Comparison of newton’s integral in the space and frequency domains

International Association of Geodesy Symposia

Volumn 128, Issue , 2005, Pages 386-391

  Kuhn, M ^a   Seitz, K ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Newton s integral; Numerical integration; Spherical harmonics; Tesseroid; Topography

Indexed keywords

FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; GEODESY; GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS; INTEGRATION; SPHERES; TOPOGRAPHY;

DIRECT INTEGRATION; GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL; NUMERICAL INTEGRATIONS; S INTEGRALS; SPACE AND FREQUENCY DOMAINS; SPHERICAL HARMONIC EXPANSIONS; SPHERICAL HARMONICS; TESSEROID;

HARMONIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 84964049187     PISSN: 09399585     EISSN: 21979359     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27432-4_66     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Anderson EG (1976): The effect of topography on solutions of Stokes’s problem. UNISURV Report S14, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia, pp. 252.
2. Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical Geodesy, Freeman, San Francisco, 364 pp.
3. Hildebrand FB (1974) Introduction to numerical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (reprinted 1987 by Dover Publications, New York, 669 pp).
4. Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2002) A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions, J Geod 76: 279-299.
5. Kuhn M (2002) On the indirect effect of Helmert’s condensation methods. International Geoid Service Bulletin 13: 50-61.
6. Kuhn M, Featherstone WE (2003a) On the optimal spatial resolution of crustal mass distributions for forward gravity field modelling. In Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002, Proceedings of the 3rd meeting of the International Gravity and Geoid Commission, Thessaloniki, Greece, 195-200.
7. Kuhn M, Featherstone WE (2003b, this issue) Construction of a synthetic Earth gravity model by forward gravity modelling. Paper presented at the General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, June-July, 2003, Sapporo, Japan.
8. Lambeck K (1988) Geophysical Geodesy — The slow deformation of the Earth. Univ. Press, Oxford, 718 pp.
9. Lemoine FG and 14 other authors (1998) The development of the NASA GSFC and National Imaginary and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. Rep. NASA/TP-1998-206861, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Maryland, 575 pp.
10. Mader K (1951) Das Newtonsche Raumpotential prismatischer Körper und seine Ableitung bis zur dritten Ordnung. Österreichische Zeitschrift fur Vermessungswesen, Sonderheft 11. Nagy D (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics 31: 362-371.
11. Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism, J Geod 74: 552-560.
12. Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2002) Corrections to “The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism”, J Geod 76: 475.
13. Ramillen G (2002) Gravity/magnetic potential of uneven shell topography, J Geod 76: 139-149.
14. Seitz K, Heck B (2003) Efficient calculation of topographic reductions by the use of tesseroids. Presentation at the joint assembly of the EGS, AGU and EUG, Nice, France, 6-11 April 2003.