An abstract model of gentrification as a spatially contagious succession process

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 59, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-10

  Liu, Cheng ^a,b   O'Sullivan, David ^c  

^a Shenzhen Institute of Building Research Co Ltd LTD   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based model; Cellular automata; Filtering; Gentrification; Household life cycle; Rent gap

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ECONOMICS; FILTRATION; LIFE CYCLE; ROBOTS; SIMULATION PLATFORM; URBAN GROWTH;

ABSTRACT MODELING; AGENT-BASED MODEL; FILTERING THEORY; GENTRIFICATION; LIFE CYCLE THEORIES; RENT GAP; SUPPLY AND DEMAND; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMAND ANALYSIS; GENTRIFICATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RENTAL SECTOR; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84964820201     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alperovich G. The baby boom, the baby bust and the housing market: A further look at the debate. The Annals of Regional Science 1995, 29(1):111-116.
2. Anselin L. The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. Paper presented at the Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS: GISDATA 4 1996.
3. Arnott R., Davidson R., Pines D. Housing quality, maintenance and rehabilitation. The Review of Economic Studies 1983, 50(3):467-494.
4. Badcock B. An Australian view of the rent gap hypothesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1989, 79(1):125-145.
5. Bourassa S.C. The rent gap debunked. Urban Studies 1993, 30(10):1731-1744.
6. Bridge G. A global gentrifier class?. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(1):32-46.
7. Butler T., Robson G. London calling: The middle classes and the remaking of inner London 2003, Berg, London.
8. Clark E. The rent gap and transformation of the built environment: Case studies in Malmö 1860-1985. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 1988, 70(2):241-254.
9. Cleveland W.S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979, 74(368):829-836.
10. Diappi L., Bolchi P. Smith's rent gap theory and local real estate dynamics: A multi-agent model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2008, 32(1):6-18.
11. Engelhardt G.V., Poterba J.M. House prices and demographic change: Canadian evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1991, 21(4):539-546.
12. Fontaine C., Rounsevell M. An agent-based approach to model future residential pressure on a regional landscape. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24(9):1237-1254.
13. Fox J. Nonparametric simple regression: Smoothing scatterplots 2000, SAGE Publications.
14. Galster G. William Grigsby and the analysis of housing sub-markets and filtering. Urban Studies 1996, 33(10):1797-1805.
15. Glass R. London: Aspects of change 1964, MacGibbon & Kee, London.
16. Gober P. Urban housing demography. Progress in Human Geography 1992, 16(2):171-189.
17. Gray F., Boddy M. The origins and use of theory in urban geography: Household mobility and filtering theory. Geoforum 1979, 10(1):117-127.
18. Green R., Hendershott P.H. Age, housing demand, and real house prices. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1996, 26(5):465-480.
19. Hackworth J. Postrecession gentrification in New York City. Urban Affairs Review 2002, 37(6):815-843.
20. Hamilton B.W. The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market: A second look. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1991, 21(4):547-552.
21. Hammel D.J. Gentrification and land rent: A historical view of the rent gap in Minneapolis. Urban Geography 1999, 20(2):116-145.
22. Hammel D.J. Re-establishing the rent gap: An alternative view of capitalised land rent. Urban Studies 1999, 36(8):1283-1293.
23. Hamnett C. The blind men and the elephant: The explanation of gentrification. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1991, 16(2):173-189.
24. Hamnett C. Gentrification and the middle-class remaking of inner London, 1961-2001. Urban Studies 2003, 40(12):2401-2426.
25. Holland A.S. The baby boom and the housing market: Another look at the evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1991, 21(4):565-571.
26. Hoyt H. The structure and growth of residential neighbourhoods in American cities 1939, Federal Housing Administration, Washington, DC.
