‘Phases’ or ‘paradigms’ of science policy?

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 157-164

  Ruivo, Beatriz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962999145     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/spp/21.3.157     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Harvey Averch (1985) A Strategic Analysis of Science and Technology Policy (The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).
2. Stuart Blume (1985), The Development of Dutch Science Policy in International Perspective, 1965-1985, report to the Raad van Advies voor het Werenschaps beleid (RAWB), Study no 14.
3. Kenneth Boulding (1973), “The shadow of the stationary state”, in Mancur Olson and Hans Landsberg (editors), The No-growth Society (The Woburn Press, London) pages 89-101.
4. Harvey Brooks (1986), “National science policy and technological innovation”, in Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (editors), The Positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (National Academy Press, Washington) pages 119-167.
5. OECD (1971).
6. Robert Boyer (1988), “Technical change and the theory of regulation”, In Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerard Silverberg and Luc Soete (editors), Technical Change and Economic Theory (Pinter, London) pages 67-94 (The International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Studies Research Series no 6).
7. Susan Cozzens (1987), “Derek Price and the paradigm of science policy”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 13(3-4), pages 361-372.
8. S Dedijer (1964), “International comparisons of science”, New Scientist, 21 (379), pages 461-464.
9. David Dickson (1984, 1988), The New Politics of Science (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
10. Mark Dodgson and Roy Rothwell (1988), “Small firm policy in the UK”, Technovation, 7, pages 231-247.
11. Aant Elzinga (1988), “From criticism to evaluation”, in Andrew Jamison (editor), Keeping Science Straight. A Critical Look at the Assessment of Science and Technology, proceedings of a conference in Gothenburg, June 1987 (Department of Theory of Science and Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg) Report no 156, 10 May, pages 29-58.
12. Christopher Freeman (1974, 1982), The Economics of IndustrialInnovation (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth). Reprinted 2nd edition 1982 (Frances Pinter, London).
13. Christopher Freeman (1987), “Quantitative and qualitative factors in national policies for science and technology”, in Jan Anner- stedt (editor), From Research Policy to Social Intelligence. Essays in honour of Stevan Dedijer (Macmillan, London).
14. Christopher Freeman (1988), “Preface to part II”, in Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerard Silverberg and Luc Soete (editors), Technical Change and Economic Theory (Pinter, London) pages 9-12.
15. Jose Mariano Gago (1990), Manifesto para a Ciencia em Portugal. Ensaio (Gradiva, Lisboa).
16. John Irvine and Ben Martin (1984), Foresight in Science. Picking the Winners (Frances Pinter, London).
17. Sheila Jasanoff (1990), The Fifth Branch. Science Advisors and Policy Makers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge Ma).
18. Thomas Kuhn (1962, 1970), The Structure of Science Revolution. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2(2), 1970 second edition, enlarged.
19. OECD (1971), Science, Growth and Society—a New Perspective, Report of the Secretary-General’s Ad-Hoc Group on New Concepts of Science Policy (Chairman: Harvey Brooks) (Brooks’ Report) (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris).
20. M Polanyi (1962), “The republic of science: Its political and economic theory”, Minerva, 1 (1), pages 54-73.
21. Derek de Solla Price (1961), Science since Baylon (Yale University Press, New Haven).
22. Arie Rip and Rob Hagendijk (1988), “Implementation of science policy priorities”, Science Policy Support Group (SPSG) Concept Paper no 2, London
23. Rustum Roy (1985), “Funding science: The real defects of peer review and an alternative to it”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 10(3), pages 73-81.
24. Roy Rothwell and W Zegveld (1985), Reindustralisation and Technology (Longman, London).
25. Jean-Jacques Salomon (1973), Science and Politics, Translated from the French by N Lindsay (The MIT Press, Cambridge Ma).
26. Jean-Jacques Salomon (1977), “Science policy studies and the development of science policy”, in Ina Spiegel-Rosing and Derek de Solla Price (editors), Science, Technology and Society (Sage, London) pages 43-70.
27. Jean-Jacques Salomon (1989), “Criterios para urna política de ciencia e tecnología. De um paradigma a outro”, Revista Coloquio/Ciencias, pages 90-98.
28. John Ziman and Peter Healey (1988), “International selectivity in science”, Science Policy Support Group (SPSG) Concept Paper no 3, London.