Twitter in urology and other surgical specialties at global conferences

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 224-227

  Chung, Amanda ^a   Woo, Henry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical conference; Social media; Surgery; Twitter messaging; Urology

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; ORGANIZATION; PLASTIC SURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL MEDIA; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL MEDIA; SURGERY, PLASTIC; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84963684464     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ans.13393     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Matta R, Doiron C, Leveridge MJ. The dramatic increase in social media in urology. J. Urol. 2014; 192: 494-498.
2. Roupret M, Misrai V. [Exponential use of social media in medicine: example of the interest of Twitter((c)) in urology]. Prog. Urol. 2015; 25: 11-17.
3. Wilkinson SE, Basto MY, Perovic G, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy DG. The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings. BJU Int. 2015; 115: 839-846.
4. Loeb S. Social media makes global urology meetings truly global: the influence of Twitter. BJU Int. 2015; 115: 175.
5. Nason GJ, O'Kelly F, Kelly ME etal. The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals. BJU Int. 2015; 115: 486-490.
6. Misrai V, Castagnola C, Descotes JL, Roupret M. [Use of social media by French urologists: results from a study of the National French Urological Association]. Prog. Urol. 2015; 25: 428-434.
7. Davies N, Murphy DG, van Rij S, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N. Online and social media presence of Australian and New Zealand urologists. BJU Int. 2015; 116: 984-989.
8. Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C etal. Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association (AUA). BJU Int. 2014; 113: 993-998.
9. Ralston MR, O'Neill S, Wigmore SJ, Harrison EM. An exploration of the use of social media by surgical colleges. Int. J. Surg. 2014; 12: 1420-1427.
10. Cochran A, Kao LS, Gusani NJ, Suliburk JW, Nwomeh BC. Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress. J. Surg. Res. 2014; 190: 36-40.
11. Nason GJ, O'Kelly F, Bouchier-Hayes D, Quinlan DM, Manecksha RP. Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2015; 184: 685-689.
12. Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, Zheng K, Hollenbeck BK, Ghani KR. The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology meeting. J. Endourol. 2015; 29: 615-620.
13. Fuoco M, Leveridge MJ. Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists. BJU Int. 2015; 115: 491-497.
14. Murphy DG, Loeb S, Basto MY etal. Engaging responsibly with social media: the BJUI guidelines. BJU Int. 2014; 114: 9-11.
15. Roupret MMT, Bostrom PJ, Cooperberg MR etal. European association of urology (@uroweb) recommendations on the appropriate use of social media. Eur. Urol. 2014; 66: 628-632.
16. Wells DM, Lehavot K, Isaac ML. Sounding off on social media: the ethics of patient storytelling in the modern era. Acad. Med. 2015; 90: 1015-1019.