Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2015, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Sandall, Jane ^a   Soltani, Hora ^b   Gates, Simon ^c   Shennan, Andrew ^d   Devane, Declan ^e  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ANTEPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FETUS WASTAGE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LABOR; LACERATION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MATERNAL CARE; MIDWIFE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NEWBORN DEATH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VAGINAL DELIVERY; AMNION; ECONOMICS; EPISIOTOMY; INFANT; META ANALYSIS; NEWBORN; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERINATAL CARE; POSTNATAL CARE; PRENATAL CARE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SURGERY; UTILIZATION;

AMNION; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MIDWIFERY; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERINATAL CARE; POSTNATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84964693414     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Allen J, Stapleton H, Tracy S, Kildea S. Is a randomised controlled trial of a maternity care intervention for pregnant adolescents possible? An Australian feasibility study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13:138.
2. Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, McCann C, Hughes P, Reilly M, et al. Comparison of Midwife-led and Consultantled Care of Healthy Women at Low Risk of Childbirth Complications in the Republic of Ireland: a Randomised Trial [thesis]. Trinity College, University of Dublin, 2011.
3. Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, McCann C, Hughes P, Reilly M, et al. Comparison of midwife-led and consultantled care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2011;11:85.
4. Biro MA, Waldenstrom U, Brown S, Pannifex JH. Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low-and highrisk women: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 2003;30 (1):1-10.
5. Biro MA, Waldenstrom U, Pannifex JH. Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 2000;27(3):168-73.
6. Flint C. Know your midwife. Nursing Times 1988;84: 28-32.
7. Flint C, Poulengeris P, Grant AM. The 'Know your midwife' scheme-a randomised trial of continuity of care by a team of midwives. Midwifery 1989;5:11-6.
8. Flint C, Poulengeris, P. The 'Know your Midwife' Report. London: Heinemann, 1987.
9. Harvey S, Jarrell J, Brant R, Stainton C, Rach D. A randomized, controlled trial of nurse-midwifery care. Birth 1996;23:128-35.
10. Harvey S, Rach D, Stainton MC, Jarrell J, Brant R. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery 2002;18(4):260-7.
11. Hicks C, Spurgeon P, Barwell F. Changing childbirth: a pilot project. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2003;42(6): 617-28.
12. Homer C. Incorporating cultural diversity in randomised controlled trials in midwifery. Midwifery 2000;16:252-9.
13. Homer C, Davis G, Brodie P, Sheehan A, Barclay L, Wills J, et al. Collaboration in maternity care: a randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2001;108:16-22.
14. Homer CS, Davis GK, Brodie PM. What do women feel about community-based antenatal care?. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2000;24:590-5.
15. Homer CS, Davis GK, Cooke M, Barclay LM. Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia. Midwifery 2002;18(2):102-12.
16. Homer CS, Matha DV, Jordan LG, Wills J, Davis GK. Community-based continuity of midwifery care versus standard hospital care: a cost analysis. Australian Health Review 2001;24(1):85-93.
17. Kenny P, Brodie P, Eckerman S, Hall J. Final Report. Westmead Hospital Team Midwifery Project Evaluation. Sydney: University of Sydney, 1994.
18. MacVicar J, Dobbie G, Owen-Johnstone L, Jagger C, Hopkins M, Kennedy J. Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;100:316-23.
19. Davey M, McLachlan H, Forster D. Timing of admission and selected aspects of intrapartum care: Relationship with caesarean section in the COSMOS (Caseload Midwifery) trial. Women & Birth 2013;26(Suppl 1):S3.
20. Davey MA, McLachlan L, Forster D, Flood M. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial). Midwifery 2013;29(12):1297-302.
21. Flood M, Forster DA, Davey MA, McLachlan HL. Serious adverse event monitoring in a RCT of caseload midwifery (COSMOS). Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2012; 48(Suppl 1):113.
22. McLachan H. A randomised trial comparing one-to-one midwifery care with standard hospital maternity care for women at low risk, in order to decrease operative birth and other interventions and increase the duration of breastfeeding and women's satisfaction with care, with no increase in costs of care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www.anzctr.org.au) (accessed 19 February 2008).
