An alternative strategy for targeted gene replacement in plants using a dual-sgRNA/Cas9 design

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Zhao, Yongping ^a   Zhang, Congsheng ^a,b   Liu, Wenwen ^a   Gao, Wei ^a   Liu, Changlin ^a   Song, Gaoyuan ^a   Li, Wen Xue ^a   Mao, Long ^a   Chen, Beijiu ^b   Xu, Yunbi ^a   Li, Xinhai ^a   Xie, Chuanxiao ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b ANHUI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CROP IMPROVEMENT; FLOWER; GENE DELETION; PLANT MODEL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; TRANSGENIC PLANT; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE EDITING; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE VECTOR; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; MUTATION; PLANT GENE; PROCEDURES;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; MICRORNA; MIRN169 MICRORNA, ARABIDOPSIS; MIRN827 MICRORNA, ARABIDOPSIS; PLANT RNA; TFL1 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE DELETION; GENE EDITING; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VECTORS; MICRORNAS; MUTATION; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RNA, PLANT; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84962909415     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep23890     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Gao, H. et al. Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease. The Plant Journal 61, 176-187, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04041.x (2009).
2. Porteus, M. H., Carroll, D. Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases. Nat Biotech 23, 967-973 (2005).
3. Reyon, D. et al. FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat Biotech 30, 460-465 (2012).
4. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821, doi: 10.1126/science.1225829 (2012).
5. Feng, Z. et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23, 1229-1232, doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.114 (2013).
6. Li, J.-F. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotech 31, 688-691, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654 (2013).
7. Miao, J. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Research 23, 1233-1236, doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.123 (2013).
8. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotech 31, 686-688, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650 (2013).
9. Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910-918 (2013).
10. Xie, K., Yang, Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants uing a CRISPR-Cas system. Molecular Plant 6, 1975-1983, doi: 10.1093/mp/sst119 (2013).
11. Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 12, 797-807, doi: 10.1111/pbi.12200 (2014).
12. Fan, D. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in populus in the first generation. Scientific Reports 5, 12217, doi: 10.1038/srep12217 (2015).
13. Sun, X. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Scientific Reports 5, 10342, doi: 10.1038/srep10342 (2015).
14. Xu, R.-F. et al. Generation of inheritable and "transgene clean" targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports 5, 11491, doi: 10.1038/srep11491 (2015).
15. Schiml, S., Fauser, F., Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. The Plant Journal 80, 1139-1150, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12704 (2014).
16. Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protocols 8, 2281-2308, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 (2013).
17. Puchta, H., Dujon, B., Hohn, B. Homologous recombination in plant cells is enhanced by in vivo induction of double strand breaks into DNA by a site-specific endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Research 21, 5034-5040, doi: 10.1093/nar/21.22.5034 (1993).
18. Voytas, D. F., Gao, C. Precision genome engineering and agriculture: opportunities and regulatory challenges. PLoS Biol 12, e1001877, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001877 (2014).
19. Brandl, C. et al. Creation of targeted genomic deletions using TALEN or CRISPR/Cas nuclease pairs in one-cell mouse embryos. FEBS Open Bio 5, 26-35, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2014.11.009 (2015).
20. Xiao, A. et al. Chromosomal deletions and inversions mediated by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas in zebrafish. Nucleic Acids Research, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt464 (2013).
21. Svitashev, S. et al. Targeted Mutagenesis, Precise Gene Editing, and Site-Specific Gene Insertion in Maize Using Cas9 and Guide RNA. Plant Physiology 169, 931-945, doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00793 (2015).
22. Ishida, Y., Hiei, Y., Komari, T. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize. Nat. Protocols 2, 1614-1621 (2007).
23. Fauser, F., Schiml, S., Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 79, 348-359, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12554 (2014).
24. Li, W.-X. et al. The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. The Plant Cell 20, 2238-2251, doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.059444 (2008).
25. Zhao, M., Ding, H., Zhu, J.-K., Zhang, F., Li, W.-X. Involvement of miR169 in the nitrogen-starvation responses in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 190, 906-915, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03647.x (2011).
26. Svitashev, S. et al. Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiology (in press), doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00793 (2015).
27. Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380-1389 (2013).
28. Shen, B. et al. Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects. Nat Meth 11, 399-402, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2857 (2014).
29. Canver, M. C. et al. Characterization of Genomic Deletion Efficiency Mediated by Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 Nuclease System in Mammalian Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 289, 21312-21324, doi: 10.1074/jbc. M114.564625 (2014).
30. Essletzbichler, P. et al. Megabase-scale deletion using CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a fully haploid human cell line. Genome Research 24, 2059-2065, doi: 10.1101/gr.177220.114 (2014).
31. Platt, Randall J. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell 159, 440-455, doi: 10.1016/j. cell.2014.09.014 (2015).
32. Zhu, Z., Verma, N., Gonzalez, F., Shi, Z.-D., Huangfu, D. A CRISPR/Cas-mediated selection-free knockin strategy in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 4, 1103-1111, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.04.016 (2015).
33. Ruan, J. et al. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated transgene knockin at the H11 locus in pigs. Scientific Reports 5, 14253, doi: 10.1038/srep14253 (2015).
34. Schaeffer, S. M., Nakata, P. A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: Transitioning from lab to field. Plant Science 240, 130-142, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.011 (2015).
35. Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P., Bartel, B. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57, 19-53, doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105218 (2006).
36. Voinnet, O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 136, 669-687 (2009).
37. Xu, Z. et al. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in response to low nitrate availability in maize leaves and roots. PLoS ONE 6, e28009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028009 (2011).
38. Zhao, Y. et al. Combined small RNA and degradome sequencing reveals novel miRNAs and their targets in response to low nitrate availability in maize. Annals of Botany 112, 633-642, doi: 10.1093/aob/mct133 (2013).
39. Krysan, P. J., Young, J. C., Sussman, M. R. T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 11, 2283-2290, doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.12.2283 (1999).
40. Azpiroz-Leehan, R., Feldmann, K. A. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: going back and forth. Trends in Genetics 13, 152-156, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01094-9 (1997).
41. Feng, Z. et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 4632-4637, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111 (2014).
42. Wang, Z.-P. et al. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biology 16, 144 (2015).
43. Monna, L. et al. Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice "Green Revolution Gene" encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Research 9, 11-17 (2002).
44. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823, doi: 10.1126/science.1231143 (2013).
45. Clough, S. J., Bent, A. F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16, 735-743, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x (1998).
46. Llave, C., Xie, Z., Kasschau, K. D., Carrington, J. C. Cleavage of scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science 297, 2053-2056, doi: 10.1126/science.1076311 (2002).