Accessibility modeling in earthquake case considering road closure probabilities: A case study of health and shelter service accessibility in Thessaloniki, Greece

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Volumn 17, Issue , 2016, Pages 49-66

  Ertugay, Kivanc ^a   Argyroudis, Sotiris ^b   Düzgün, H Şebnem ^c  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^c MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Accessibility modeling; Disaster emergency management; Earthquake; Health services; Location allocation; Road closure probability; Road network; Service area; Shelter sites; Vulnerability of city infrastructures and urban districts

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962802961     PISSN: 22124209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Akkar S., Bommer J.J. Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region and the Middle East. Seism. Res. Lett. 2010, 812:195-206.
2. Alipour A., Shafei B., Shinozuka M. Performance evaluation of deteriorating highway bridges in high seismic areas. J. Bridge Eng. 2011, 597-611. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000197.
3. Alipour A., Shafei B. Seismic resilience of transportation networks with deteriorating components. J. Struct. Eng. 2016, C4015015. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399.
4. Argyroudis S., Kaynia A.M. Fragility functions of highway and railway infrastructure. SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk 2014, Springer, The Netherlands. K. Pitilakis, H. Crowley, A. Kaynia (Eds.).
5. Argyroudis S., Selva J., Gehl P., Pitilakis K. Systemic seismic risk assessment of road networks considering interactions with the built environment. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 2015, 30(7):524-540.
6. Argyroudis S., Selva J., Kakderi K., Pitilakis K. Application to the city of Thessaloniki. SYNER-G: Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Complex Urban, Utility, Lifeline Systems and Critical Facilities. Methodology and Applications. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering 2014, 31. Springer, Netherlands. K. Pitilakis, P. Franchin, B. Khazai, H. Wenzel (Eds.).
7. Biondini F., Camnasio E., Titi A. Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2015, 44:2445-2466. 10.1002/eqe.2591.
8. Bixby L.R. Spatial access to health care in Costa Rica and its equity: a GIS-based study. Soc. Sci. Med. 2004, 1271-1284.
9. M. Black, S. Ebener, M. Vidaurre, P.N. Aguilar, Z. El Morjani, Using GIS to Measure Physical Accessibility to Health Care,in: Health GIS Conference Proceedings, International ESRI User Conference, San Diego, 2004.
10. Boulos M.N., Roudsari A.V., Carson E.R. Health Geomatics: an enabling suite of technologies in health and healthcare. J. Biomed. Info. 2001, 34(3):195-219. Published: 22 September 2006.
11. Brabyn L., Skelly C. Modeling population access to New Zealand public hospitals. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2002, 1:1-3. Published online 2002 November 12. 10.1186/1476-072X-1-3.
12. L. Brabyn, Modelling Population Access to New Zealand's General Practitioners, International ESRI User Conference, San Diego, 2002.
13. P. Chapelet, B. Lefebvre, Contextualizing the Urban Healthcare System, Methodology for developing a geodatabase of Delhi's healthcare system, CSH Occasional Paper No. 11, Publication of the French Research Institutes in India, Rajdhani Art Press, New Delhi, 2005, 135p.
14. Q. Chen, Measuring Accessibility in GIS. 〈〉 (visited on 7.01.02). http://mather.ar.utexas.edu/students/cadlab/chen/measuring_accessibility_in_gis.htm.
15. Dodge M., White S. GIS and public services in Wales: analyzing supply and demand for healthcare and education. Mapp. Aware J. 1995, 9(7).
16. Ebener S., El Morjani Z., Ray N., Black M. Physical accessibility to health care: from isotropy to anisotropy. Glob. Geospat. Mag. 2005, GISatdevelopment.
17. M.P. Emelinda, K.S. Shashi, GIS-Based Allocation of Emergency Response Units Along a Transportation Route, in: ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, 1995.
18. Ertugay K., Düzgün H.S.B. GIS based stochastic modeling of physical accessibility by using GPS Based floating car data and Monte Carlo Simulations. Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci. 2011, 25(9).
19. Ertugay K., Düzgün H.S.B. GIS Based Stochastic Modeling of Physical Accessibility by Using GPS Based Floating Car Data and Monte Carlo Simulations (PhD Thesis) 2011, Geodetic and Geographic Information Technologies Department, Turkey, Submitted to the Graduate School Of Natural And Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, September 2011.
20. Ertugay K., Duzgun S.H. Understanding accessibility: accessibility modeling with geographical information systems (GIS). Using Decision Support Systems for Transportation Planning Efficiency 2016, 223-257. Engineering Science Reference, Hershey, PA. 10.4018/978-1-4666-8648-9.ch009. E. Ocalir-Akunal (Ed.).
21. ESRI ArcGIS User Manual 2011, Environmental Systems Research Institute, USA.
22. FEMA HAZUS-MH Technical Manual 2003, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA.
23. Fortney J., Rost K., Warren J. Comparing alternative methods of measuring geographic access to health services. J. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 2000, 1(2):173-184. Springer, June.
24. Franchin P., Lupoi A., Pinto P.E. On the role of road networks in reducing human losses after earthquakes. J. Earthq. Eng. 2006, 10(2):195-206.
25. Franchin P., Cavalieri F. Seismic vulnerability analysis of a complex interconnected civil infrastructure. Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems 2013, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK. S. Tesfamariam, K. Goda (Eds.).
26. C. Ghio, L. Mark, N. Abdulkadir, A. Ahmed, Health GIS Tools and applications informing decisions in Yemen, Geospatial Application Papers, 2007. 〈〉 (last visited on 01.01.09). http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/health/overview/me05_012a.htm.
27. Giardini D., et al. Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE). Online Data Resour. 2013, 10.12686/SED-00000001-SHARE.
