United we stand: Improving sentiment analysis by joining machine learning and rule based methods

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1089-1094

  Rentoumi, Vassiliki ^a,b   Petrakis, Stefanos ^c   Klenner, Manfred ^c   Vouros, George A ^b   Karkaletsis, Vangelis ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA MINING; SPEECH PROCESSING;

JOINING MACHINE; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; MACHINE LEARNING METHODS; RULE-BASED APPROACH; RULE-BASED METHOD; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84962791085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. A. Andreevskaia and S. Bergler. 2008. When specialists and generalists work together: overcoming domain dependence in sentiment tagging. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages:290-298, 2008.
2. Y. Choi and C Cardie. 2008. Learning with compositional semantics as structural inference for subsentential sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 793-801, 2008, Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. D.A. Cruse. 2000. Meaning in language. Oxford University Press.
4. M. Gamon and A. Aue. 2005. Automatic identification of sentiment vocabulary exploiting low association with known sentiment terms. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Feature Engineering for Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing, 57-64.
5. G. Giannakopoulos, V. Karkaletsis, G. Vouros, and P. Stamatopoulos. 2008. Summarization system evaluation revisited: N-gram graphs. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing (TSLP), 5(3).
6. M. Klenner, S. Petrakis, and A. Fahrni. 2009. Robust compositional polarity classification. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), Borovets, Bulgaria.
7. Karo Moilanen and Stephen Pulman. 2007. Sentiment composition. In Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing International Conference (RANLP-2007), pages 378-382, Borovets, Bulgaria, September 27-29.
8. T. Pedersen, S. Banerjee, and S. Patwardhan. 2005. Maximizing semantic relatedness to perform word sense disambiguation. Supercomputing institute research report umsi, 25.
9. L. Polanyi and A. Zaenen. 2004. Contextual valence shifters. Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, pages 1-9.
10. V. Rentoumi, V. Karkaletsis, G. Vouros, and A. Mozer. 2008. Sentiment analysis exploring metaphorical and idiomatic senses: A word sense disambiguation approach. Proccedings of International Workshop on Computational Aspects of Affectual and Emotional Interaction (CAFFEi 2008).
11. V. Rentoumi, G. Giannakopoulos, V. Karkaletsis, and G. Vouros. 2009. Sentiment analysis of figurative language using a word sense disambiguation approach. In Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), Borovets, Bulgaria.
12. C. Strapparava and R. Mihalcea. 2007. SemEval-2007 Task 14: Affective Text. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval 2007), Prague, Czeck Republic, pages 70-74.
13. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In HLT/EMNLP.