A geographical and multi-criteria vulnerability assessment of transportation networks against extreme earthquakes

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 153, Issue , 2016, Pages 39-49

  Kermanshah, A ^a   Derrible, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Extreme earthquake; GIS analysis; Robustness; Transportation networks; Vulnerability surface

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOPHYSICS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; ROADS AND STREETS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SEISMOLOGY; TRANSPORTATION;

BETWEENNESS CENTRALITY; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; GEOGRAPHY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GIS ANALYSIS; SEVERE EARTHQUAKES; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; VULNERABILITY INDICATORS;

EARTHQUAKES;

EID: 84964627262     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. S. Lohr The age of big data 2012 N Y Times 11
2. A. McAfee, E. Brynjolfsson, T.H. Davenport, D. Patil, and D. Barton Big data: the management revolution Harv Bus Rev 90 2012 61 67
3. Villars, RL, Olofson, CW, Eastwood, M. Big data: what it is and why you should care. White paper, IDC: 2011.
4. Wald DJ, Worden BC, Quitoriano V, Pankow KL. ShakeMap manual: technical manual, user's guide, and software guide: 2005.
5. L. Bevere, B. Rogers, B. Grollimund, and T. Hess Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2010: A year of devastating and costly events 2011 National Emergency Training Center Zurich, Switzerland
6. E. Paté-Cornell On "Black Swans" and "Perfect Storms": risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough Risk Anal 32 2012 1823 1833
7. S. Derrible, and C. Kennedy Applications of graph theory and network science to transit network design Transp Rev 31 2011 495 519
8. S. Derrible, and C. Kennedy Characterizing metro networks: state, form, and structure Transportation 37 2010 275 297
9. S. Derrible Metros as biological systems: complexity in small real-life networks M. Dehmer, A. Mowshowitz, F. Emmert-Streib, Adv. Netw. Complex 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim, Germany 259 285
10. S. Derrible, and C. Kennedy Network analysis of world subway systems using updated graph theory Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2112 2009 17 25 10.3141/2112-03
11. R. Faturechi, and E. Miller-Hooks Measuring the performance of transportation infrastructure systems in disasters: A comprehensive review J Infrastruct Syst 21 2014 04014025
12. S. Derrible, and C. Kennedy The complexity and robustness of metro networks Phys Stat Mech Appl 389 2010 3678 3691
13. Basöz N, Kiremidjian A. A bridge prioritization method based on transportation system performance using GIS: 1995, p. 437-49.
14. H. Wakabayashi, and H. Kameda Network performance of highway systems under earthquake effects: A case study of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake 1992 Public Works Research Institute Japan 215 232
15. S.E. Chang Transportation planning for disasters: An accessibility approach Environ Plan A 35 2003 1051 1072
16. J.-G. Koenig Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application Transportation 9 1980 145 172
17. A. Kermanshah, and S.A. Derrible GIS method for measuring road system resilience to extreme events 2015 Nara Japan
18. A. Kermanshah, A. Karduni, F. Peiravian, and S. Derrible Impact analysis of extreme events on flows in spatial networks 2014 IEEE 29 34
19. Wisetjindawat W, Ito H, Fujita M. Integrating a stochastic failure of the road network and a road recovery strategy into the planning of goods distribution in the aftermath of a large-scale earthquake: 2015.
20. G. Csardi, and T. Nepusz The igraph software package for complex network research Int J Complex Syst 1695 2006 1 9
21. K. Berdica An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done Transp Policy 9 2002 117 127
22. N.N. Taleb The black swan:: the impact of the highly improbable fragility 2010 Random House
23. S.E. Chang, and N. Nojima Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective Transp Res Part Policy Pract 35 2001 475 494
24. D.J. Rosenkrantz, S. Goel, S. Ravi, and J. Gangolly Structure-based resilience metrics for service-oriented networks Dependable Comput.-EDCC 5 2005 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg 345 362
25. D.M. Scott, D.C. Novak, L. Aultman-Hall, and F. Guo Network robustness index: A new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks J Transp Geogr 14 2006 215 227
