Managing the review process in accounting research: Advice from authors and editors

Issues in Accounting Education

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 235-252

  Dalton, Derek W ^a   Harp, Nancy L ^a   Oler, Derek K ^b   Widener, Sally K ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Doctoral students; Publishing; Research; Review process

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964054323     PISSN: 07393172     EISSN: 15587983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/iace-50979     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Ashton, R. H. 1998. Writing accounting research for publication and impact. Journal of Accounting Education 16: 247-260.
2. Bailey, C. D., D. R. Hermanson, and T. J. Louwers. 2008. An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals. Journal of Accounting Education 26: 55-72.
3. Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (2): 159-178.
4. Ball, R., and P. Brown. 2014. Ball and Brown (1968): A retrospective. The Accounting Review 89 (1): 26.
5. Beyer, B., D. Herrmann, G. K. Meek, and E. T. Rapley. 2010. What it means to be an accounting professor: A concise career guide for doctoral students in accounting. Issues in Accounting Education 25 (2): 227-244.
6. Bonner, S. E., J. W. Hesford, W. A. Van der Stede, and S. M. Young. 2006. The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (7): 663-685.
7. Chow, C. W., and P. Harrison. 1998. Factors contributing to success in research and publications: Insights of ‘‘influential’’ accounting authors. Journal of Accounting Education 16: 463-472.
8. De Lange, P. A. 2005. The long road to publishing: A user-friendly expose. Accounting Education: An International Journal 14: 133-168.
9. Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
10. Gans, J. S., and G. B. Shepherd. 1994. How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6: 165-179.
11. Glover, S. M., D. F. Prawitt, and D. A. Wood. 2006. Publication records of faculty promoted at the top 75 accounting research programs. Issues in Accounting Education 21: 195-218.
12. Glover, S. M., D. F. Prawitt, S. L. Summers, and D. A. Wood. 2012. Publication benchmarking data based on faculty promoted at the top 75 U.S. accounting research institutions. Issues in Accounting Education 27: 647-670.
13. Hermanson, D. R. 2008. What I have learned so far: Observations on managing an academic accounting career. Issues in Accounting Education 23: 53-66.
14. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2004. Reviewing the review process. Journal of the American Taxation Association 26: 143-154.
15. Moizer, P. 2009. Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: 285-304.
16. Nathan, S., D. R. Hermanson, and R. H. Hermanson. 1998. Co-authoring in refereed journals: Views of accounting faculty and department chairs. Issues in Accounting Education 13 (1): 79-92.
17. Oler, D. K., and W. R. Pasewark. 2016. How to review a paper. Issues in Accounting Education 31 (2).
18. Omer, T. C., S. L. Porter, R. J. Yetman, and A. M. Magro. 2004. A discussion with reviewers: Insights from the midyear ATA meetings. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 26: 135-141.
19. Spiegel, M. 2012. Reviewing less-progressing more. Review of Financial Studies 25 (5): 1331-1338.
20. Stone, D. N. 1996. Getting tenure in accounting: A personal account of learning to dance with the mountain. Issues in Accounting Education 11: 187-201.
21. Zimmerman, J. L. 1989. Improving a manuscript’s readability and likelihood of publication. Issues in Accounting Education 4: 458-466.