New Trends of Emerging Technologies in Digital Pathology

Pathobiology

Volumn 83, Issue 2-3, 2016, Pages 61-69

  Bueno, Gloria ^a   Fernández Carrobles, M Milagro ^a   Deniz, Oscar ^a   García Rojo, Marcial ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL DE JEREZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Digital pathology; Image analysis; Standards; Virtual microscopy; Whole slide imaging

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PATHOLOGIST; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAINING; STANDARD; TREND STUDY; WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING; WORKFLOW; IMAGE PROCESSING; TELEPATHOLOGY; TRENDS;

HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY; TELEPATHOLOGY;

EID: 84964252981     PISSN: 10152008     EISSN: 14230291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000443482     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. García-Rojo M, Blobel B, Laurinavicius A: Perspectives on Digital Pathology. Amsterdam, IOS, 2012.
2. Nakhleh RE: Has diagnostic (analytic) accuracy improved in anatomic pathology? Are we better today than we were 20 years ago? Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139: 716-718.
3. Thrall MJ, Wimmer JL, Schwartz MR: Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139: 656-664.
4. Hewitt SM: Digital pathology-are we there yet? 8th Congress of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Dublin, 2015. http://www.pathsoc.org/files/meetings/Dublin2015Presentations/Digital%20Path%20-%201%20Hewitt.pdf.
5. Ho J, Ahlers SM, Stratman C, et al: Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization. J Pathol Inform 2014: 5:33.
6. Farahani N, Pantanowitz L: Overview of telepathology. Surg Pathol Clin 2015; 8: 223-231.
7. Daniel C, García-Rojo M, Klossa J, Della Mea V, Booker D, Beckwith BA, et al: Standardizing the use of whole slide images in digital pathology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2011; 35: 496-505.
8. AIDPATH: Academia and Industry Collaboration for Digital Pathology. http://aidpath. eu/.
9. Daniel C, Booker D, Beckwith B, Della Mea V, García-Rojo M, Havener L, Kennedy M, Klossa J, Laurinavicius A, et al: Standards and specifications in pathology: image management, report management and terminology. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 179: 105-122.
10. Amin M, Rajiv D: Data representation, coding, and communication standards. Surg Pathol 2015; 8: 109-121.
11. Hernandez JS, Allen TC: Transformation of pathologists responding in a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environment. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137: 603-605.
12. Singh R, Chubb L, Pantanowitz L, et al: Standardization in digital pathology: supplement 145 of the DICOM standards. J Pathol Inform 2011; 2: 23.
13. Campbell WS, Campbell JR, West WW, et al: Semantic analysis of SNOMED CT for a postcoordinated database of histopathology findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21: 885-892.
14. García-Rojo M, Morillo-Castro A, Gonçalves L: COST Action 'EuroTelepath': digital pathology integration in electronic health record, including primary care centres. Diagn Pathol 2011; 6(suppl 1):S6.
15. IHE Profiles. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php? title=Profiles#IHE-Anatomic-Pathology-Profiles.
16. Goldsmith JD, Siegal GP, Suster S, et al: Reporting guidelines for clinical pathology reports in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132: 1608-1616.
17. Farahani N, Parwani AW, Pantanowitz L: Whole slide imaging in pathology: advantages, limitations, and emerging perspectives. Pathol Lab Med Int 2015; 7: 23-33.
18. Bauer T, Slaw RJ: Validating whole-slide imaging for consultation diagnoses in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138: 1459-1465.
19. Pantanowitz L, Sinard J, Henricks WH, Fatheree LA, Carter AB, Contis L, Beckwith BA, Evans AJ, Otis CN, Lal A, Parwani AV: Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137: 1710-1722.
20. Redondo R, Bueno G, Cristóbal G, Vidal J, Déniz O, García-Rojo M: Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes. Micron 2012; 43: 334-343.
21. Yagi Y, Pantanowitz L: Comment on 'Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes': are scanners better than microscopes? J Pathol Inform 2012; 3: 14.
