Analyzing repeated measurements using mixed models

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 315, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 407-408

  Detry, Michelle A ^a   Ma, Yan ^b  

^a BERRY CONSULTANTS   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MIXED MODEL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPEATED MEASUREMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA ACCURACY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MODELS, STATISTICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84964220738     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.19394     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. Moseley AM, Beckenkamp PR, Haas M, Herbert RD, Lin CW; EXACT Team. Rehabilitation after immobilization for ankle fracture: the EXACT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1376-1385.
2. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley; 2011.
3. Newgard CD, Lewis RJ. Missing data: how to best account for what is not known. JAMA. 2015;314(9): 940-941. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10516.
4. Ma Y, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG. Beyond repeated-measures analysis of variance: advanced statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in anesthesia research. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(1):99-105.
5. Li P, Stuart EA, Allison DB. Multiple imputation: a flexible tool for handlingmissing data. JAMA. 2015;314(18):1966-1967. doi:10.1001/jama.2015 .15281.