Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: Preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques

Injury

Volumn 45, Issue S5, 2014, Pages S26-S31

  Guerra, Marcelo T E ^a,b,d   Pasqualin, Sandro ^a   Souza, Marcos Paulo ^c   Lenz, Renata ^a  

^a Hospital Universitário de Canoas   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL   (Brazil)

^c HOSPITAL MÃE DE DEUS   (Brazil)

^d NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Functional outcome; Intertrochanteric fractures; Intramedullary nail; Sliding compression hip screw

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS SCORE; ARTICLE; BONE NAIL; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; FEMALE; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY SCORE; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HIP FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURES; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL FIXATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE NAILS; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY; FRACTURE HEALING; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; METHODS; PHYSIOPATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84964199943     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: 18790267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(14)70017-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. G Holt, R Smith, K Duncan, JD Hutchison, A Gregori Outcome after surgery for the treatment of hip fracture in the extremely elderly J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 2008 1899 1905
2. K Matre, LI Havelin, JE Gjertsen, T Vinje, B Espehaug, JM Fevang Sliding hip screw versus IM nail in reverse oblique trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A study of 2716 patients in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register Injury 44 6 2013 Jun 735 742
3. W Ekström, AN Al-Ani, M Sääf, T Cederholm, S Ponzer, M Hedström Health related quality of life, reoperation rate and function in patients with diabetes mellitus and hip fracture-a 2 year follow-up study Injury 44 6 2013 Jun 769 775
4. R McCormack, K Panagiotopolous, R Buckley, M Penner, B Perey, G Pate, T Goetz, M Piper A multicentre, prospective, randomised comparison of the sliding hip screw with the Medoff sliding screw and side plate for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures Injury 44 12 2013 Dec 1904 1909
5. JD Chang, JH Yoo, P Reddy, SS Lee, JH Hwang, TY Kim Risk factors for contralateral hip fracture in elderly patients with previous hip fracture Injury 44 12 2013 Dec 1930 1933
6. KJ Koval, GB Aharonoff, AS Rokito, T Lyon, JD Zuckerman Patients with femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures. Are they the same? Clin Orthop Relat Res 330 1996 166 172
7. PR Kuzyk, J Lobo, D Whelan, R Zdero, MD McKee, EH Schemitsch Biomechanical evaluation of extramedullary versus intramedullary fixation for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures J Orthop Trauma 23 2009 31 38
8. CE Uzoigwe, HG Burnand, CL Cheesman, DO Aghedo, M Faizi, RG Middleton Early and ultra-early surgery in hip fracture patients improves survival Injury 44 6 2013 Jun 726 729
9. DR Wordsworth, T Halsey, R Griffiths, MJ Parker Clopidogrel has no effect on mortality from hip fracture Injury 44 6 2013 Jun 743 746
10. A Kadar, O Chechik, E Katz, I Blum, G Meghiddo, M Salai, E Steinberg, A Sternheim The effects of 'old' red blood cell transfusion on mortality and morbidity in elderly patients with hip fractures-a retrospective study Injury 44 6 2013 Jun 747 750
11. KJ Koval, JD Heckman Intertrochanteric fractures RW Bucholz JD Heckman Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 1635 1663
12. O Hersche, D Heim, A Bodoky, P Regazzoni [4 fragment fractures of the proximal femur: is the dynamic hip screw a suitable implant?] Helv Chir Acta 56 1989 577 80.6
13. NE Efstathopoulos, VS Nikolaou, JT Lazarettos Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs Int Orthop 31 2007 71 76
14. P Frohlich, T Benko [DHS (Dynamic Hip Screw)-osteosynthesis in the management of femoral fractures in the hip region and the place of this method in the treatment of such injuries] Magy Traumatol Ortop Kezseb Plasztikai Seb 36 1993 59 64
15. C Boldin, FJ Seibert, F Fankhauser, G Peicha, W Grechenig, R Szyszkowitz The proximal femoral nail (PFN)-a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months Acta Orthop Scand 74 2003 53 58
16. F Fogagnolo, M Kfuri Jr., CA Paccola Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124 2004 31 37