22. Yagi Y, Gilbertson J: A relationship between slide quality and image quality in whole slide imaging. Diagn Pathol 2008; 3:S12.
23. Bautista PA, Hashimoto N, Yagi Y: Color standardization in whole slide imaging using a color calibration slide. J Pathol Inform 2014; 5: 4.
24. Bautista PA, Yagi Y: Improving the visualization and detection of tissue folds in whole slide images through color enhancement. J Pathol Inform 2010; 1: 25.
25. Avanakia A, Espiga K, Kimpe T, Xthonaa A, Marchessoux C, Rostang J, Piepers B: Perceptual uniformity of commonly used color spaces. Medical Imaging 2014: Digital Pathology. Proc SPIE 2014; 9041: 90410V.
26. Kimpe T, Rostang J, Avanaki A, et al: Does the choice of display system influence perception and visibility of clinically relevant features in digital pathology images? Medical Imaging 2014: Digital Pathology. Proc SPIE 2014; 9041: 904109.
27. Randell R, Ambepitiya T, Mello-Thoms C, Ruddle RA, Brettle D, Thomas RG, Treanor D: Effect of display resolution on time to diagnosis with virtual pathology slides in a systematic search task. J Digit Imaging 2015; 28: 68-76.
28. García-Rojo M, Bueno G: Analysis of the impact of high-resolution monitors in digital pathology. J Pathol Inform 2015; 6: 57.
29. Gurcan MN, Can A, Boucheron L, Madabhushi A, Rajpoot N, Yener B: Histopathological image analysis: A review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2009; 2: 147-171.
30. Bhattacharjee S, Mukherjee J, Nag S, Maitra IK, Bandyopadhyay SK: Review on histopathological slide analysis using digital microscopy. Int J Adv Sci Technol 2014; 62: 65-96.
31. Kong J, Cooper LA, Wang F, Gao J, et al: Machine-based morphologic analysis of glioblastoma using whole-slide pathology images uncovers clinically relevant molecular correlates. PLoS One 2013; 8:e81049.
32. Yeh FC, Parwani AV, Pantanowitz L, Ho C: Automated grading of renal cell carcinoma using whole slide imaging. J Pathol Inform 2014; 5: 23.
33. Lu H, Papathomas TG, Zessen D, et al: Automated selection of hotspots (ASH): enhanced automated segmentation and adaptive step finding for Ki67 hotspot detection in adrenal cortical cancer. Diagn Pathol 2014; 9: 216.
34. Fernández-Carrobles MM, Tadeo I, Bueno G, Noguera R, Déniz O, Salido J, García-Rojo M: TMA vessel segmentation based on color and morphological features: application to angiogenesis research. ScientificWorldJournal 2013; 2013:263190.
35. Deniz O, Toomey D, Conway C, Bueno G: Multi-stained whole slide image alignment in digital pathology. Medical Imaging 2015: Digital Pathology. Proc SPIE 2015; 9420: 94200Z.
36. Fernández-Carrobles MM, Bueno G, Déniz O, Salido J, García-Rojo M, González-López L: Influence of texture and colour in breast TMA classification. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0141556.
37. Bigley A: Application of pattern recognition software on preclinical and safety studies. 8th Congress of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Dublin, 2015, AIDPATH Workhop.
38. Evans RG, Naidu B, Rajpoot MM, Epstein D, Khan M: Toponome imaging system: multiplex biomarkers in oncology. Trends Mol Med 2012; 18: 723-731.
39. Stack EC, Wang C, Roman KA, Hoyt CC: Multiplexed immunohistochemistry, imaging, and quantitation: A review, with an assessment of Tyramide signal amplification, multispectral imaging and multiplex analysis. Methods 2014; 70: 46-58.
40. Slater C: Multispectral imaging and image analysis software can accurately quantify immunophenotypically distinct tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) using chromogenic multiplexed immunohistochemistry (IHC) in lymphoid tissue microarrays (TMAs). 26th European Congress of Pathology, London, August 30 to September 3, 2014.
41. Byers R, Hornick JL, Tholouli E, Kutok J, Rodig JS: Detection of IDH1 R132H mutation in acute myeloid leukemia by mutation-specific immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2012; 20: 37-40.
42. Byers RJ, Hitchman ER: Quantum dots brighten biological imaging. Prog Histochem Cytochem 2011; 45: 201-237.
43. Slater C: Investigating the prognostic significance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD): A novel approach. 26th European Congress of Pathology, London, August 30 to September 3, 2014.