Testing in the field

Proceedings - 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction, APCHI 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 285-290

  Nielsen, Christina ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LABORATORIES; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

CONTEXT OF USE; DANISH INDUSTRY; FIELD WORKS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84964719863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/APCHI.1998.704437     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bardram, Jakob E. : The Role of Workplace Studies in Design of CSCW systems: From Passive 'Implications for Design' to Active, Cooperative Design. In Proceeding of the 19th IRIS Conference, 1996.
2. Black, A. & Buur, J. (1996) Making solid user interfaces work. Information design journal 8 (2): 99-108.
3. Buur, J., Bagger, K. & Binder, T. (no date) Turning usability testing into user dialogue, draft, Danfoss.
4. Bødker, S. & Grønbæk, K. (1991). Cooperative Prototyping: Users and Designers in Mutual Activity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, Special Issue on CSCW. Also in Greenberg, S. (Ed.) Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware, Academic Press, pp. 331-359, London 1991.
5. Bødker, S. (1991). Through the Interface-a Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bødker, S. (1993). Historical analysis and conflicting perspectives-contextualizing HCI. In Bass, L., Gornostaev, J., Unger, C. Human-Computer interaction. 3rd International Conference, EWHCI '93, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 753, pp. 1-10.
7. Bødker, S. (1996). Applying activity theory to video analysis: How to make sense of video data in HCI, in Nardi, B. (ed.) Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human computer interaction, MIT press, pp. 147-174.
8. Bødker, S. & Christiansen, E. (in press). Scenarios as springboards in design. In Bowker, G., Gasser, L., Star, S. L. & Turner, W. (Eds.), Social science research, technical systems and cooperative work. Erlbaum.
9. Grunnet, C. & Skak, A. (1996): Drama in Design, Applying Improvisation in Product Design (Unpublished report). Institute of Dramaturgy, Århus University, Århus Denmark; and Man-machine Interaction Group, Danfoss, Nordborg Denmark.
10. Hughes, J. Randall, D & Shapiro D. (1993). From ethnographic record to system design: Some experiences from the field. In: CSCW: An International Journal, vol. 1 no. USA.
11. Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995): Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1): 39-103.
12. Mackay, W. (1989): Video as a Research and Design Tool. Special issue ofthe SIGCHI Bulletin, Vol. 21: 2.
13. Mackay, W. (1995): Ethics, Lies and Videotape. CHI'95 Proceedings: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Mosaic of Creativity, Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 138-145.
14. Madsen, K. H. (1996): Initiative in Participatory Design. In Blomberg, J., Kensing, F. & Dykstra-Erickson: PDC '96, Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. Palo Alto, USA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (223-230).
15. Mogensen, P. (1992) Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 31-53.