17. JD Zuckerman, KJ Koval, GB Aharonoff, ML Skovron A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: II. Validity and reliability J Orthop Trauma 14 2000 26 30
18. S Siegel Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences 1956 McGraw-Hill New York
19. T Pavelka, J Matejka, H Cervenkova [Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail] Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 72 2005 344 354
20. B Giraud, E Dehoux, N Jovenin, K Madi, A Harisboure, G Usandizaga et al. [Pertrochanteric fractures: a randomized prospective study comparing dynamic screw plate and intramedullary fixation] Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91 2005 732 736
21. M Saudan, A Lubbeke, C Sadowski, N Riand, R Stern, P Hoffmeyer Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail J Orthop Trauma 16 2002 386 393
22. FH Dujardin, C Benez, G Polle, J Alain, N Biga, JM Thomine Prospective randomized comparison between a dynamic hip screw and a mini-invasive static nail in fractures of the trochanteric area: preliminary results J Orthop Trauma 15 2001 401 406
23. I Saarenpaa, T Heikkinen, J Ristiniemi, P Hyvonen, J Leppilahti, P Jalovaara Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients Int Orthop 33 2009 255 260
24. P Benum, T Grontvedt, M Braten, A Walloe, A Ekeland, S Raugstad et al. Gamma nail versus CHS in intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures- a preliminary report of a prospective randomized study Acta Orthop Scand 63 1992 7 8
25. RJ Bess, SA Jolly Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures J South Orthop Assoc 6 1997 173 179
26. SH Bridle, AD Patel, M Bircher, PT Calvert Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw J Bone Joint Surg Br 73 1991 330 334
27. MS Butt, SJ Krikler, S Nafie, MS Ali Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial Injury 26 1995 615 618
28. CH Crawford, AL Malkani, S Cordray, CS Roberts, W Sligar The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a review of 93 cases J Trauma 60 2006 325 328 discussion 328-9.
29. MR Baumgaertner, SL Curtin, DM Lindskog Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures Clin Orthop Relat Res 348 1998 87 94
30. O Kwasny, M Fuchs [The dynamic hip screw for the management of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures] Unfallchirurg 94 1991 430 435
31. KD Schmidt [Differential choice of the procedure in the surgical treatment of fractures in the trochanteric area] Zentralbl Chir 109 1984 910 918
32. GA Macheras, SD Koutsostathis, S Galanakos, K Kateros, SA Papadakis Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 2012 3067 3076
33. F O'Neill, F Condon, T McGloughlin, B Lenehan, JC Coffey, M Walsh Dynamic hip screw versus DHS blade: a biomechanical comparison of the fixation achieved by each implant in bone J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 2011 616 621
34. ML Forte, BA Virnig, RL Kane, S Durham, M Bhandari, R Feldman et al. Geographic variation in device use for intertrochanteric hip fractures J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 2008 691 699
35. TA Radcliff, E Regan, DC Cowper Ripley, E Hutt Increased use of intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures in veterans affairs hospitals: a comparative effectiveness study J Bone Joint Surg Am 94 2012 833 840
36. M Butler, ML Forte, SB Joglekar, MF Swiontkowski, RL Kane Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures J Bone Joint Surg Am 93 2011 1104 1115
37. JY Hong, SW Suh, JH Park, YS Shin, JR Yoon, JH Yang Comparison of soft-tissue serum markers in stable intertrochanteric fracture: dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail - A preliminary study Injury 42 2011 204 208
38. NJ Little, V Verma, C Fernando, DS Elliott, A Khaleel A prospective trial comparing the Holland nail with the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 2008 1073 1078
39. V Goulidakis, S Theocharakis, A Diakatos, D Gourovanidis, E Drakoulakis, A Pastroudis A35 Comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail-G3 and Dynamic Hip Screw. Results and clinical outcome Injury 42 2011 S9
40. A Calderon, T Ramos, F Vilchez, O Mendoza-Lemus, V Pena, E Cardenas-Estrada et al. [Proximal femoral intramedullary nail versus DHS plate for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective analysis] Acta Ortop Mex 27 2013 236 239
41. A Eschler, S Brandt, P Gierer, T Mittlmeier, G Gradl Angular stable multiple screw fixation (Targon FN) versus standard SHS for the fixation of femoral neck fractures Injury 45 2014 S76 S80