Strategic Planning in Population Health and Public Health Practice: A Call to Action for Higher Education

Milbank Quarterly

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 109-125

  Phelps, Charles ^a   Madhavan, Guruprasad ^b   Rappuoli, Rino ^c   Levin, Scott ^d   Shortliffe, Edward ^e   Colwell, Rita ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^c GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

cost effectiveness; population health; public health practice; systems analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDUCATION; HEALTH; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY; MULTICRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; POPULATION HEALTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STRATEGIC MULTI ATTRIBUTE RANKING TOOL FOR VACCINES; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THEORY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SCHOOL; STANDARDS; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION; TRENDS;

VACCINE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ACCURACY; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EDUCATION, PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONAL; HEALTH PLANNING; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SCHOOLS, PUBLIC HEALTH; VACCINES;

EID: 84963959685     PISSN: 0887378X     EISSN: 14680009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12182     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gauvreau C, Ungar W, Kohler J, Zlotkin S,. The use of cost-effectiveness analysis for pediatric immunization in developing countries. Milbank Q. 2012; 90 (4): 762-790.
2. U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The Agency, its Mission and Statutory Authority. www.irs.gov/uac/The-Agency,-its-Mission-and-Statutory-Authority. Accessed December 8, 2015.
3. U.S. Strategic Command. Mission. www.stratcom.mil/mission. Accessed January 29, 2016.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. About EPA. www.epa.gov/aboutepa. Accessed January 29, 2016.
5. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Diseases of Importance in the United States. Vol. 1 of New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985.
6. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries. Vol. 2 of New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1986.
7. IOM (Institute of Medicine), Stratton K, et al., eds. Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decision Making. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
8. Edejer TT-T, Baltussen R, Adam T, et al., Making Choices in Health: WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
9. Centers for Disease Control, and, Prevention Division for Heart Disease, and, Stroke Prevention,. http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/programs/spha/economic-evaluation/. Accessed February 10, 2016.
10. Edwards W, Barron FH,. SMARTS and SMARTER-improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 1994; 60 (3): 306-325.
11. IOM (Institute of Medicine), Madhavan G, et al., eds. Ranking Vaccines: A Prioritization Framework. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
12. IOM (Institute of Medicine), Madhavan G, et al., eds. Ranking Vaccines: A Prioritization Software Tool. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.
13. IOM (Institute of Medicine) and NAE (National Academy of Engineering), Madhavan G, et al., eds. Ranking Vaccines: Applications of a Prioritization Software Tool. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.
14. Madhavan G, Phelps C, Sangha K, Levin S, Rappuoli R,. Bridging the gap: need for a data repository to support vaccine prioritization efforts. Vaccine. 2015; 33 (S2): B34-B39.
15. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Who Will Keep the Public Healthy? Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.