26. G. Leu, H. Abbass, and N. Curtis Resilience of ground transportation networks: A case study on Melbourne 2010
27. E. Jenelius, T. Petersen, and L.-G. Mattsson Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis Transp Res Part Policy Pract 40 2006 537 560
28. D. Henry, and J.E. Ramirez-Marquez Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99 2012 114 122
29. D.D. Woods Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2015
30. M. Snelder Designing robust road networks: A general design method applied to the Netherlands 2010 Delft University of Technology TU Delft
31. H. McCullough Earthquake damage to transportation systems 1994 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder, Colorado, USA
32. US Census Bureau. TIGER Products 2013. (http://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger.html) (accessed 25.05.15).
33. K.V. Steinbrugge, S.T. Algermissen, H. Lagorio, L.S. Cluff, and H. Degenkolb Metropolitan San Francisco and Los Angeles earthquake loss studies: 1980 assessment 1981 Geological Survey U.S.
34. A. Donnellan, L. Grant Ludwig, J.W. Parker, J.B. Rundle, J. Wang, M. Pierce, and et al. Potential for a large earthquake near Los Angeles inferred from the 2014 La Habra earthquake Earth Space Sci 2015
35. T.L. Davis, J. Namson, and R.F. Yerkes A cross section of the Los Angeles area: Seismically active fold and thrust belt, the 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake, and earthquake hazard J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978-2012) 94 1989 9644 9664
36. D.J. Wald, V. Quitoriano, C.B. Worden, M. Hopper, and J.W. Dewey USGS "Did you feel it?" internet-based macroseismic intensity maps Ann Geophys 2012 54
37. Shakemap schollywood-m6.7-se n.d. (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/sc/shake/hollywood-m6.7-se/) (accessed 2.07.15).
38. Shakemap ushaywiredm7.05-se n.d. (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/shakemap/global/shake/haywiredm7.05-se/) (accessed 2.07.15).
39. C. Worden, M. Gerstenberger, D. Rhoades, and D. Wald Probabilistic relationships between ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in California Bull Seismol Soc Am 102 2012 204 221
40. L.C. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification Soc Netw 1 1979 215 239
41. Y. Duan, and F. Lu Structural robustness of city road networks based on community Comput Environ Urban Syst 41 2013 75 87
42. S. Derrible Network Centrality of Metro Systems PLoS One 7 2012 e40575 10.1371/journal.pone.0040575
43. S.P. Borgatti Centrality and AIDS Connections 18 1995 112 114
44. S. Jones Accessibility measures: A literature review 1981
45. M. Kwan Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures Prof Geogr 51 1999 210 227
46. B. Spear Improving employment data for transportation planning 140 2011 Camb Syst Inc Camb MA
47. K. Boussauw, T. Neutens, and F. Witlox Relationship between spatial proximity and travel-to-work distance: the effect of the compact city Reg Stud 46 2012 687 706
48. R. Cervero, and M. Duncan Which reduces vehicle travel more: jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? J Am Plan Assoc 72 2006 475 490
49. S. Sultana Job/housing imbalance and commuting time in the Atlanta metropolitan area: exploration of causes of longer commuting time Urban Geogr 23 2002 728 749
50. B.P. Loo, and A.S. Chow Jobs-housing balance in an era of population decentralization: An analytical framework and a case study J Transp Geogr 19 2011 552 562
51. M.W. Horner, and D. Schleith Analyzing temporal changes in land-use-transportation relationships: A LEHD-based approach Appl Geogr 35 2012 491 498
52. M.H. Salas-Olmedo, and S. Nogués Analysis of commuting needs using graph theory and census data: A comparison between two medium-sized cities in the UK Appl Geogr 35 2012 132 141
53. H.J. Miller, and S.-L. Shaw Geographic information systems for transportation: principles and applications 2001 Oxford University Press New York, US
54. C. Layman, and M. Horner Comparing methods for measuring excess commuting and jobs-housing balance: empirical analysis of land use changes Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2010 110 117
55. M.W. Horner A multi-scale analysis of urban form and commuting change in a small metropolitan area (1990-2000) Ann Reg Sci 41 2007 315 332
56. R. Francis, and B. Bekera A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121 2014 90 103