Preregister if you want to

American Psychologist

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 238-239

  Moore, Don A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

False positives; Hypothesis testing; Open science; Pre registration; Selective reporting

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENCE;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENCE;

EID: 84964375905     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0040195     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Bohannon, J., Koch, D., Homm, P., & Driehaus, A. (2015). Chocolate with high cocoa content as a weight-loss accelerator. International Archives of Medicine, 8 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3823/1654
2. Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345 1502-1505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
3. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2 196-217. http://dx.doi .org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
4. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86 638-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-2909.86.3.638
5. Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2013). P-Curve: A key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 534-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033242