Capturing user requirements and priorities for innovative interactive systems

Proceedings - 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 1998

Volumn 1998-November, Issue , 1998, Pages 160-167

  Dearden, Andy ^a   Howard, Steve ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL TECHNIQUES; INCREMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS; INNOVATIVE PRODUCT; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD); SCENARIO-BASED DESIGN; SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84964722906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732210     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Checkland, P, 1981. Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester, England.
2. Checkland, P & Scholes, J, 1990. Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, Chichester, England.
3. Patching, D. 1990. Practical soft systems analysis. Pitman. London, England.
4. Akao, Y. (editor) 1990. Quality Function Deployment: Integrating customer requirements into design. Productivity Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
5. Cohen. L, 1995. Quality Function Deployment-how to make QFD work for you. Addison-Wesley, New York.
6. Nardi, B. (ed.), 1996. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K., (1997). Contextual Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California.
8. Carroll, J.M. & Rosson, M.B., 1992. Getting Around the Task-Artefact Cycle: How to Make Claims and Design by Scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 10(2), pp. 181-212.
9. Rosson, M.B. & Carroll, J.M. 1995, Narrowing the Specification-Implementation Gap in Scenario-Based Design. Ch. 10 in Carroll, 1995, pp 247-278.
10. Monk, A. & Howard, S. 1998. The Rich Picture: A tool for reasoning about work contexts. Interactions 5(2), 21-30.
11. Dearden, A.M. & Wright, P.C, 1997. Experiences in using situated and non-situated techniques for studying work in context. In, S. Howard, J. Hammond & G. Lindgaard (eds.) Human Computer Interaction, Interact '97, pp. 429-436 Chapman-Hall. London.
12. Newman, W. 1997. Better or just different? On the benefits of designing interactive systems in terms of critical parameters. In Proceedings of DIS '97, Designing Interactive System. ACM Press, New York.
13. Carroll, J.M. (ed.), 1995. Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York.
14. Kyng, M. 1995. Creating Contexts for Design. Ch. 4 in Carroll 1995, pp 85-108.
15. Kuutti, K 1995. Work Processes: Scenarios as a Preliminary Vocabulary. Ch. 1 in Carroll 1995, pp 19-36.
16. Erickson, T, 1995. Notes on Design Practice: Stories and Prototypes as Catalysts for Communication. Ch.2 in Carroll 1995, pp 37-58.
17. Karat, J. 1995. Scenario Use in the Design of a Speech Recognition System. Ch. 5 in Carroll, 1995, pp. 109-134.
18. MacLean, A. & McKerlie, D. Design Space Analysis and Use Representations. Ch. 8 in Carroll, 1995, pp. 183-208.