Evaluating uncertainties in multi-layer soil moisture estimation with support vector machines and ensemble Kalman filtering

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 538, Issue , 2016, Pages 243-255

  Liu, Di ^a,b   Mishra, Ashok K ^a   Yu, Zhongbo ^b  

^a AMRL   (United States)

^b HOHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Data assimilation; Dual ensemble Kalman filter; Soil moisture estimation; Support vector machines; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

COST FUNCTIONS; KALMAN FILTERS; MOISTURE; SOIL MOISTURE; SOILS;

DATA ASSIMILATION; DRY AND WET SPELLS; ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER; ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTERING; REGULARIZATION PARAMETERS; ROOT ZONE SOIL MOISTURES; SOIL MOISTURE ESTIMATION; UNCERTAINTY;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

DATA ASSIMILATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; KALMAN FILTER; MAGNITUDE; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL DEPTH; SOIL MOISTURE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84964330060     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Al-Hamdan O.Z., Cruise J.F. Soil moisture profile development from surface observations by principle of maximum entropy. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2010, 15:327-337.
2. Boni G., Entekhabi D., Castelli F. Land data assimilation with satellite measurements for the estimation of surface energy balance components and surface control on evaporation. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37:1713-1722.
3. Castelli F., Entekhabi D., Caporali E. Estimation of surface heat flux and an index of soil moisture using adjoint-state surface energy balance. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35:3115-3126.
4. Clark M.P., Rupp D.E., Woods R.A., et al. Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model. Adv. Water Resour. 2008, 31:1309-1324.
5. Cook B.I., Bonan G., Levis S. Soil moisture feedbacks to precipitation in southern Africa. J. Clim. 2006, 19:4198-4206.
6. Das N., Entekhabi D., Njoku E. Algorithm for merging SMAP radiometer and radar data for high resolution soil moisture retrieval. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011, 49:1504-1512.
7. Das N.N., Mohanty B.P. Root zone soil moisture assessment using remote sensing and vadose zone modeling. Vadose Zone J. 2006, 5:296-309.
8. De Brabanter K., De Brabanter J., Suykens J.A.K., et al. Approximate confidence and prediction intervals for least squares support vector regression. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2010, 22:110-120.
9. Dronova I., Gong P., Wang L., et al. Mapping dynamic cover types in a large seasonally flooded wetland using extended principal component analysis and object-based classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 158:193-206.
10. Dumedah G., Coulibaly P. Evolutionary assimilation of streamflow in distributed hydrologic modeling using in-situ soil moisture data. Adv. Water Resour. 2012, 53:231-241.
11. Entekhabi D., et al. The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98:704-716.
12. Evensen G. The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn. 2003, 53:343-367.
13. Gill M.K., Asefa T., Kemblowski M.W., et al. Soil moisture prediction using support vector machines. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2006, 42:1033-1046.
14. Gill M.K., McKee M. Soil moisture data assimilation using support vector machines and ensemble Kalman filter. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43:1004-1015.
15. Guo Z.C., Dirmeyer P.A., Koster R.D., et al. GLACE: the global land-atmosphere coupling experiment. Part II: Analysis. J. Hydrometeorol. 2006, 7:611-625.
16. Han X., Franssen H.-J.H., Montzka C., et al. Soil moisture and soil properties estimation in the community land model with synthetic brightness temperature observations. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50:6081-6105.
17. Kaheil Y.H., Gill M.K., McKee M., et al. Downscaling and assimilation of surface soil moisture using ground truth measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46:1375-1384.
18. Kerr Y.H., Waldteufel P., Wigneron J.-P., et al. The SMOS mission: new tool for monitoring key elements of the global water cycle. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98:666-687.
19. Kornelsen K.C., Coulibaly P. Root-zone soil moisture estimation using data-driven methods. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50:2946-2962.
20. Koster R.D., Guo Z.C., Dirmeyer P.A., et al. GLACE: the global land-atmosphere coupling experiment. Part I: Overview. J. Hydrometeorol. 2006, 7:590-610.
21. Koster R.D., Guo Z.C., Dirmeyer P.A., et al. Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science 2004, 305:1138-1140.
22. Kumar S.V., Riechle R.H., Peters-Lidard C.D., et al. A land surface data assimilation framework using the land information system: description and applications. Adv. Water Resour. 2008, 31:1419-1432.
