Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: A comparison of airborne laser scanning and structure from motion (SfM) point clouds

Forests

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Wallace, Luke ^a,b   Lucieer, Arko ^a   Malenovskỳ, Zbyněk ^a,c   Turner, Darren ^a   Vopěnka, Petr ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

^d CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Canopy cover; Digital terrain model; Forest structure; LIDAR airborne laser scanning; Structure from motion; Tree height; Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Indexed keywords

LANDFORMS; LASER APPLICATIONS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REMOTE SENSING; SCANNING; SURFACE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; CANOPY COVER; DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; FOREST STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION; TREE HEIGHT;

FORESTRY;

AIRBORNE SENSING; DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST COVER; HEIGHT DETERMINATION; LASER METHOD; LIDAR; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; STAND DYNAMICS; UNMANNED VEHICLE; VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84963958145     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19994907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/f7030062     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. McElhinny, C.; Gibbons, P.; Brack, C.; Bauhus, J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: Its definition and measurement. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 218, 1-24.
2. Lindenmayer, D.B.; Margules, C.R.; Botkin, D.B.; Biology, C.; Aug, N. Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 14, 941-950.
3. Keith, H.; Mackey, B.G.; Lindenmayer, D.B. Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11635-11640.
4. Gómez, C.; Wulder, M.A.; Montes, F.; Delgado, J.A. Modeling forest structural parameters in the mediterranean pines of central Spain using QuickBird-2 imagery and classification and regression tree analysis (CART). Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 135-159.
5. Kane, V.R.; North, M.P.; Lutz, J.A.; Churchill, D.J.; Roberts, S.L.; Smith, D.F.; McGaughey, R.J.; Kane, J.T.; Brooks, M.L. Assessing fire effects on forest spatial structure using a fusion of Landsat and airborne LiDAR data in Yosemite National Park. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 151, 89-101.
6. Zellweger, F.; Braunisch, V.; Baltensweiler, A.; Bollmann, K. Remotely sensed forest structural complexity predicts multi species occurrence at the landscape scale. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 307, 303-312.
7. Hill, A.; Breschan, J.; Mandallaz, D. Accuracy Assessment of Timber Volume Maps Using Forest Inventory Data and LiDAR Canopy Height Models. Forests 2014, 5, 2253-2275.
8. St-Onge, B.; Audet, F.-A.; Bégin, J. Characterizing the Height Structure and Composition of a Boreal Forest Using an Individual Tree Crown Approach Applied to Photogrammetric Point Clouds. Forests 2015, 6, 3899-3922.
9. Ota, T.; Ogawa, M.; Shimizu, K.; Kajisa, T.; Mizoue, N.; Yoshida, S.; Takao, G.; Hirata, Y.; Furuya, N.; Sano, T.; et al. Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Structure from Motion Approach with Aerial Photographs in a Seasonal Tropical Forest. Forests 2015, 6, 3882-3898.
10. Matese, A.; Toscano, P.; Di Gennaro, S.F.; Genesio, L.; Vaccari, F.P.; Primicerio, J.; Belli, C.; Zaldei, A.; Bianconi, R.; Gioli, B. Intercomparison of UAV, Aircraft and Satellite Remote Sensing Platforms for Precision Viticulture. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 2971-2990.
11. Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Diaz-Varela, R.; Angileri, V.; Loudjani, P. Tree height quantification using very high resolution imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and automatic 3D photo-reconstruction methods. Eur. J. Agron. 2014, 55, 89-99.
12. Lucieer, A.; Turner, D.; King, D.; Robinson, S. Using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to capture micro-topography of antarctic moss beds. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2014, 27, 53-62.
13. Turner, D.; Lucieer, A.;Wallace, L. Direct georeferencing of ultrahigh-resolution UAV imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 2738-2745.
14. Dandois, J.P.; Ellis, E.C. High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 136, 259-276.
15. Jaakkola, A.; Hyyppä, J.; Kukko, A.; Yu, X.; Kaartinen, H.; Lehtomäki, M.; Lin, Y. A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2010, 65, 514-522.
