Re: Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Jelle O. Barentsz, Peter L. Choyke, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 2016;69:16–40: Is Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Really Necessary When Searching for Prostate Cancer?

European Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2016, Pages e136-

  Rud, Erik ^a   Baco, Eduard ^a  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HUMAN; LETTER; MALE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE TUMOR;

HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84964284143     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.017     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. [1] Weinreb, J.C., Barentsz, J.O., Choyke, P.L., et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 69 (2016), 16–40.
2. [2] Haghighi, M., Shah, S., Taneja, S.S., Rosenkrantz, A.B., Prostate cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic-contrast enhanced imaging for tumor localization-a meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37 (2013), 980–988.
3. [3] Tan, C.H., Paul Hobbs, B., Wei, W., Kundra, V., Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the detection of prostate cancer: meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 204 (2015), W439–W448.
4. [4] Bratan, F., Melodelima, C., Souchon, R., et al. How accurate is multiparametric MR imaging in evaluation of prostate cancer volume?. Radiology 275 (2014), 144–154.
5. [5] de Rooij, M., Hamoen, E.H.J., Witjes, J.A., Barentsz, J.O., Rovers, M.M., Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70 (2016), 233–245.