Physiopucks: Increasing user motivation by combining tangible and implicit physiological interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Cincuegrani, S Mealla ^a   Jorda S ^a   Valjamae A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c TALLINN UNIVERSITY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Brain computer interfaces; Brain tangible user interface; Computer supported cooperative work; Human computer interaction; Implicit interaction; Multimodal interfaces; Musical collaboration; Physiological computing; Physiopucks; Tabletops

Indexed keywords

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; USER INTERFACES;

IMPLICIT INTERACTION; MULTI-MODAL INTERFACES; MUSICAL COLLABORATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL COMPUTING; PHYSIOPUCKS; TABLETOPS; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84964893631     PISSN: 10730516     EISSN: 15577325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2838732     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J. Allanson and S. Fairclough. 2004. A research agenda for physiological computing. Interacting with Computers 16, 5, 857-878. DOI:10.1016/j.intcom.2004.08.001
2. D. Afergan, E. M. Peck, E. T. Solovey, A. Jenkins, S. W. Hincks, E. T. Brown, et al. 2014. Dynamic difficulty using brain metrics of workload. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). ACM, 3797-3806.
3. S. Bermudez i Badia, A. Valjamae, F. Manzi, U. Bernardet, A. Mura, J. Manzolli, et al. 2009. The effects of explicit and implicit interaction on user experiences in a mixed reality installation: The synthetic oracle. The effects of explicit and implicit interaction on user experiences in a mixed reality installation: The synthetic oracle 18, 277-285.
4. M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 1, 49-59. DOI:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
5. B. Caramiaux, M. Donnarumma, and A. Tanaka. 2015. Understanding gesture expressivity through muscle sensing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 21, 6, 31.
6. A. H. Eagly and S. Chaiken. 1998. Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, 269-322.
7. S. H. Fairclough, K. Gilleade, L. E. Nacke, and R. L. Mandryk. 2011. Brain and body interfaces: Designing for meaningful interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11), Extended Abstracts Volume. ACM, 65-68.
8. B. Graimann, B. Allison, and G. Pfurtscheller (Eds.). 2010. Brain-computer Interfaces. Springer Science & Business Media, 1-28. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-02091-9
9. S. W. Greenhouse and S. Geisser. 1959. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24, 2, 95-112.
10. T. Hermann and G. Baier. 2013. Sonification of the human EEG. In Sonic Interaction Design. K. Franinović and S. Serafin, (Ed.). MIT Press.
11. T. Hermann, T. Bovermann, E. Riedenklau, and H. Ritter. 2007. Tangible computing for interactive sonification of multivariate data. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Interactive Sonification.
12. D. C. Howell. 2010. Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (7th ed.). Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove.
13. E. Hudlicka. 2003. To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 1-2, 1-32. DOI:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00047-8
14. A. Jones and K. Issroff. 2005. Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education 44, 4, 395-408. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004
15. ∗. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME'03).
16. S. Jordà. 2008. On stage: The reactable and other musical tangibles go real. Arts and Technology 1, 3/4, 268-287.
17. M. Kaltenbrunner and R. Bencina. 2007. reacTIVision: A computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. ACM, 69-74.
18. N. P. Lago and F. Kon. 2004. The quest for low latency. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. 33-36.
19. S. Mealla, A. Väljamäe, M. Bosi, and S. Jorda. 2011. Listening to your brain: Implicit interaction in collaborative music performances. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME'11).
20. S. Mealla, A. Oliveira, X. Marimon, T. Steffert, Jorda S., and Väljamäe, A. 2014. The role of personalization and multiple EEG and sound features. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems (PhyCS'14).
21. S. Mealla Cincuegrani. 2015. Designing Sonic Interactions for Implicit Physiological Computing. Ph.D. dissertation. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
22. A. Nijholt and H. Gürkök. 2013. "Multi-brain games: Cooperation and competition." 652-661.
23. P. Peltonen, E. Kurvinen, A. Salovaara, G. Jacucci, T. Ilmonen, and J. Evans, et al. 2008. It's mine, don't touch!: Interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1285-1294.
24. M. Puckette. 1996. Pure data: Another integrated computer music environment. In Proceedings of the Second Intercollege Computer Music Concerts. Tachikawa, 37-41.
25. J. Serra, E. Gómez, and P. Herrera. 2010. Audio Cover Song Identification and Similarity: Background, Approaches, Evaluation, and Beyond. Z. W. Raś and A. A. Wieczorkowska (Eds.). Vol. 274. Springer, Berlin, 307-332. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-11674-2
26. R. H. Stevens and T. L. Galloway. 2014. Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams. Social Neuroscience 9, 2, 160-173. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.883324
27. P. Tikka, A. Valjamae, A. de Borst, R. Pugliese, N. Ravaja, M. Kaipainen, et al. 2012. Enactive cinema paves the way for understanding complex real time social interaction in neuroimaging experiments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, 298.
28. A. Väljamäe, S. Mealla, T. Steffert, S. Holland, X. Marimon, R. Benitez, A. Oliveira, and S. Jorda. 2013. A review of real-time EEG sonification research. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Auditory Displays (ICAD'13).
29. Y. Wang and T.-P. Jung. 2011. A collaborative brain-computer interface for improving human performance. PLoS ONE 6, 5, e20422. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0020422
30. R. E. Wheeler, R. J. Davidson, and A. J. Tomarken. 1993. Psychophysiology 30, 82-89.
31. D. Wessel and M. Wright. 2002. Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Computer Music Journal 26, 3, 11-22.
32. J. R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D. J. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, and T. M. Vaughan. 2002. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology 113, 6, 767-791.
33. B. F. Yuksel, D. Afergan, E. M. Peck, G. Griffin, L. Harrison, N. W. Chen, et al. 2015. BRAAHMS: A novel adaptive musical interface based on users' cognitive state. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME'15). Louisiana State University, 136-139.
34. T. O. Zander and C. Kothe. 2011. Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: Applying brain-computer interface technology to human machine systems in general. Journal of Neural Engineering 8, 2, 025005.
35. T. O. Zander and S. Jatzev. 2009. Detecting affective covert user states with passive brain-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops. IEEE. 1-9.
36. T. Zander, C. Kothe, S. Jatzev, and M. Gaertner. 2010. Enhancing human-computer interaction with input from active and passive brain-computer interfaces. In Brain-Computer Interfaces. Springer, 181-199.