메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 101, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1644-1645

Adjust for Multiple Comparisons? It's Not That Simple

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA ANALYSIS; EFFECT SIZE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIST; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDY DESIGN;

EID: 84963945561     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.024     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (536)

References (4)
  • 1
    • 0025031812 scopus 로고
    • No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons
    • K.J. Rothman No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons Epidemiology 1 1990 43 46
    • (1990) Epidemiology , vol.1 , pp. 43-46
    • Rothman, K.J.1
  • 2
    • 0032542897 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
    • T.V. Perneger What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments BMJ 315 1998 1236 1238
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.315 , pp. 1236-1238
    • Perneger, T.V.1
  • 3
    • 3342943178 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?
    • R.J. Feise Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment? BMC Med Res Methodol 2 2002 8
    • (2002) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.2 , pp. 8
    • Feise, R.J.1
  • 4
    • 0018706170 scopus 로고
    • The evolving case-control study
    • P. Cole The evolving case-control study J Chron Dis 32 1979 15 27
    • (1979) J Chron Dis , vol.32 , pp. 15-27
    • Cole, P.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.