Population-specific FST values for forensic STR markers: A worldwide survey

Forensic Science International: Genetics

Volumn 23, Issue , 2016, Pages 91-100

  Buckleton, John ^a,b   Curran, James ^c   Goudet, Jérôme ^d   Taylor, Duncan ^e,f   Thiery, Alexandre ^g   Weir, B S ^h  

^a MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^e FORENSIC SCIENCE SA   (Australia)

^f FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Coancestry; Forensic DNA; STR marker; Theta

Indexed keywords

DNA; GENETIC MARKER; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOSITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; ANCESTRY GROUP; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY THEORY;

CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY THEORY;

EID: 84963617153     PISSN: 18724973     EISSN: 18780326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. N.M. Silva, L. Pereira, E.S. Poloni, and M. Currat Human neutral genetic variation and forensic STR data PLoS ONE 7 2012 e49666
2. J.P. Pamplona, F. Freitas, and L. Pereira A worldwide database of autosomal markers used by the forensic community Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Suppl. Ser. 1 2008 656 657
3. ST estimates relative to five continental-scale populations Ann. Hum. Genet. 78 2014 468 477
4. C.B. Stringer, and P. Andrews Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans Science 239 1988 1263 1268
5. C.C. Cockerham Variance of gene frequencies Evolution 23 1969 72 84
6. S. Wright Evolution in Mendelian populations Genetics 16 1931 97 159
7. D.J. Balding, and R.A. Nichols DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands Forensic Sci. Int. 64 1994 125 140
8. National Research Council National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science, The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence 1996 National Academy Press Washington, DC
9. K.L. Ayres, and A.D.J. Overall Allowing for within-subpopulation inbreeding in forensic match probabilities Forensic Sci. Int. 103 1999 207 216
10. J.M. Curran, C.M. Triggs, J.S. Buckleton, and B.S. Weir Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations J. Forensic Sci. 44 1999 987 995
11. B.S. Weir The rarity of DNA profiles Ann. Appl. Stat. 1 2007 358 370
12. B.S. Weir, and C.C. Cockerham Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure Evolution 38 1984 1358 1370
13. B.S. Weir, and W.G. Hill Estimating F-statistics Ann. Rev. Genet. 36 2002 721 750
14. ST: the impact of rare variants Genome Res. 23 2013 1514 1521
15. T.J. Pemberton, M. DeGiorgio, and N.A. Rosenberg Population structure in a comprehensive genomic data set on human microsatellite variation G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 3 2013 891 907
16. J.M. Butler Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Interpretation 2014 Academic Press New York
17. D.C. Steele, and D.J. balding Choice of population database for forensic DNA profile analysis Sci. Justice 544 2014 487 493