23. McLachlan H, Forster D, Davey M-A, Gold L, Biro MA, Flood M, et al. The effect of caseload midwifery on women's experience of labour and birth: Results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. Women & Birth 2013;26(Suppl 1):S13.
24. McLachlan H, Forster D, DaveyMA. The effect of caseload midwifery on women's experience of labour and birth: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. International Confederation of Midwives 30th Triennial Congress. Midwives: Improving Women's Health; 2014 June 1-4; Prague, Czech Republic. 2014:C085.
25. McLachlan H, Forster D, Davey MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Oats J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS)-primary and secondary outcomes. Women and Birth 2011;24 Suppl 1:S13.
26. McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Biro MA, et al. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: The COSMOS randomised controlled trial. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2012;119(12):1483-92.
27. McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Oats J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS): Maternal and infant outcomes. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2011;47(Suppl 1):33.
28. McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Farrell T, Gold L, Waldenstrom U, et al. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS): Women's satisfaction with care. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2012;48(Suppl 1): 41-2.
29. McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Davey MA, Lumley J, Farrell T, Oats J, et al. Cosmos: comparing standard maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008;8:35.
30. North Staffordshire Changing Childbirth Research Team. A randomised study of midwifery caseload care and traditional 'shared-care'. Midwifery 2000;16:295-302.
31. Rowley MJ, Hensley MJ, Brinsmead MW, Wlodarczyk JH. Continuity of care by a midwife team vs routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial. Medical Journal of Australia 1995;163:289-93.
32. Hartz D, Hall B, Allen J, Lainchbury A, Forti A, Kildea S, et al. The MatNGO Trial: Does caseload midwifery reduce caesarean section operation rates?. Women & Birth 2013;26 (Suppl 1):S8-9.
33. Hartz D, Tracy SK, Foureur M. Does caseload midwifery reduce casarean section rates. International Confederation of Midwives 30th Triennial Congress. Midwives: Improving Women's Health; 2014 June 1-4; Prague, Czech Republic. 2014:C086.
34. Hartz DL, Tracy S, Kildea S, Tracy M, Foureur M, Hall B, et al. Does caseload midwifery reduce caesarean section operation rates: The matngo trial. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2012;48(Suppl 1):27.
35. Tracy K, Hartz L, Tracy B, Allen J, Forti A, Hall B, et al. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: MatNGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382(9906):1723-32.
36. Tracy SK. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www.anzctr.org.au) (accessed 31 July 2009) 2009.
37. Tracy SK, Hartz D, Hall B, Allen J, Forti A, Lainchbury A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: MatNGO (Midwives at New Group practice Options). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2011;11:82.
38. Cheyne H, McGinley M, Turnbull D, Holmes A, Shields N, Greer I, et al. Midwife managed care: results of a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 1996;1(Suppl 1):129.
39. Holmes A, McGinley M, Turnbull D, Shields N, Hillan E. A consumer driven quality assurance model for midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery 1996;4(10):512-8.
40. McGinley M, Turnbull D, Fyvie H, Johnstone I, MacLennan B. Midwifery development unit at Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital. British Journal of Midwifery 1995;3(7):362-71.
41. Shields N, Holmes A, Cheyne H. Knowing your midwife in labour. British Journal of Midwifery 1995;7(8):504-10.
42. Shields N, Reid M, Cheyne H, Holmes A, McGinley M, Turnbull D, et al. Impact of midwife-managed care in the postnatal period: an exploration of psychosocial outcomes. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 1997;15: 91-108.
43. Shields N, Turnbull D, Reid M, Holmes A, Cheyne H, McGinley M, et al. Satisfaction with midwife-managed care in different time periods: a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Midwifery 1998;14:85-93.
44. Shields N, Turnbull D, Reid M, Holmes A, Cheyne H, McGinley M, et al. Women's satisfaction and continuity of care with midwife managed care. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 1996;1(1):320.