16. Lisein, J.; Pierrot-Deseilligny, M.; Bonnet, S.; Lejeune, P. A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery. Forests 2013, 4, 922-944.
17. Wallace, L.; Musk, R.; Lucieer, A. An assessment of the repeatability of automatic forest inventory metrics derived from UAV-borne laser scanning data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 7160-7169.
18. Wallace, L.; Lucieer, A.;Watson, C.; Turner, D. Development of a UAV-LiDAR system with application to forest inventory. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1519-1543.
19. Snavely, N.; Seitz, S.M.; Szeliski, R. Modeling the world from Internet photo collections. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008, 80, 189-210.
20. Wallace, L.; Watson, C.; Lucieer, A. Detecting pruning of individual stems using airborne laser scanning data captured from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2014, 30, 76-85.
21. Wallace, L.; Lucieer, A.; Watson, C.S. Evaluating tree detection and segmentation routines on very high resolution UAV LiDAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 7619-7628.
22. White, J.C.; Wulder, M.A.; Vastaranta, M.; Coops, N.C.; Pitt, D.; Woods, M. The utility of image-based point clouds for forest inventory: A comparison with airborne laser scanning. Forests 2013, 4, 518-536.
23. White, J.; Stepper, C.; Tompalski, P.; Coops, N.;Wulder, M. Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment. Forests 2015, 6, 3704-3732.
24. Penner, M.; Woods, M.; Pitt, D.A. Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Image Point Cloud Derived Tree Size Class Distribution Models in Boreal Ontario. Forests 2015, 6, 4034-4054.
25. Verhoeven, G. Taking Computer Vision Aloft-Archeological Three-dimensional Reconstructions from Aerial Photographs with PhotoScan. Archaeol. Prospect. 2011, 18, 67-73.
26. Isenburg, M. Lastools: Converting, Filtering, Viewing, Gridding, and Compressing Lidar Data. Available online: http://www.cs.unc.edu/~isenburg/lastools/(accessed on 4 March 2016).
27. Edelsbrunner, H.; Mücke, E.P. Three-dimensional alpha shape. ACM Trans. Graph. 1994, 13, 43-72.
28. Wallace, L. Assessing the stability of canopy maps produced from UAV-LiDAR data. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Melbourne, Victoria, 21-26 July 2013; pp. 3879-3882.
29. Chasmer, L.; Hopkinson, C.; Treitz, P. Investigating laser pulse penetration through a conifer canopy by integrating airborne and terrestrial lidar. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 32, 116-125.
30. Kaartinen, H.; Hyyppä, J.; Yu, X.; Vastaranta, M.; Hyyppä, H.; Kukko, A.; Holopainen, M.; Heipke, C.; Hirschmugl, M.; Morsdorf, F.; et al. An international comparison of individual tree detection and extraction using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 950-974.
31. McRoberts, R.E.; Næsset, E.; Gobakken, T.; Bollandsås, O.M. Indirect and direct estimation of forest biomass change using forest inventory and airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 164, 36-42.
32. Wallace, L.; Lucieer, A.; Turner, D.; Watson, C. Error assessment and mitigation for hyper-temporal UAV-borne LiDAR surveys of forest inventory. In Proceedings of the SilviLaser, Hobart, Tasmania, 16-19 October 2011.
33. Anderson, K.; Gaston, K.J. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11, 138-146.
34. Disney, M.I.; Kalogirou, V.; Lewis, P.; Prieto-Blanco, A.; Hancock, S.; Pfeifer, M. Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 1546-1560.
35. Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C.; Coggins, S.; Ortlepp, S.M.; Coops, N.C.; Heath, J.; Mora, B. Digital high spatial resolution aerial imagery to support forest health monitoring: The mountain pine beetle context. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2012, 6, 062527.
36. Getzin, S.; Wiegand, K.; Schöning, I. Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high-resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 397-404.
37. Asner, G.P.; Knapp, D.E.; Kennedy-Bowdoin, T.; Jones, M.O.; Martin, R.E.; Boardman, J.; Field, C.B. Carnegie Airborne Observatory: In-flight fusion of hyperspectral imaging and waveform light detection and ranging for three-dimensional studies of ecosystems. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2007, 1, 013536.
38. Lucieer, A.; Malenovsky, Z.; Veness, T.; Wallace, L. HyperUAS-Imaging Spectroscopy from a Multirotor Unmanned Aircraft System. J. F. Robot. 2014, 4, 571-590.