28. Ghosh J., Padgett J.E. Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. J. Struct. Eng. 2010, 136(12):1497-1511.
29. A. Goretti, A probabilistic model able to handle interaction among road network,buildings and emergency services in urban areas. in: Proceedings of the IX International Conference On Structural Safety And Reliability, ICOSSAR'05, Rome, 19-23 June, 2005.
30. Goulias K.G. An Optimal Resource Allocation Tool for Urban Development Using GIS-based Accessibility Measures and Stochastic Frontier Analysis 2007, University of California, United States, Santa Barbara California PATH Research Report, UCB-ITS-PRR-2007-7.
31. Halden D., Mcguigan D., Nisbet A., Mckinnon A. Guidance On Accessibility Measuring Techniques and Their Application 2000, Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, Scotland, ISBN: 1842680013 (visited on 11.11.01). http://www.scotland.gov.uk/cru/kd01/blue/guidance.pdf.
32. Hélène C., Evelyne C. Poor prenatal care in an urban area: a geographic analysis. J. Health Place 2008, 15:412-419.
33. Joseph P.M., Ashton M.S., Richard E.G., Pariwate V., Mark J.F. Evaluating Michigan's community hospital access: spatial methods for decision support. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2006, 5:42. 10.1186/1476-072X-5-42.
34. R.P. Juliao, Measuring Accessibility Using GIS, Geo-computation-99, 1999. 〈〉 (visited on 17.12.01). http://www.geovista.psu.edu/sites/geocomp99/Gc99/010/gc010.ppt.
35. Kiremidjian A., Moore J., Fan Y.Y., Yazlali O., Basoz N., Williams M. Seismic risk assessment of transportation networks. J. Earthq. Eng. 2007, 11:371-382.
36. Kuwata Y., Takada S. Effective emergency transportation for saving human lives. Nat. Hazards 2004, 33:23-46.
37. Kwan M.P. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geogr. Anal. 1998, 30:191-216.
38. Lotfi S., Koohsari M.J. Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city (A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran). Cities 2009, 26:133-140.
39. Luo W. Using a GIS-based floating catchment method to assess areas with shortage of physicians. Health Place 2004, 10:1-11.
40. Luo W., Wang F. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 2003, 30:865-884.
41. Makri M.C., Folkesson C. Accessibility Measures for Analyses of Land-Use and Travelling with Geographical Information Systems 1999, Aalborg University publications.
42. M.B. Makrí, Accessibility indices and planning theory, in: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century, Urban Transport VIII, 2002, pp. 37-46.
43. Matthew R., McGrail J., Humphreys S. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas: improving the effectiveness of the two-step floating catchment area method. Appl. Geogr. 2009, 29:533-541.
44. Murad A.A. Creating a GIS application for local health care planning in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2004, 14(3):185-199.
45. Nadine S., Robert S.F., Stefan C.W.G., Darrin G. Defining rational hospital catchments for non-urban areas based on travel-time. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2006, 5:43. 10.1186/1476-072X-5-43.
46. Ní Choine M., O'Connor A., Padgett J. Comparison between the Seismic Performance of Integral and Jointed Concrete Bridges. J. Earthq. Eng. 2015, 172-191. 10.1080/13632469.2014.946163.
47. O'Sullivan D., Alastair M., John S. Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: an isochrone approach. Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci. 2000, 14(1):85-104.
48. K. Pitilakis, H. Crowley, A.M. Kaynia (eds.), SYNER-G: Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk, Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, 27, Springer, Netherlands, 2014a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6.
49. K. Pitilakis, P. Franchin, B. Khazai, H. Wenzel (eds.), SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities. Methodology and applications, Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 2014. (under production).
50. van Eck J.R.Ritsema, de Jong T. Accessibility analysis and spatial competition efects in the context of GIS-supported service location planning. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 1999, 23:75-89.
51. Scott J., Larson A., Jefferies F., Veenendaal B. Small-area estimates of general practice workforce shortage in rural and remote Western Australia. Aust. J. Rural Health 2006, 14(5):209-213.
52. Stergiou E.C., Kiremidjian A.S. Risk assessment of transportation systems with network functionality losses. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2010, 6(1-2):111-125.
53. D. Sylvie, Gis-Based Accessibility Analysis for Network Optimal Location Model, Article 407, Cybergeo, Systems, Modelisation Geostatistiques, 2007.
54. SYNER-G, Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk analysis for buildings, lifeline networks and infrastructures safety gain, European Collaborative research project (FP7/2007-2013), 2013). 〈〉. http://www.syner-g.eu.
55. Transportation Statistics Annual Report, Mobility, Access and Transportation, 1997. 〈〉 (last visited on 23.12.06). http://www.bts.gov/transtu/tsar/tsar97/chap06.pdf.
56. Tsionis G., Fardis M. Fragility functions of road and railway bridges. SYNER-G: Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk 2014, Springer, The Netherlands. K. Pitilakis, H. Crowley, A. Kaynia (Eds.).
57. R. Umitsu, M. Fushimi, Shortest Path Problems for Ambulances in Case of Severe Earthquakes, in: The Sixth International Symposium on Operations Research and Its Applications (ISORA'06), Xinjiang, China, August 8-12, 2006, pp. 283-291.
58. Vahidnia M.H., Alesheikh A.A., Alimohammadi A. Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:3048-3056.
59. Yang D.H., Robert G., Ross M. Comparing GIS-based methods of measuring spatial accessibility to health services. J. Med. Syst. 2006, 30(1):23-32.
60. Zanini M.A., Pellegrino C., Morbin R., Modena C. Seismic vulnerability of bridges in transport networks subjected to environmental deterioration. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2013, 11(2):561-579.