45. Turnbull D, Holmes A, Cheyne H, Shields N, McGinley M, McIlwaine G, et al. Does midwife-led care work? The results of a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. 27th British Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 1995 July 4-7; Dublin, Ireland. 1995:527.
46. Turnbull D, Holmes A, Shields N, Cheyne H, Twaddle S, Harper Gilmour W, et al. Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care. Lancet 1996;348:213-8.
47. Turnbull D, McGinley M, Fyvie M, Johnstone IEA. Implementation and evaluation of a midwifery development unit. British Journal of Midwifery 1995;3(9):465-8.
48. Turnbull D, Reid M, McGinley M, Shields N. Changes in midwife attitudes to their professional role following implementation of the midwifery development unit. Midwifery 1995;11(3):110-9.
49. Turnbull D, Shields N, McGinley M, Holmes A, Cheyne H, Reid M, et al. Professional issues: can midwife-managed units improve continuity of care?. British Journal of Midwifery 1999;7(8):499-503.
50. Young D, Lees A, Twaddle S. The costs to the NHS of maternity care: midwife-managed vs shared. British Journal of Midwifery 1997;5(8):465-72.
51. Young D, Shields N, Holmes A, Turnbull D, Twaddle S. Aspects of antenatal care. A new style of midwife-managed antenatal care: costs and satisfaction. British Journal of Midwifery 1997;5:540-5.
52. Waldenstrom U, Brown S, McLachlan H, Forster D, Brennecke S. Does team midwife care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care? A randomized controlled trial. Birth 2000;27(3):156-67.
53. Waldenstrom U, McLachlan H, Forster D, Brennecke S, Brown S. Team midwife care: maternal and infant outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2001;41(3):257-64.
54. Berglund A, Lindmark GC. Health services effects of a reduced routine programme for antenatal care. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1998;77(2):193-9.
55. Berglund A, Lindberg M, Nystrom L, Lindmark G. Combining the perspectives of midwives and doctors improves risk assessment in early pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2007;86(2):177-84.
56. Berglund A, Lindmark G. Midwife managed care-impact on use of health services: and area-based randomised controlled trial. XVI FIGO World Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Book 4); 2000 Sept 3-8; Washington DC, USA. 2000:116.
57. Bernitz S, Aas E, Oian P. Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwifeled birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 2012;28(5):591-9.
58. Bernitz S, Rolland R, Blix E, Jacobsen M, Sjoborg K, Oian P. Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2011;118(11):1357-64.
59. Bernitz S, Rolland R, Blix E, Jacobsen M, Sjoborg K, Oian PL. Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on birth care level? A randomised controlled trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2012;91 (Suppl 159):45-6.
60. Chambliss L, Daly C, Medearis AL, Ames M, Turnquist R, Kayne M, et al. Significant differences in cesarean birth rates for resident physician and nurse midwife services are the result of selection criteria. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;164:313.
61. Chambliss LR, Daly C, Medearis AL, Ames M, Kayne M, Paul R. The role of selection bias in comparing cesarean birth rates between physician and midwifery management. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;80(2):161-5.
62. Chapman MG, Jones M, Spring JE, De Swiet M, Chamberlain GVP. The use of a birthroom: a randomized controlled trial comparing delivery with that in the labour ward. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;93: 182-7.
63. Famuyide A. OB Nest; redefining continuity of care for expectant mothers. ClinicalTrials.gov (http:// clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 24 March 2014] 2014.
64. Giles W, Collins J, Ong F, MacDonald R. Antenatal care of low risk obstetric patients by midwives. A randomized controlled trial. Medical Journal of Australia 1992;157: 158-61.
65. Gu C, Wu X, Ding Y, Zhu X, Zhang Z. The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives' antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2013;50(12): 1689-97.
66. Heins HC, Nance NW, McCarthy BJ, Efird CM. A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1990;75:341-5.
67. Hildingsson I, Waldenstrom U, Radestad I. Swedish women's interest in home birth and in-hospital birth center care. Birth 3003;30(1):11-22.
