HTTP/2-based methods to improve the live experience of adaptive streaming

MM 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Multimedia Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 541-550

  Huysegems, Rafael ^a   Bostoen, Tom ^a   Alface, Patrice Rondao ^a   Van Der Hooft, Jeroen ^b   Petrangeli, Stefano ^b   Wauters, Tim ^b   De Turck, Filip ^b  

^a LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

DASH; HTTP adaptive streaming; HTTP 2; Latency; Live streaming; Server push; SPDY; Video streaming

Indexed keywords

HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; VIDEO STREAMING;

ADAPTIVE STREAMING; DASH; LATENCY; LIVE STREAMING; SERVER PUSHES; SPDY;

HTTP;

EID: 84962892248     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806264     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. S. Akhshabi, L. Anantakrishnan, C. Dovrolis, and A. C. Begen. Server-Based Traffic Shaping for Stabilizing Oscillating Adaptive Streaming Players. In NOSSDAV, 2013.
2. M. Belshe, R. Peon, and M. Thomson. Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2. Technical Report Internet-Draft, 2015.
3. S. Benno, A. Beck, J. Esteban, L. Wu, and R. Miller. WiLo: A Rate Determination Algorithm for HAS Video in Wireless Networks and Low-Delay Applications. In Globecom Workshops, 2013.
4. bitmovin. libdash. https://github.com/bitmovin/libdash/.
5. G. Bjontegaard. Calculation of Average PSNR Differences between RD-Curves. In ITU-T SG16/Q.6, Doc. VCEG-M033, 2001.
6. N. Bouten, M. Claeys, S. Latré, J. Famaey, W. Van Leekwijck, and F. De Turck. Deadline-Based Approach for Improving Delivery of SVC-Based HTTP Adaptive Streaming Content. In NOMS, 2014.
7. N. Bouten, J. Famaey, S. Latré, R. Huysegems, B. Vleeschauwer, W. Leekwijck, and F. De Turck. QoE Optimization Through In-Network Quality Adaptation for HTTP Adaptive Streaming. In CNSM, 2012.
8. A. Cardaci, L. Caviglione, A. Gotta, and N. Tonellotto. Performance Evaluation of SPDY over High Latency Satellite Channels. Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. 2013.
9. M. Claeys, S. Latré, J. Famaey, T. Wu, W. Van Leekwijck, and F. De Turck. Design of a Q-Learning-Based Client Quality Selection Algorithm for HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming. In AAMAS, 2013.
10. Conviva. Viewer Experience Report 2014. 2014.
11. F. Dobrian, V. Sekar, A. Awan, I. Stoica, D. Joseph, A. Ganjam, J. Zhan, and H. Zhang. Understanding the Impact of Video Quality on User Engagement. SIGCOMM, 2011.
12. Y. Elkhatib, G. Tyson, and M. Welzl. Can SPDY Really Make the Web Faster? In IFIP, 2014.
13. J. Erman, V. Gopalakrishnan, R. Jana, and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Towards a SPDY'Ier Mobile Web? In CoNEXT, 2013.
14. J. Famaey, S. Latré, N. Bouten, W. Van de Meerssche, B. De Vleeschauwer, W. Van Leekwijck, and F. De Turck. On the Merits of SVC-based HTTP Adaptive Streaming. In IFIP, 2013.
15. FCC. Measuring Broadband America. http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/measuringbroadbandreport /2013/Measuring-Broadband-America-feb-2013.pdf, 2013.
16. Google. SPDY: An Experimental Protocol for a Faster Web. Technical report, 2009.
17. R. Huysegems, B. De Vleeschauwer, K. De Schepper, C. Hawinkel, T. Wu, K. Laevens, and W. Van Leekwijck. Session Reconstruction for HTTP Adaptive Streaming: Laying the Foundation for Network-Based QoE Monitoring. In IWQoS, 2012.
18. IETF. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (httpbis). 2012.
19. Igvita. High Performance Browser Networking. O'Reilly, 2014.
20. iMinds. Virtual Wall. http://ilabt.iminds.be/iminds-virtualwall-overview/.
21. T. Lohmar, T. Einarsson, P. Frojdh, F. Gabin, and M. Kampmann. Dynamic Adaptive HTTP Streaming of Live Content. In WoWMoM, 2011.
22. R. K. P. Mok, X. Luo, E. W. W. Chan, and R. K. C. Chang. QDASH: A QoE-Aware DASH System. In MMsys, 2012.
23. C. Mueller, S. Lederer, C. Timmerer, and H. Hellwagner. Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP/2.0. In ICME, 2013.
24. C. Müller, S. Lederer, and C. Timmerer. An Evaluation of Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP in Vehicular Environments. In MoVid, 2012.
25. C. Müller, D. Renzi, S. Lederer, S. Battista, and C. Timmerer. Using Scalable Video Coding for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP in Mobile Environments. In EUSIPCO, 2012.
26. S. Petrangeli, M. Claeys, S. Latré, J. Famaey, and F. De Turck. A Multi-Agent Q-Learning-Based Framework for Achieving Fairness in HTTP Adaptive Streaming. In NOMS, 2014.
27. S. Petrangeli, J. Famaey, M. Claeys, S. Latré, and F. De Turck. QoE-driven Rate Adaptation Heuristic for Fair Adaptive Video Streaming. ACM TOMM, 2015.
28. Y. Sánchez de la Fuente, T. Schierl, C. Hellge, T. Wiegand, D. Hong, D. De Vleeschauwer, W. Van Leekwijck, and Y. Le Louédec. iDASH: Improved Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP Using Scalable Video Coding. In MMSys, 2011.
29. Y. Sánchez de la Fuente, T. Schierl, C. Hellge, T. Wiegand, D. Hong, D. De Vleeschauwer, W. Van Leekwijck, and Y. Le Louédec. Eficient HTTP-Based Streaming Using Scalable Video Coding. In MMSys, 2012.
30. Sandvine. Global Internet Phenomena Report, 1H 2014. 2014.
31. T. Stockhammer. Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP: Standards and Design Principles. In ACM MM, 2011.
32. S. Tavakoli, J. Gutierrez, and N. Garcia. Subjective Quality Study of Adaptive Streaming of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Video. Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 2014.
33. M. Team. MiniNet. http://mininet.org/.
34. T. Tsujikawa. nghttp2. https://nghttp2.org/.
35. Webtide. Jetty. https://webtide.com/.
36. S. Wei and V. Swaminathan. Cost Effective Video Streaming Using Server Push over HTTP 2.0. In MMSP, 2014.
37. S. Wei and V. Swaminathan. Low Latency Live Video Streaming over HTTP 2.0. In NOSSDAV, 2014.