Factors affecting mode of delivery in a nullipara at term with singleton pregnancy and vertex presentation (NTSV)

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 314-318

  Ahmed, Iffat ^a   Chishti, Uzma ^a   Akhtar, Munazza ^a   Ismail, Humaira ^a  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; Induction of labour; Low risk pregnancy; Nulliparous; Singleton pregnancy; Term pregnancy; Vertex presentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; NIGHT TIME DELIVERY; NULLIPARA; PAKISTAN; PREGNANCY; PROLONGED LABOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SINGLETON PREGNANCY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; VERTEX PRESENTATION;

EID: 84962786170     PISSN: 1682024X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.322.9138     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sharma V, Colleran G, Dineen B, Hession MB, Avalos G, Morrison JJ. Factors influencing delivery mode for nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation during a 17-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147(2):173-177. doi: S0301-2115(09)00504-1[pii]10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.015
2. Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, Liston R, Kramer MS, Wen SW, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(8):735-742.
3. Joseph KS, Young DC, Dodds L, O’Connell CM, Allen VM, Chandra S, et al. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(4):791-800.
4. Kottmel A, Hoesli I, Traub R, Urech C, Huang D, Leeners B, et al. Maternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(1):93-98. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2273-y
5. Kingdon C, Baker L, Lavender T. Systematic review of nulliparous women›s views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial. Birth. 2006;33(3):229-237. doi: BIR108 [pii] 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00108.x
6. Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1511-1515. doi: S0002937804007501[pii]10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.001
7. Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essen B. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: A panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:107. doi: 1471-2393-13-107 [pii] 10.1186/1471-2393-13-107
8. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Ford JB, Todd AL, Morris JM. Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5). doi: bmjopen-2012-001725 [pii] 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001725
9. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(2):240-244.
10. Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5065. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5065
11. Sheikh L, Tehseen S, Gowani SA, Bhurgri H, Rizvi JH, Kagazwala S. Reducing the rate of primary caesarean sections--an audit. J Pak Med Assoc. 2008;58(8):444-448.
12. Webb DA, Culhane J. Time of day variation in rates of obstetric intervention to assist in vaginal delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(8):577-578.
13. Rohr Thomsen C, Uldbjerg N, Hvidman L, Atladottir HO, Henriksen TB, Milidou I. Seasonal variation of dystocia in a large Danish cohort. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094432
14. Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693-711. doi: 10.1097/01. AOG.0000444441.04111.1d.
15. Walsh JM, Hehir MP, Robson MS, Mahony RM. Mode of delivery and outcomes by birth weight among spontaneous and induced singleton cephalic nulliparous labors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(01):22-25. doi: S0020-7292(14)00641-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.029
16. Sandmire HF DR. The Green Bay Cesarean Section Study. IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(5):1557-1564.
17. Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ, Team AS. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):353-367. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh401