Seamless internet 3G and opportunistic WLAN vehicular connectivity

Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Volumn 2011, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Gramaglia, Marco ^a   Bernardos, Carlos J ^a   Calderon, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

3G offloading; address auto configuration; flow mobility; IEEE 802.21; Internet connectivity; routing; Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs)

Indexed keywords

AD HOC NETWORKS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; INTERNET; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; VEHICLES; WIRELESS AD HOC NETWORKS; WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKS (WLAN); WIRELESS NETWORKS;

3G OFFLOADING; AUTO-CONFIGURATION; IEEE802.21; INTERNET CONNECTIVITY; ROUTING; VEHICULAR ADHOC NETWORKS (VANETS);

VEHICULAR AD HOC NETWORKS;

EID: 84964292260     PISSN: 16871472     EISSN: 16871499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2011-183     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ETSI, Intelligent transport systems (ITS): Vehicular communications--Part 6: internet integration, Sub-part 1: Transmission of IPv6 packets over geonetworking protocols (ETSI TS 102 636-6-1 V1.1.1, 2011).
2. ETSI, Intelligent transport systems (ITS): Vehicular communications--GeoNetworking, Part 3: Network architecture (ETSI TS 102 636-3 V1.1.1, March 2010).
3. Wortham J: Customers angered as iPhones overload AT & T.[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/technology/companies/03att.html]
4. Kellogg D: Average U.S. Smartphone data usage up 89% as cost per MB goes down 46%.[http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/average-u-s-smartphone-dat%a-usage-up-89-as-cost-per-mb-goes-down-46/]
5. Zang Y, Sories S, Gehlen G, Walke B: Towards a European solution for networked cars--Integration of car-to-car technology into cellular systems for vehicular communication in Europe.Speech, ITU, Geneva, Switzerland; 2009, 14. [http://www.comnets.rwthaachen.de]
6. Lequerica I, Ruiz PM, Cabrera V: Improvement of vehicular communications by using 3G capabilities to disseminate control information. IEEE Netw 2010, 24: 32-38.
7. Telekom D: Deutsche telekom and iPass are partnering to launch a global WiFi solution meeting the needs of Smartphone users from carriers worldwide.[http://www.telekom.com/dtag/cms/content/dt/en/1025630]
8. Enkelmann W: FleetNet--applications for inter-vehicle communication. Proceedings of IEEE the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2003, 162-167.
9. Maen WJ, Artimy M, Robertson W: Vehicular ad hoc networks: an emerging technology toward safe and efficient transportation. In Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless and Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Volume Chap. 14. Edited by: Boukerche A. Wiley, New York; 2008.
10. Marquez-Barja J, Calafate C, Cano JC, Manzoni P: Multi-layer performance evaluation of a content delivery framewirk for urban vehicular networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC 2010). IEEE; 2010.
11. Gramaglia M, Soto I, Bernardos C, Calderon M: Overhearing assisted optimization of address auto-configuration in position aware VANETs. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2011, 60(7):3332-3349.
12. Reis AB, Sargento S, Tonguz OK: On the performance of sparse vehicular networks with road side units. IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) 2011.
13. Viriyasitavat W, Tonguz O, Bai F: Dynamics of network connectivity in urban vehicular networks. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun Veh Commun Netw 2010, 29(3):515-533.
14. Gramaglia M, Calderon M, Bernardos CJ: TREBOL: Tree-based routing and address autoconfiguration for vehicle-to-internet communications. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) 2011.
15. Devarapalli V, Wakikawa R, Petrescu A, Thubert P: Network mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol. RFC 3963. 2005.
16. Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J: Mobility support in IPv6. RFC 3775. 2004.
17. Wakikawa R, Devarapalli V, Tsirtsis G, Ernst T, Ami KN: Multiple care-of addresses registration. RFC 5648 (Proposed Standard). Internet Engineering Task Force; 2009.
18. Tsirtsis G, Giarreta G, Soliman H, Montavont N: Traffic selectors for flow bindings. RFC 6088 (Proposed Standard). Internet Engineering Task Force; 2011.
19. Tsirtsis G, Soliman H, Montavont N, Giaretta G, Kuladinithi K: Flow bindings in mobile IPv6 and network mobility (NEMO) basic support. RFC 6089 (Proposed Standard). Internet Engineering Task Force; 2011.
20. Thomson S, Narten T, Jinmei T: IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration. RFC 4862 (Draft Standard).Internet Engineering Task Force; 2007. [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4862.txt]
21. De La Oliva A, Banchs A, Soto I, Melia T, Vidal A: An overview of IEEE 802.21: media-independent handover services. IEEE Wirel Commun 2008, 15(4):96-103.
22. Taniuchi K, Ohba Y, Fajardo V, Das S, Tauil M, Cheng Y, Dutta A, Baker D, Yajnik M, Famolari D: IEEE 802.21: media independent handover: features, applicability, and realization. IEEE Commun Mag 2009, 47(1):112-120.
23. Meireles R, Boban M, Steenkiste P, Tonguz O, Barros J: Experimental study on the impact of vehicular obstructions in VANETs. In 2nd IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC 2010). IEEE, Jersey City, NJ; 2010:338-345.
24. Joshi AU, Kulkarni P: Vehicular WiFi access and rate adaptation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference on SIGCOMM, ser. SIG-COMM '10 ACM, New York, NY; 2010, 423-424. [http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1851182.1851243]
25. Hull B, Bychkovsky V, Zhang Y, Chen K, Goraczko M, Miu AK, Shih E, Balakrishnan H, Madden S: CarTel: A distributed mobile sensor computing system. In 4th ACM SenSys. Boulder, CO; 2006.
26. Eriksson J, Balakrishnan H, Madden S: Cabernet: vehicular content delivery using WiFi. In 14th ACM MOBICOM. San Francisco, CA; 2008.
27. Balasubramanian A, Mahajan R, Venkataramani A, Levine BN, Zahorjan J: Interactive WiFi connectivity for moving vehicles. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2008.
28. Mahajan R, Zahorjan J, Zill B: Understanding WiFi-based connectivity from moving vehicles. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement (IMC '07) 2007.
29. Lutterotti P, Pau G, Jiang D, Gerla M, Delgrossi L: C-VeT, the UCLA vehicular testbed: an open platform for vehicular networking and urban sensing. International Conference on Wireless Access for Vehicular Environments (WAVE) 2008.
30. Boban M, Vinhoza TTV, Barros J, Ferreira M, Tonguz OK: Impact of vehicles as obstacles in vehicular ad hoc networks. J Selected Areas Commun 2011, 29(1):15-28.
31. Giannoulis A, Fiore M, Knightly EW: Supporting vehicular mobility in urban multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '08). ACM, New York, NY; 2008:54-66.
32. Annese S, Casetti C, Chiasserini C-F, Maio ND, Ghittino A, Reineri M: Seamless connectivity and routing in vehicular networks with infrastructure. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun 2011, 29(3):501-514.
33. Neumann A, Aichele C, Lindner M, Wunderlich S: Better approach to mobile ad-hoc networking (B.A.T.M.A.N.).Internet Engineering Task Force; 2008. [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openmesh-b-a-t-m-a-n-00]
34. Deshpande P, Kashyap A, Sung C, Das SR: Predictive methods for improved vehicular WiFi access. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '09). ACM, New York, NY; 2009:263-276.
35. Deshpande P, Hou X, Das SR: Performance comparison of 3G and metroscale WiFi for vehicular network access. In Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Internet measurement (IMC '10). ACM, New York, NY; 2010:301-307.
36. Balasubramanian A, Mahajan R, Venkataramani A: Augmenting mobile 3G using WiFi. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, New York, NY; 2010:209-222.
37. Xiao Y, Leung KK, Pan Y, Du X: Architecture, mobility management, and quality of service for integrated 3G and WLAN networks. J Wirel Commun Mobile Comput 2005, 5(7):805-823. 10.1002/wcm.344
38. Zhang Q, Guo C, Guo Z: WZhu, Efficient mobility management for vertical handoff between WWAN and WLAN. Commun Mag 2003, 41(11):102-108. 10.1109/MCOM.2003.1244929
39. Melia T, Bernardos CJ, de la Oliva A, Giust F, Calderon M: IP flow mobility in PMIPv6 based networks: solution design and experimental evaluation. Wirel Personal Commun 2011, 61(4):603-627. 10.1007/s11277-011-0423-3
40. de la Oliva A, Bernardos CJ, Calderon M, Melia T, Zuniga JC: IP flow mobility: smart traffic offload for future wireless networks. Commun Mag 2011, 49(10):124-132.
41. Cespedes S, Shen X, Lazo C: IP mobility management for vehicular communication networks: challenges and solutions. Commun Mag 2011, 49(5):187-194.