Comparative study of 27-gauge vs 25-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane

Eye (Basingstoke)

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 538-544

  Mitsui, K ^a   Kogo, J ^a   Takeda, H ^a   Shiono, A ^a   Sasaki, H ^a   Munemasa, Y ^a   Kitaoka, Y ^a   Takagi, H ^a  

^a ST MARIANNA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

25 GAUGE MICROINCISION VITRECTOMY; 27 GAUGE MICROINCISION VITRECTOMY; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INNER LIMITING MEMBRANE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA MACULOPATHY; SCLEROTOMY; VITRECTOMY; WOUND CLOSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCLERA; SCLEROSTOMY; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCLERA; SCLEROSTOMY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 84963800246     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.275     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fuji GY, De Juan Jr E, Humayun MS, Pieramici DJ, Chang TS, Awh C et al A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1807-1812.
2. Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Retina. 2005; 25: 208-211.
3. Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Murri S, Belting C, Vento A, Cresti F et al. 25-Gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 244: 472-479.
4. Okamoto F, Okamoto C, Sakata N, Hiratsuka K, Yamane N, Hiraoka T et al. Changes in corneal topography after 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus after 20-gauge standard vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 2138-2141.
5. Misra A, Ho-Yen G, Burton RL. 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and 20-gauge vitrectomy: a case series comparison. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23: 1187-1191.
6. Kellner L, Wimpissinger B, Stolba U, Brannath W, Binder S. 25-gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91: 945-948.
7. Patelli F, Radice P, Zumbo G, Frisone G, Fasolino G. 25-gauge macular surgery: results and complications. Retina. 2007; 27: 750-754.
8. Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sato T, Ohji M, Tano Y A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 93-102.
9. Chen JC. Sutureless pars plana vitrectomy through selfsealing sclerotomies. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114: 1273-1275.
10. Holladay JT, Cravy TV, Koch DD. Calculating the surgical induced refractive change following ocular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992; 18: 429-443.
11. Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Lecuen N, Barale PO, Bonnel S, Basli E et al. 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 249: 1811-1819.
12. Yoon YH, Kim DS, Kim JG, Hwang JU. Sutureless vitreoretinal surgery using a new 25- gauge transconjunctival system. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2006; 37: 12-19.
13. Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Murri S, Belting C, Vento A, Cresti F et al. 25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 244: 472-479.
14. Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, Uchio E, Yanagi Y, Tamaki Y, Araie M. Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142: 513-515.
15. Park DH, Shin JP, Kim SY. Surgically induced astigmatism in combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy: 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge standard vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 247: 1331-1337.
16. Galway G, Drury B, Cronin BG, Bourke RD A comparison of induced astigmatism in 20- vs 25-gauge vitrectomy procedures. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24: 315-317.
17. Nishino M, Eguchi H, Iwata A, Shiota H, Tanaka M, Tanaka T. Are topical steroids essential after an uneventful cataract surgery?. J Med Invest. 2009; 56: 11-15.
18. Hoshi S, Okamoto F, Hasegawa Y, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T et al. Time course of changes in aqueous flare intensity after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2012; 32: 1862-1867.
19. Teixeira A, Allemann N, Yamada AC, Uno F, Maia A, Bonomo PP. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in recently postoperative 23-gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy sutureless self-sealing sclerotomy. Retina. 2009; 29: 1305-1309.
20. Scott IU, Flynn Jr HW, Dev S, Shaikh S, Mittra RA, Arevalo JF et al. Endophthalmitis after 25-gauge and 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: incidence and outcomes. Retina. 2008; 28: 138-142.
21. Yamane S, Kadonosono K, Inoue M, Kobayashi S, Watanabe Y, Arakawa A. Effect of intravitreal gas tamponade for sutureless vitrectomy wounds: three-dimensional corneal and anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Retina. 2011; 31: 702-706.
22. Taban M, Ventura AA, Sharma S, Kaiser PK. Dynamic evaluation of sutureless vitrectomy wounds: an optical coherence tomography and histopathology study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 2221-2228.