Centroid-based document classification: Analysis and experimental results

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1910, Issue , 2000, Pages 424-431

  Han, Eui Hong Sam ^a   Karypis, George ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING; NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH;

DIFFERENT CLASS; DIFFERENT DENSITIES; DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; DOCUMENT-BASED; K-NEAREST NEIGHBORS; NAIVE BAYESIAN; ROBUST PERFORMANCE; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84962671851     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45372-5_46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. L. Baker and A. McCallum. Distributional clustering of words for text classification. In SIGIR-98, 1998.
2. D. Boley, M. Gini, R. Gross, E.H. Han, K. Hastings, G. Karypis, V. Kumar, B. Mobasher, and J. Moore. Document categorization and query generation on the world wide web using WebACE. AI Review (accepted for publication), 1999.
3. W.W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In Proc. of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, 1995.
4. W.W. Cohen and H. Hirsh. Joins that generalize: Text classification using WHIRL. In Proc. of the Fourth Int’l Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1998.
5. th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Tucson, Arizona, 1997.
6. E.H. Han and G. Karypis. Centroid-based document classification algorithms: Analysis & experimental results. Technical Report TR-00-017, Department of Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2000. Available on the WWW at URL http://www.cs.umn.edu/~karypis.
7. W. Hersh, C. Buckley, T.J. Leone, and D. Hickam. OHSUMED: An interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research. In SIGIR-94, pages 192-201, 1994.
8. T. Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In Proc. of the European Conference on Machine Learning, 1998.
9. Wai Lam and Chao, Yang Ho. Using a generalized instance set for automatic text categorization. In SIGIR-98, 1998.
10. D. Lewis. Naive (bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In Tenth European Conference on Machine Learning, 1998.
11. D. D. Lewis. Reuters-21578 text categorization test collection distribution 1.0. http://www.research.att.com/-lewis, 1999.
12. A. McCallum and K. Nigam.Acomparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, 1998.
13. Andrew Kachites McCallum. Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ mccallum/bow, 1996.
14. M. F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3): 130-137, 1980.
15. J. Ross Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
16. G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
17. S. Shankar and G. Karypis.Afeature weight adjustment algorithm for document classification. In SIGKDD’00 Workshop on Text Mining, Boston, MA, 2000.
18. TREC. Text REtrieval conference. http://trec.nist.gov.
19. D. Wettschereck, D.W. Aha, and T. Mohri. A review and empirical evaluation of featureweighting methods for a class of lazy learning algorithms. AI Review, 11, 1997.
20. Y.Yang and X. Liu. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In SIGIR-99, 1999.