Economic Evaluation Plan (EEP) for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT): An international trial to compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of commencing out of bed standing and walking training (very early mobilization) within 24 h of stroke onset with usual stroke unit care

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 492-494

  Sheppard, Lauren ^a,b   Dewey, Helen ^c   Bernhardt, Julie ^b   Collier, Janice M ^b   Ellery, Fiona ^b   Churilov, Leonid ^b   Tay Teo, Kiu ^a   Wu, Olivia ^d   Moodie, Marj ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; HUMAN; MALAYSIA; MOBILIZATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEW ZEALAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANKIN SCALE; SINGAPORE; STROKE UNIT; UNITED KINGDOM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY AMBULATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 84964662049     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1747493016632254     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. The AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 46-55.
2. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Collier J, et al. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT). Int J Stroke 2006; 1: 169-171.
3. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, et al. A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for stroke (AVERT): phase II safety and feasibility. Stroke 2008; 39: 390-396.
4. Tay-Teo K, Moodie M, Bernhardt J, et al. Economic evaluation alongside a phase II, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of very early rehabilitation after stroke (AVERT). Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26: 475-481.
5. Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Dewey H, et al. Statistical analysis plan (SAP) for A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT): an international trial to determine the efficacy and safety of commencing out of bed standing and walking training (very early mobilization) within 24 h of stroke onset vs. usual stroke unit care. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 23-24.
6. Fowler RA, Mittmann N, Geerts WH, et al. Economic evaluation of the prophylaxis for thromboembolism in critical care trial (E-PROTECT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 502.
7. Khowaja AR, Mitton C, Bryan S, et al. Economic evaluation of community level interventions for pre-eclampsia (CLIP) in South Asian and African countries: a study protocol. Implement Sci 2015; 10: 76.
8. Ride J, Rowe H, Wynter K, et al. Protocol for economic evaluation alongside a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention for the primary prevention of postnatal mental health problems in first-time mothers. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e006226.
9. Udsen FW, Lilholt PH, Hejlesen O, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 178.
10. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ 2013; 346: f1049.