27. Jones C. Household movement, filtering and trading up within the owner occupied sector. Regional Studies 1978, 12(5):551-561.
28. Kristof F.S. Federal housing policies: Subsidized production, filtration and objectives: Part I. Land Economics 1972, 48(4):309-320.
29. Kutty N.K. A dynamic model of landlord reinvestment behavior. Journal of Urban Economics 1995, 37(2):212-237.
30. Lees L., Slater T., Wyly E. Gentrification 2008, Routledge, New York.
31. Levin E., Montagnoli A., Wright R.E. Demographic change and the housing market: Evidence from a comparison of Scotland and England. Urban Studies 2009, 46(1):27-43.
32. Ley D. The new middle class and the remaking of the central city 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Lowry I.S. Filtering and housing standards: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 1960, 36(4):362-370.
34. Mankiw N.G., Weil D.N. The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1989, 19(2):235-258.
35. Mehlhorn D. A requiem for blockbusting: Law, economics, and race-based real estate speculation. Fordham Law Review 1998, 67(3):1145-1192.
36. Muth R.F. Cities and housing: The spatial pattern of urban residential land use Chicago 1969, University of Chicago Press, Il.
37. Myers D. Housing allowances, submarket relationships and the filtering process. Urban Affairs Review 1975, 11(2):215-240.
38. Myers D., Ryu S. Aging baby boomers and the generational housing bubble: Foresight and mitigation of an epic transition. Journal of the American Planning Association 2008, 74(1):17-33.
39. Nijkamp P., Van Wissen L., Rima A. A household life cycle model for residential relocation behaviour. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 1993, 27(1):35-53.
40. O'Sullivan D. Toward micro-scale spatial modeling of gentrification. Journal of Geographical Systems 2002, 4(3):251-274.
41. O'Sullivan D., Perry G.L.W. Spatial simulation: Exploring pattern and process 2013, Wiley-Blackwell.
42. O'Sullivan D., Unwin D. Geographic information analysis 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. 2nd ed.
43. Pacione M. Urban geography: A global perspective 2005, Routledge, New York. 2nd ed.
44. Pitkin J. Housing consumption of the elderly: A cohort economic model. Housing demography 1990, 174-199. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. D. Myers (Ed.).
45. Pitkin J., Myers D. The specification of demographic effects on housing demand: Avoiding the age-cohort fallacy. Journal of Housing Economics 1994, 3(3):240-250.
46. Redfern P.A. What makes gentrification 'gentrification'?. Urban Studies 2003, 40(12):2351-2366.
47. Rofe M.W. 'I want to be global': theorising the gentrifying class as an emergent elite global community. Urban Studies 2003, 40(12):2511-2526.
48. Rossi P.H. Why families move 1980, Sage Publications. 2 ed.
49. Semboloni F. Segregation and gentrification as emerging phenomena from the real estate market. Paper presented at the 48th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Liverpool 2008.
50. Smith N. Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association 1979, 45(4):538-548.
51. Smith N. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city 1996, Routledge, London and New York.
52. Swan C. Demography and the demand for housing: A reinterpretation of the Mankiw-Weil demand variable. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1995, 25(1):41-58.
53. Sýkora L. City in transition: The role of rent gaps in prague's revitalization. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 1993, 84(4):281-293.
54. Torrens P. Can geocomputation Save Urban Simulation? Throw Some Agents Into the Mixture, Simmer and Wait (Vol. Working Paper series: Publication 32) 2001, University College of London, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis.
55. Torrens P. A geographic automata model of residential mobility. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2007, 34(2):200-222.
56. Tsang S.W., Leung Y. A theory-based Cellular Automata for the simulation of land-use change. Geographical Analysis 2011, 43(2):142-171.
57. Woodward S.E. Economists' prejudices: rthe Mankiw-Weil story is not credible. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1991, 21(4):531-537.
58. Wu F. Simulating temporal fluctuations of real estate development in a Cellular Automata city. Transactions in GIS 2003, 7(2):193-210.
59. Zukin S. The cultures of cities 1995, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.