68. Hundley VA, Cruickshank FM, Lang GD, Glazener CMA, Milne JM, Turner M, et al. Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care. BMJ 1994;309:1400-4.
69. Hundley VA, Cruickshank FM, Milne JM, Glazener CMA, Lang GD, Turner M, et al. Satisfaction and continuity of care: staff views of care in a midwife-managed delivery unit. Midwifery 1995;11:163-73.
70. Hundley VA, Donaldson C, Lang GD, Cruickshank FM, Glazener CMA, Milne JM, et al. Costs of intrapartum care in a midwife managed delivery unit and a consultant led labour ward. Midwifery 1995;11:103-9.
71. James DK. A comparison of a schematic approach to antenatal care and conventional shared care. Personal communication 1988.
72. Kelly J. Comparison of two different methods of delivering antenatal care, one with components provided by an obstetrician, the other by a midwife. Personal communication 1986.
73. Klein M, Papageorgiou AN, Westreich R, Spector-Dunsky L, Elkins V, Kramer MS, et al. Care in a birth room vs a conventional setting: a controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1984;131:1461-6.
74. Law YY, Lam KY. A randomized controlled trial comparing midwife-managed care and obstetrician-managed care for women assessed to be at low risk in the initial intrapartum period. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Research 1999; 25:107-12.
75. MarksMN, Siddle K,Warwick C. Can we prevent postnatal depression? A randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of continuity of midwifery care on rates of postnatal depression in high-risk women. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2003;13:119-27.
76. Runnerstrom L. The effectiveness of nurse-midwifery in a supervised hospital environment. Bulletin of the American College of Midwives 1969;14:40-52.
77. Slome C, Wetherbee H, Daly M, Christensen K, Meglen M, Thiede H. Effectiveness of certified nurse-midwives. A prospective evaluation study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1976;124:177-82.
78. Stevens A. A randomised controlled trial of community antenatal care in central Birmingham. Personal communication 1988.
79. Ratcliffe J, Ryan M, Tucker J. The costs of alternative types of routine antenatal care for low-risk women: shared care vs care by general practitioners and community midwives. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy 1996;1:135-40.
80. Tucker JS, Hall MH, Howie PW, Reid ME, Barbour RS, Florey CD, et al. Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians. BMJ 1996;312:554-9.
81. Waldenstrom U, Nilsson CA. A randomized controlled study of birth center care versus standard maternity care: effects on women's health. Birth 1997;24(1):17-26.
82. Waldenstrom U, Nilsson CA. Experience of childbirth in birth center care: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1994;73:547-54.
83. Waldenstrom U, Nilsson CA. No effect of birth centre care on either duration or experience of breast feeding, but more complications: findings from a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery 1994;10:8-17.
84. Waldenstrom U, Nilsson CA. Women's satisfaction with birth center care: a randomized, controlled study. Birth 1993;20(1):3-13.
85. Waldenstrom U, Nilsson CA, Winbladh B. The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1997;104(4): 410-8.
86. Walker D, Demaria L, Gonzalez-Hernandez D, Padron-Salas A, Romero-Alvarez M, Suarez L. Are all skilled birth attendants created equal? A cluster randomised controlled study of non-physician based obstetric care in primary health care clinics in Mexico. Midwifery 2013;29(10): 1199-205.
87. Walker DM, DeMaria L, Suarez L, Gonzales D, Romero M, Padron A. Are all skilled birth attendants created equal? evidence from mexico. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2012;119(Suppl 3):S516-S517.
88. Nagle C, Skouteris H, Hotchin A, Bruce L, Patterson D, Teale G. Continuity of midwifery care and gestational weight gain in obese women: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2011;11:174.
89. Anderson R. New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions. BMJ 2008;337:a1937.
90. Ashcroft B, Elstein M, Boreham N, Holm S. Prospective semistructured observational study to identify risk attributable to staff deployment, training, and updating opportunities for midwives. BMJ 2003;327(7415):584.
