Risk factors for future repeat abdominal surgery

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 401, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 829-837

  Strik, Chema ^a   Stommel, Martijn W J ^a   Schipper, Laura J ^a   van Goor, Harry ^a   ten Broek, Richard P G ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abdominal adhesions; Abdominal surgery; Postoperative complications; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ABDOMINAL WALL; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); ELECTIVE SURGERY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INCISIONAL HERNIA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LIVER CANCER; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARASTOMAL HERNIA; PERITONEAL CAVITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEX; SURGICAL APPROACH; TISSUE ADHESION; TREATMENT INDICATION; ABDOMEN; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; LAPAROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TISSUE ADHESIONS; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISIONAL HERNIA; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 84963642709     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: 14352451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1414-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Christensen K et al (2009) Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 374(9696):1196–1208
2. Kwok AC et al (2011) The intensity and variation of surgical care at the end of life: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 378(9800):1408–1413
3. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study, G et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52
4. Fazio VW et al (2006) Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 49(1):1–11
5. ten Broek RP et al (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258(1):98–106
6. Beck DE et al (1999) Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 42(2):241–248
7. Parker MC et al (2001) Postoperative adhesions: 10-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(6):822–829, discussion 829–30
8. ten Broek RP, Strik C, van Goor H (2014) Preoperative nomogram to predict risk of bowel injury during adhesiolysis. Br J Surg 101(6):720–727
9. ten Broek RP et al (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588
10. ten Broek RP et al (2014) Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 383(9911):48–59
11. Helgstrand F et al (2013) Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216(2):217–228
12. Riss S et al (2013) Repeat intestinal resections increase the risk of recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 56(7):881–887
13. Zuhlke HV et al (1990) Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1009–16
14. Post S et al (1996) The impact of disease pattern, surgical management, and individual surgeons on the risk for relaparotomy for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 223(3):253–260
15. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135
16. de Jong MC et al (2009) Repeat curative intent liver surgery is safe and effective for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis: results from an international multi-institutional analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2141–2151
17. de Jong MC et al (2009) Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: an international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients. Ann Surg 250(3):440–448
18. (1988) The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part II. Factors associated with the disease. The Rome Group for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Hepatology 8(4)907–13
19. (1988) The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part I. Prevalence data in men. The Rome Group for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Hepatology 8(4)904–6
20. Chow A et al (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Color Dis 24(6):711–723
21. Klaristenfeld DD et al (2015) Significant reduction in the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic compared to open segmental colorectal resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(4):505–512
22. Becker JM et al (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183(4):297–306
23. Wilson MS et al (2002) Demonstrating the clinical and cost effectiveness of adhesion reduction strategies. Color Dis 4(5):355–360
24. Ten Broek RP et al (2016) Epidemiology and prevention of postsurgical adhesions revisited. Ann Surg 263(1):12–19
25. Dupre A et al (2013) Use of bioresorbable membranes to reduce abdominal and perihepatic adhesions in 2-stage hepatectomy of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: results of a prospective, randomized controlled phase II trial. Ann Surg 258(1):30–36
26. Stommel MW et al (2013) Adhesiolysis and adhesion prevention in 2-stage surgery. Ann Surg