메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 92-93, Issue , 2016, Pages 553-555

Assuring high-quality evidence reviews for chemical risk assessment: Five lessons from guest editing the first environmental health journal special issue dedicated to systematic review

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLICATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EID: 84964685710     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.016     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (11)

References (5)
  • 1
    • 84991012373 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for Authors.
    • (accessed 10 April 2016)
    • Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. Guidelines for Authors.., 2016 (accessed 10 April 2016) http://www.environmentalevidence.org/information-for-authors.
    • (2016)
  • 2
    • 85027927335 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review of differential inorganic arsenic exposure in minority, low-income, and indigenous populations in the United States.
    • (pii: S0160-4120(16)30011-3 [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26896853) Feb 18
    • Joca, L., Sacks, J.D., Moore, D., Lee, J.S., Sams, R. 2nd, Cowden, J., Systematic review of differential inorganic arsenic exposure in minority, low-income, and indigenous populations in the United States. Environ. Int., 2016 Feb 18, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.011 (pii: S0160-4120(16)30011-3 [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26896853).
    • (2016) Environ. Int.
    • Joca, L.1    Sacks, J.D.2    Moore, D.3    Lee, J.S.4    Sams, R.5    Cowden, J.6
  • 3
    • 84990220385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methodological expectations of cochrane intervention reviews (MECIR) standards for the conduct (version 2.2) and reporting (version 1.1) of new cochrane intervention reviews.
    • (accessed 6 April 2016)
    • MECIR, Methodological expectations of cochrane intervention reviews (MECIR) standards for the conduct (version 2.2) and reporting (version 1.1) of new cochrane intervention reviews.., 2012 (accessed 6 April 2016) http://www.editorial-unit.cochrane.org/mecir.
    • (2012)
    • MECIR1
  • 4
    • 68049122102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
    • e1000097, Group
    • GroupMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., P.R.I.S.M.A., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med., 6(7), 2009, e1000097, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
    • (2009) PLoS Med. , vol.6 , Issue.7
    • Moher, D.1    Liberati, A.2    Tetzlaff, J.3    Altman, D.G.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.