Emission allocation problems in the maritime logistics chain

EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 35-54

  Zhu, Wenting ^a   Erikstad, Stein Ove ^a   Nowark, Matthias Peter ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b SINTEF OCEAN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Allocation principles; Allocation schemes; CO 2 emissions; Maritime logistics chains

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962744422     PISSN: 21924376     EISSN: 21924384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13676-013-0029-x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Asbjørnslett BE, Lindstad H, Mørkve OT (2010) Energy efficiency and environmental performance of maritime logistics chains: estimating the current situation—major challenges and possible pitfalls. In: 12th World Conference on Transport Research (12th WCTR), Lisbon, Portugal
2. 2 emissions of international freight transport and offshoring: measurement and allocation. Ecol Econ 69(8):1682–1694
3. 2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Tech Rep, Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton
4. den Elzen M, Olivier J, Berk M (2007) An analysis of options for including international aviation and marine emissions in a post-2012 climate mitigation regime. Tech Rep, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP)
5. den Elzen MG, Beltran AMJ, Hof AF, van Ruijven B, van Vliet J (2013) Reduction targets and abatement costs of developing countries resulting from global and developed countries reduction targets by 2050. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18:491–512
6. Faber J, Markowska A, Nelissen D, Davidson M, Eyring S, Cionni I, Selstad E, Kgeson P, Lee D, Buhaug y, Lindtsad H, Roche P, Humpries E, Graichen J, Games M, Schwarz W (2009) Technical support for european action to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international maritime transport. Tech Rep, CE Delft
7. Fet AM, Michelsen O, Johnsen T (2000) Environmental performance of transportation—a comparative study. Tech Rep, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
8. Figliozzi M (2006) Analysis and evaluation of incentive-compatible dynamic mechanisms for carrier collaboration. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1966:34–40
9. Frisk M, Gothe-Lundgren M, Jornsten K, Ronnqvist M (2010) Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation. Eur J Oper Res 205(2):448–458
10. Groenenberg H, Blok K (2002) Benchmark-based emission allocation in a cap-and-trade system. Clim Policy 2(1):105–109
11. Hagemester C, Kristensen HOH (2011) Environmental performance evaluation of popax ferries. Ship Offshore 3:10–14
12. Heitmann N, Khalilian S (2011) Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping: burden sharing under different unfccc allocation options and regime scenarios. Mar Policy 35(5):682–691
13. Houghtalen LM (2007) Designing allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology
14. IMO (2000) Study of greenhouse gas emissions from ships. Tech Rep, Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute—MARINTEK
15. Jackson T, Papathanasopoulou E, Bradley P, Druckman A (2006) Attributing UK carbon emissions to functional consumer needs: methodology and pilot results. Tech Rep, University of Surrey
16. Kontovas C, Psaraftis HN (2011) Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain: operational models and policies. Marit Policy Manag 38(4):451–469
17. Krajewska MA (2007) Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing. J Oper Res Soc 59(11):1483–1491
18. Leonardi J, McKinnon A, Palmer A (2010) Guidance on measuring and reporting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from freight transport operations. Tech Rep, The UK’s Department for Transport (DfT)
19. LIPASTO (2009) Methodology for unit emissions of ships. http://lipasto.vtt.fi/yksikkopaastot/indexe.htm
20. MARLEN (2010) MARLEN methodology for calculating GEEC. Tech Rep, MARINTEK, DNV
21. McKinnon AC (2010) Product-level carbon auditing of supply chains: environmental imperative or wasteful distraction. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 20(1/2):42–66
22. McKinnon AC, Cullinane S, Browne M, Whiteing A (2010) Green logistics: improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. Kogan Page, London
23. 2 emissions to customers on a distribution route. Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam
24. Olson EG (2010) Challenges and opportunities from greenhouse gas emissions reporting and independent auditing. Manag Audit J 25(9):934–942
25. Rajagopal D, Zilberman D (2010) On environmental lifecycle assessment for policy selection. Tech Rep, University of California. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/39k9h976
26. Sagar AD (2000) Wealth, responsibility, and equity: exploring an allocation framework for global ghg emissions. Clim Change45(3):511–527
27. Sandvik ET (2005) Environmental impacts of intermodal freight transport. Tech Rep, Molde University College
28. SBSTA (1996) National communication by the subsidiary body for scientific and technological advice, fccc/sbsta/1996/9/add.1. Tech Rep
29. Sijm J, Jansen J, Torvanger A (2001) Differentiation of mitigation commitments: the multi-sector convergence approach. Clim Policy 1(4):481–497
30. UNFCCC (2003) UNFCCC (2003) caring for climate: a guide to the climate change convention and the kyoto protocol. Tech Rep, the Climate Change Secretariat UNFCCC Bonn, Germany
31. Vrenken H (2005) Intermodal transport in Europe. European Intermodal Association
32. Wick C, Klumpp M, Kandel C (2011) Shapley value simulation for allocating GHG emission savings due to logistics pooling within ECR cooperations. In: Novais P, Machado J, Analide C, Abelha A (eds) The 2011 European Simulation and Modelling Conference, University of Mino, Guimaraes. The European Technology Institute Bvba (ETI Bvba), Ostend, pp 240–244
33. 2 emission from aviation be allocated to reginal administrations fro monitoring and target setting. Tech Rep, Tyndall Centre, University of Manchester
34. Ziegler F, Hansson PA (2003) Emissions from fuel combustion in Swedish cod fishery. J Clean Prod 11(3):303–314