Commitment to Cutting-Edge Research with Rigor and Replication in Psychophysiological Science

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 102, Issue , 2016, Pages ix-x

  Larson, Michael J ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964671912     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8760(16)30038-1     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Button, K.S., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B.A., Flint, J., Robinson, E.S.J., Munafo, M., 2013. Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365-376.
2. Chambers, C.D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R.D., Rotshtein, P., Willmes, K., 2015. Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex 66, A1-A2.
3. Cohen, M.X., 2016. Rigor and replication in time-frequency analyses of cognitive electrophysiology data. Int. J. Psychophysiol. in press.
4. Open Science Collaboration, 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349 aac4716-aac4716.
5. Davis-Stober, C.P., Dana, J., 2014. Comparing the accuracy of experimental estimates to guessing: a new perspective on replication and the "Crisis of Confidence" in psychology. Behav. Res. Methods 46, 1-14.
6. Gelman, A., Loken, E., 2014. The statistical crisis in science. Am. Sci. 102, 460-465.
7. Ioannidis, J.P.A., 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2, e124.
8. Larson, M.J., Carbine, K.A.,. Sample Size Calculations in Human Electrophysiology (EEG and ERP) Studies: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Increased Rigor. Int. J. Psychophysiol. under review.
9. Lenth, R.V., 2001. Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination. Am. Stat. 55, 187-193.
10. Lindsay, D.S., 2015. Replication in psychological science. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1827-1832.
11. Nosek, B.A., Alter, G., Banks, G.C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S.D., Breckler, S.J., Buck, S., Chambers, C.D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D.P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., Ishiyama, J., Karlan, D., Kraut, A., Lupia, A., Mabry, P., Madon, T.A., Malhotra, N., Mayo-Wilson, E., McNutt, M., Miguel, E., Paluck, E.L., Simonsohn, U., Soderberg, C., Spellman, B.A., Turitto, J., VandenBos, G., Vazire, S., Wagenmakers, E.J., Wilson, R., Yarkoni, T., 2015. SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS Promoting an open research culture. Science 348, 1422-1425.
12. Simmons, J.P., Nelson, L.D., Simonsohn, U., 2011. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1359-1366.
13. Simons, D.J., Holcombe, A.O., Spellman, B.A., 2014. An Introduction to Registered Replication Reports at Perspectives on Psychological Science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 552-555.
14. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1971. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychol. Bull. 76, 105-110.