4. Cata JP, Hernandez M, Lewis VO, Kurz A,. Can regional anesthesia and analgesia prolong cancer survival after orthopaedic oncology surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1434-1441.
5. Buggy DJ, Borgeat A, Cata J, Consensus statement from the BJA Workshop on Cancer and Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015; 114: 2-3.
6. Buggy DJ, Hemmings HC,. Special issue on anaesthesia and cancer. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 113 (suppl 1): i1-i3.
7. Chen WK, Miao CH,. The effect of anesthetic technique on survival in human cancers: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e56540.
8. Tavare AN, Perry NJ, Benzonana LL, Takata M, Ma D,. Cancer recurrence after surgery: direct and indirect effects of anesthetic agents. Int J Cancer. 2012; 130: 1237-1250.
9. Bortsov AV, Millikan RC, Belfer I, Boortz-Marx RL, Arora H, McLean SA,. μ-Opioid receptor gene A118G polymorphism predicts survival in patients with breast cancer. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 896-902.
10. Mao L, Lin S, Lin J,. The effects of anesthetics on tumor progression. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2013; 5: 1-10.
11. Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI,. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006; 105: 660-664.
12. Deegan CA, Murray D, Doran P, Anesthetic technique and the cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase response to primary breast cancer surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35: 490-495.
13. Benzonana LL, Perry NJ, Watts HR, Isoflurane, a commonly used volatile anesthetic, enhances renal cancer growth and malignant potential via the hypoxia-inducible factor cellular signaling pathway in vitro. Anesthesiology. 2013; 119: 593-605.
14. Sessler DI, Ben-Eliyahu S, Mascha EJ, Parat MO, Buggy DJ,. Can regional analgesia reduce the risk of recurrence after breast cancer? Methodology of a multicenter randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008; 29: 517-526.
15. U.S. National Institutes of Health: ClinicalTrials.gov. Regional anesthesia and breast cancer recurrence. Updated January 25, 2013. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00418457. Accessed February 1, 2015.
16. Commission on Cancer accreditation of tumor registry. Available at: http://ncdbpuf.facs.org/sites/default/files/NCDB%20Participant%20Use%20File%202012-0.pdfOutcomes. Accessed August 12, 2015.
17. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 2nd. AHRQ Publication 10-EHC049. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
18. Kitowski NJ, Landercasper J, Gundrum JD, Local and paravertebral block anesthesia for outpatient elective breast cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2010; 145: 592-594.
19. Najarian MM, Johnson JM, Landercasper J, Havlik P, Lambert PJ, McCarthy D,. Paravertebral block: an alternative to general anesthesia in breast cancer surgery. Am Surg. 2003; 69: 213-218.
20. Linebarger JH, Landercasper J, Ellis RL, Core needle biopsy rate for new cancer diagnosis in an interdisciplinary breast center: evaluation of quality of care 2007-2008. Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 3-43.
21. Greengrass R, O'Brien F, Lyerly K, Paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43: 858-861.
22. Radford MJ, Foody JM,. How do observational studies expand the evidence base for therapy? JAMA. 2001; 286: 1228-1230.
23. Austin PC,. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011; 46: 119-151.
24. Garrido MM, Kelly AS, Julia P, Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49: 1701-1720.
25. Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR,. Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150: 327-333.
26. Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Improved postoperative pain control using thoracic paravertebral block for breast operations. Breast J. 2009; 15: 483-438.
27. Boughey JC, Goravanchi F, Parris RN, Prospective randomized trial of paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 2009; 198: 720-725.
28. Fahy AS, Jakub JW, Dy BM, Paravertebral blocks in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction provides improved pain control and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 213: 284-289.
29. Andreae MH, Andreae DA,. Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 111: 711-720.
30. Wu J, Buggy D, Fleischmann E, Thoracic paravertebral regional anesthesia improves analgesia after breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015; 62: 241-251.
31. Coveney E, Weltz CR, Greengrass R, Use of paravertebral block anesthesia in the surgical management of breast cancer: experience in 156 cases. Ann Surg. 1998; 227: 496-501.
32. Mamounas EP, Tang G, Liu Q,. The importance of systemic therapy in minimizing local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: the NSABP experience. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110: 45-50.