How to discuss a paper: Developing and showcasing your scholarly skills

Issues in Accounting Education

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 211-218

  Cook, Kirsten A ^a   Hart, Matthew ^a   Kinney, Michael R ^b   Oler, Derek K ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting research; Discussing; Doctoral education; Reviewing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964039836     PISSN: 07393172     EISSN: 15587983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/iace-50920     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bailey, C. D., D. R. Hermanson, and T. J. Louwers. 2008. An examination of the peer-review process in accounting journals. Journal of Accounting Education 26 (2): 55-72.
2. Demski, J. S., and J. L. Zimmerman. 2000. On ‘‘research vs. teaching:’’ A long-term perspective. Accounting Horizons 14 (3): 343-352.
3. Kachelmeier, S. J. 2004. Reviewing the review process. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 26 (Supplement): 143-154.
4. Moizer, P. 2009. Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (2): 285-304.
5. Oler, D. K., and W. R. Pasewark. 2015. How to review a paper. Issues in Accounting Education (forthcoming).
6. Omer, T. C., S. L. Porter, R. J. Yetman, A. M. Magro, L. F. Mills, R. C. Sansing, and B. C. Ayers. 2004. A discussion with reviewers: Insights from the midyear ATA meetings. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 26 (Supplement): 135-141.