Municipal water schemes in a mumbai squatter settlement: Assembling space and society

International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 77-92

  Cooper, Reid W F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assemblage; Emergence; Hybrid; Mumbai; Network; Political; Space; Squatter settlement; Urban; Water

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964031715     PISSN: 19463138     EISSN: 19463146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2011.557894     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abrams, C., 1964. Man's struggle for shelter in an urbanising world, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
2. Amin, A., 2007. Re-thinking the urban social. City., 11 (1):100–114.
3. Appadurai, A., 2001. Deep democracy:urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environ Urban., 13 (2):23–43.
4. Benjamin, S., 2004. Urban land transformation for pro-poor economies. Geoforum., 35 (2):177–187.
5. Bhide, A., 2009. Shifting terrains of communities and community organization:reflections on organizing for housing rights in Mumbai. Community Dev J., 44 (3):367–381.
6. Bonata, M, and Protevi, J., 2004. Deleuze and geophilosophy, Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
7. Chinai, R., 2002. Mumbai slum dwellers' sewage project goes nationwide. Bull World Health Org., 80 (8):684–685.
8. Colaba Water Department. 2007. Archives, Mumbai, India:Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai.
9. DeFilippis, J., 2004. Unmaking Goliath:community control in the face of global capital, New York:Routledge.
10. de Landa, M., 1997. A thousand years of nonlinear history, New York:Zone Books.
11. de Landa, M., [2006] 2009. A new philosophy of society, London:Continuum.
12. Deshpande, S. Jan 9 2008. “ 400 Huts razed at Cuffe Parade ”. In Times of India, Jan 9, Mumbai:Times of India Group.
13. Gandy, M., 2008. Landscapes of disaster:water, modernity, and urban fragmentation in Mumbai. Environ Plan A., 40 (1):108–130.
14. Graham, S, and Marvin, S., 2001. Splintering urbanism:networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition, London:Routledge.
15. Kaika, M., 2004. City of flows:modernity, nature, and the city, New York:Routledge.
16. Register General & Census Commissioner. 2001. Census of India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Delhi:Controller of Publications.
17. Roy, A., 2003. Paradigms of propertied citizenship:transnational techniques of analysis. Urban Aff Rev., 38 (4):463–491.
18. Sanyal, B., 1990. Knowledge transfer from poor to rich cities:a new turn of events. Cities., 7:31–36.
19. Sassen, S., 1991. The global city:New York, London, Tokyo, New York:Princeton University Press.
20. Stokes, C., 1962. A theory of slums. Land Econ., 38:187–197.
21. Swyngedouw, E., 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen:the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Stud., 42 (11):1991–2006.
22. Turner, JFC., 1963. Dwelling resources in South America. Archit Des., 37:360–393.
23. Turner, JFC., 1967. Barriers and channels for housing development in modernising countries. J Am Inst Plann., xxxiii:167–181.
24. Vyas, S., Feb 23 2009. “ BMC admits its officials run slum racket ”. In Times of India, Feb 23, Mumbai:Times of India Group.
25. Whatmore, S., 2002. Hybrid geographies, London:Sage.
26. Wilson, D., 2004. Toward a contingent urban neoliberalism. Urban Geogr., 24 (8):771–783.
27. [YUVA] Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action. 2005. The Mumbai evictions:an analysis of impact in twenty-eight communities, Mumbai:Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action.