91. Benjamin Y,Walsh D, Taub N. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes. Midwifery 2001;17(3): 234-40.
92. Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, Linsell L, Macfarlane A, McCourt C, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011;343:d7400.
93. Cook RI, Render M, Woods DD. Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. BMJ 2000;320:791-4.
94. De Vries R, Benoit C, Van Teijlingen E, Wrede S. Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care and Midwifery in North America and Northern Europe. New York: Routledge, 2001.
95. Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M, Horey D, OBoyle C. Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures. Birth 2007;34(2):164-72.
96. Flint C, Poulengeris P. The 'Know your Midwife' Report. London: Heinemann, 1987.
97. Freeman GK, Woloshynowych M, Baker R, Boulton M, Guthrie B, Car J, et al. Continuity of Care 2006: What Have We Learned Since 2000 and What are Policy Imperatives Now? Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO). London: NCCSDO, 2007.
98. McMaster University. GRADEpro. [Computer program on www.gradepro.org]. Version 2015. McMaster University, 2014.
99. Green J, Renfrew M, Curtis PA. Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence. Midwifery 2000;16:186-96.
100. Guthrie B, Saultz JW, Freeman GK, Haggerty JL. Continuity of care matters. BMJ 2008;337(a867):00.
101. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ.Continuity of care: amultidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003;327(7425):1219-21.
102. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
103. Hodnett ED. Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD000062]
104. Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub4]
105. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687.
106. Johnson M, Stewart H, Langdon R, Kelly P, Yong L. A comparison of the outcomes of partnership caseload midwifery and standard hospital care in low risk mothers. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005;22(3):21-7.
107. McCourt C, Stevens S, Sandall J, Brodie P. Working with women: developing continuity in practice. In: Page LA, McCandlish R editor(s). The New Midwifery. 2nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone, 2006:141-66.
108. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Cooper C, et al. Process evaluation in complexpublic health intervention studies: the need for guidance. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2014;68(2):101-2.
109. Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000352.pub2]
110. Rayment-Jones H, Murrells T, Sandall J. An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data--a retrospective, observational study. Midwifery 2015;31(4):409-17.
111. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, 2001. [ISBN 1-900364-66-2.]
112. Reid RJ,Haggerty JL,Mckendry R. Defusing the confusion: concepts and measures of continuity of health care. Report to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation 2002.
113. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
114. Rooks JP. The midwifery model of care. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 1999;44(4):370-4.
115. Ryan P, Revill P, Devane D, Normand C. An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led care in the United Kingdom. Midwifery 2013;29(4):368-76.
116. Sandall J, Davies J, Warwick C. Evaluation of the Albany Midwifery Practice: Final Report. London: King's College, London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, 2001.
117. Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Annals of Family Medicine 2003;1(3):134-43.
118. Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Annals of Family Medicine 2004;2(5):445-51.
119. Saultz JW, Lochner J. Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Annals of Family Medicine 2005;3(2):159-66.
120. Schunemann HJ. GRADE: from grading the evidence to developing recommendations. A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice [GRADE: Von der Evidenz zur Empfehlung. Beschreibung des Systems und Losungsbeitrag zur Ubertragbarkeit von Studienergebnissen]. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen 2009;103(6):391-400. [PUBMED: 19839216]
121. Sutcliffe K, Caird J, Kavanagh J, Rees R, Oliver K, Dickson K, et al. Comparing midwife-led and doctor-led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2012;68(11):2376-86.
122. ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, Downe S, Fauveau V, Fogstad H, et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet Special Issue 2014;384(9949):1226-35.
123. UNFPA. The State of the World's Midwifery 2014, A Universal Pathway, A Woman's Right to Health. UNFPA 2014.
124. Waldenstrom U, Turnbull D. A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1998;105:1160-70.
125. Walsh D, Devane D. A metasynthesis of midwife-led care. Qualitative Health Research 2012;22(7):897-910.
126. Young D, Lees A, Twaddle S. The costs to the NHS of maternity care: midwife-managed vs shared. British Journal of Midwifery 1997;5(8):465-72. References to other published versions of this review
127. Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H, Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2]
128. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD004667.pub3]