23. Leisenring M., Moradkhani H. Analyzing the uncertainty of suspended sediment load prediction using sequential data assimilation. J. Hydrol. 2012, 468-469:268-282.
24. Li B., Toll D., Zhan X., et al. Improving estimated soil moisture fields through assimilation of AMSR-E soil moisture retrievals with an ensemble Kalman filter and a mass conservation constraint. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:105-119.
25. Liu D., Wang G.L., Mei R., et al. Impact of initial soil moisture anomalies on climate mean and extremes over Asia. J. Geophys. Res. 2014, 119:1-14.
26. Liu D., Wang G.L., Mei R., et al. Diagnosing the strength of land-atmosphere coupling at sub-seasonal to seasonal time scales in Asia. J. Hydrometeorol. 2014, 15:320-339.
27. Liu D., Yu Z., Lv H.S. Data assimilation using support vector machines and ensemble Kalman filter for multi-layer soil moisture prediction. Water Sci. Eng. 2010, 3:361-377.
28. Lu H., Li X., Yu Z., et al. Using a H1 filter assimilation procedure to estimate root zone soil water content. Hydrol. Process. 2010, 24:3648-3660.
29. Mahfouf J.F. Analysis of soil moisture from near-surface parameters: a feasibility study. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1991, 30:1534-1547.
30. Milly P.C.D., Betancourt J., Falkenmark M., et al. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?. Science 2008, 319:573-574.
31. Mishra A.K., Ines A.V.M., Das N.N., et al. Anatomy of a local-scale drought: application of assimilated remote sensing products, crop model, and statistical methods to an agricultural drought study. J. Hydrol. 2015, 526:15-29.
32. Montzka C., Moradkhani H., Weihermüller L., et al. Hydraulic parameter estimation by remotely-sensed top soil moisture observations with the particle filter. J. Hydrol. 2011, 399:410-421.
33. Moradkhani H. Hydrologic remote sensing and land surface data assimilation. Sensors 2008, 8:2986-3004.
34. Ni-Meister W. Recent advances on soil moisture data assimilation. Phys. Geogr. 2008, 29:19-37.
35. Njoku E.G., Jackson T.J., Lakshmi V., et al. Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41:215-229.
36. Reichle R.H., Mclaughlin D.B., Entekhabi D. Hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Weather Rev. 2002, 130:103-114.
37. Ridler M.-E., Madsen H., Stisen S., et al. Assimilation of SMOS-derived soil moisture in a fully integrated hydrological and soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer model in Western Denmark. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50:8962-8981.
38. Samuel J., Coulibaly P., Dumedah G., et al. Assessing model state and forecasts variation in hydrologic data assimilation. J. Hydrol. 2014, 513:127-141.
39. Shibata A., Imaoka K., Koike T. AMSR/AMSR-E level 2 and 3 algorithm developments and data validation plans of NASDA. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41:195-203.
40. Ssegane H., Tollner E.W., Mohamoud Y.M., et al. Advances in variable selection methods I: causal selection methods versus stepwise regression and principal component analysis on data of known and unknown functional relationships. J. Hydrol. 2012, 438-439:16-25.
41. Sun J., Salvucci G., Entekhabi D., et al. Parameter estimation of coupled water and energy balance models based on stationary constraints of surface states. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47.
42. Tran A.P., Vanclooster M., Lambot S. Improving soil moisture profile prediction from ground-penetrating radar data: a maximum likelihood ensemble filter approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17:2543-2556.
43. Vapnik V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995, Springer, New York.
44. Vereecken H., Huisman J.A., Bogena H., et al. On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: a review. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W00D06.
45. Walker J.P., Willgoose G.R., Kalma J.D. One-dimensional soil moisture profile retrieval by assimilation of near-surface measurements: a simplified soil moisture model and field application. J. Hydrometeorol. 2001, 2:356-373.
46. Wei J.F., Dirmeyer P.A., Guo Z.C. Sensitivities of soil wetness simulation to uncertainties in precipitation and radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008, 35.
47. Westra S., Brown C., Lall U., et al. Modeling multivariable hydrological series: principal component analysis or independent component analysis?. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W06429.
48. Yin J., Zhan X., Zheng Y., et al. Optimal ensemble size of ensemble Kalman filter in sequential soil moisture data assimilation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42.
49. Yin J., Zhan X., Zheng Y., et al. Impact of quality control of satellite soil moisture data on their assimilation into land surface model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41:7159-7166.
50. Yu Z., Liu D., Lü H., et al. A multi-layer soil moisture data assimilation using support vector machines and ensemble particle filter. J. Hydrol. 2012, 475:53-64.