Real-time variable-rate herbicide application for weed control in carrots

Weed Research

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 237-246

  Dammer, K H ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING AND BIOECONOMY ATB   (Germany)

Author keywords

Camera sensor; Daucus carota; Machine vision; Spraying technology

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; ARABLE LAND; CHEMICAL CONTROL; FIELD METHOD; HERBICIDE; MACHINERY; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; REAL TIME; ROOT VEGETABLE; SENSOR; SPRAY; WEED CONTROL; WILD POPULATION;

EUROPE;

DAUCUS CAROTA;

EID: 84963516035     PISSN: 00431737     EISSN: 13653180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/wre.12205     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agri Con (2015) Variable herbicide application will be reality. Available at: http://www.p3-sensor.de/produkte/h-sensor/ (last accessed 19 July 2015).
2. Andreasen C, Rudemo M & Sevestre S (1997) Assessment of weed density at an early stage by use of image processing. Weed Research 37, 5-18.
3. Anonymous (1972) Biometric Planning of Trials. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin, Germany.
4. Anonymous(2014a) Statistical Year Book About Nutrition, Agriculture and Forestry 2014. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster, Germany.
5. Anonymous (2014b) IUSS Working Group WRB: World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. World Soil Resources Reports 106, FAO, Rome.
6. Brown RB & Noble SD (2005) Site specific weed management: sensing requirements - what do we need to see? Weed Science 53, 252-258.
7. Chapron M, Requena-Esteso M, Boissard L & Assemat L (1999) A method for recognising vegetal species from multispectral images. In: Precision Agriculture '99(ed. JV Stafford ), 239-284. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK.
8. Christensen S (1994) Crop weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties. Weed Research 34, 29-36.
9. Christensen S, Sogaard HT, Kudsk P et al. (2009) Site specific weed control technologies. Weed Research 49, 233-241.
10. Courtney AD (1991) The role of competition in developing an appropriate rate strategy for weed control in spring barley. In: Proceedings of the 1991 BCPC Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds, (18-21 November, Brighton, UK). 1217-1224.
11. Dammer KH & Wartenberg G (2007) Real-time site specific weed management with variable herbicide rates. Crop Protection 26, 270-277.
12. Dammer KH, Wartenberg G & Weinhold F (2008) Differentiation of application rate in sensor based herbicide application under heterogenic age structure of weeds. Journal of Plant Diseases and ProtectionSpecial Issue XXI, 16, 1-166.
13. Dammer KH, Thöle H, Volk T & Hau B (2009) Variable-rate fungicide spraying in real time by combining a plant cover sensor and a decision support system. Precision Agriculture 10, 431-442.
14. Dammer KH, Wartenberg G & Weinhold F (2014) Site-specific herbicide splitting in field carrots based on camera detected weed infestation. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 443, 404-411.
15. Davis DHK, Fisher NM, Proven MJ, Whytock G & Courtney AD (1995) Risk evaluation of reduced dose approaches to weed control in cereals. In: Proceedings of the 9thEWRS Symposium volume 2, (Budapest, Hungary). 459-466.
16. Dogan MN(1999) Investigations on the efficacy of reduced herbicide doses depending on weed species, growth stage and environmental conditions. PhD thesis, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
17. Felton WL & McCloy KR (1992) Spot spraying. Agricultural Engineering 73, 9-12.
18. Gerhards R & Christensen S (2003) Real-time weed detection, decision making and patch spraying in maize, sugar beet, winter wheat and winter barley. Weed Research 43, 385-392.
19. Gerhards R & Oebel H (2006) Practical experiences with a system for site-specific weed control in arable crops using real-time image analysis and GPS controlled patch spraying. Weed Research 46, 185-193.
20. Grassimos GP, Weis M, Andujar D, Rueda VA & Gerhards R (2012) Potential use of ground-based sensor technologies for weed detection. Pest Management Science 70, 190-199.
21. Guyot G, Baret F & Jacquemoud S(1992)Imaging spectroscopy for vegetation studies. In: Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Prospective Application (eds F Toselli & J Bodechtel ), 145-165. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
22. Jensen PK & Kudsk P (1988) Prediction of herbicide activity. Weed Research 28, 473-478.
23. Kempenaar C, Lotz LAP, Snel JFH, Smutny V & Zhang HJ (2011) Predicting herbicidal plant mortality with mobile photosynthesis meters. Weed Research 51, 12-22.
24. Kim DS, Brain P, Marshall EJP & Caseley JC (2002) Modelling herbicide dose and weed density effects on crop: weed competition. Weed Research 42, 1-13.
25. Kluge A & Nordmeyer H (2009) Automated weed detection in winter wheat by using artificial neural network. Precision Agriculture 10, 321-327.
26. Krüger AD, Ketel H & Schmidt B (1996) Weed control with adjusted doses. Journal of Plant Diseases and ProtectionSpecial Issue XV, 45, 5-561.
27. Kudsk P (1989)Experiences with reduced herbicide doses in Denmark and the development of the concept of factor-adjusted doses. In: Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds, (Brighton, UK). 545-554.
28. Kudsk P (2014) Reduced herbicide rates: present and future. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 443, 37-44.
29. Marshall EJP (1988) Field-scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land. Weed Research 28, 191-198.
30. Rydahl P (2004) A danish decision system for sustainable weed management. Aspects of Applied Biology 72, 43-53.