Valuation of ecosystem services to inform management of multiple-use landscapes

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 19, Issue , 2016, Pages 6-18

  Ma, Shan ^a   Duggan, Jennifer M ^a,b,e   Eichelberger, Bradley A ^a   McNally, Brynn W ^a   Foster, Jeffrey R ^c   Pepi, Eda ^a   Conte, Marc N ^a,f   Daily, Gretchen C ^a,d   Ziv, Guy ^a,g  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Joint Base Lewis McChord   (United States)

^d ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^e CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; InVEST; Military training; Public lands; Spatially explicit model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962641303     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bagstad K.J., Semmens D.J., Winthrop R. Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 5:40-50.
2. Bateman I.J., Harwood A.R., Mace G.M., Watson R.T., Abson D.J., Andrews B., Binner A., Crowe A., Day B.H., Dugdale S., Fezzi C., Foden J., Hadley D., Haines-Young R., Hulme M., Kontoleon A., Lovett A.A., Munday P., Pascual U., Paterson J., Perino G., Sen A., Siriwardena G., Van Soest D., Termansen M. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 2013, 341:45-50.
3. BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). (2012). Producer price index commodity data: all commodities. 2002-2011. Viewed 23 July 2012. http://www.bls.gov/data/.
4. Bhagabati N.K., Ricketts T., Sulistyawan T.B.S., Conte M., Ennaanay D., Hadian O., McKenzie E., Olwero N., Rosenthal A., Tallis H., Wolny S. Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 169:147-156.
5. Bossard C.C., Rejmanek M. Herbivory, growth, seed production, and resprouting of an exotic invasive shrub Cytisus scoparius. Biol. Conserv. 1994, 67:193-200.
6. Chappell C.B., Crawford R.C. Native vegetation of the South Puget Sound prairie landscape. Ecology and conservation of the South Puget Sound Prairie landscape 1997, 107-124. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle. P. Dunn, K. Ewing (Eds.).
7. Chastain R. Annual report to Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, US Army, Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Public Works, Environmental Division 2008, Forestry Branch.
8. Crawford R.C., Hall H. Changes in the South Puget Sound prairie landscape. Ecology and conservation of the South Puget Sound Prairie landscape 1997, 11-15. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle. P. Dunn, K. Ewing (Eds.).
9. Cowling R.M., Egoh B., Knight A.T., O'Farrell P.J., Reyers B., Rouget M., Roux D.J., Welz A., Wilhelm-Rechman A. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:9483-9488.
10. Daily G.C., Ouyang Z., Zheng H., Li S., Wang Y., Feldman M., Kareiva P., Polasky S., Ruckelshaus M. Securing natural capital and human well-being: innovation and impact in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2013, 33:669-676.
11. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., Ricketts T.H., Salzman J., Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:21-28.
12. Daily G.C., Ruckelshaus M.H., Ma S., Eichelberger B.A., Duggan J.M., Ghile Y.B., Kaiser G.M., McNally B.W., Ziv G., Conte M.N., Dennedy-Frank P.J., Rauer E.M. Enlisting Ecosystem Services: Quantification and Valuation of Ecosystem Services to Inform Base Management. DoD Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP), RC-201113 2015, ESTCP, Alexandria, VA, Available at:. http://https://www.serdp-estcp.org/Program-Areas/Resource-Conservation-and-Climate-Change/Natural-Resources/Watershed-Processes-and-Management/RC-201113.
13. Darris D., Johnson S., Bartow A. Plant fact sheet for Roemer's fescue (Festuca roemeri). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center 2012, USDA, Corvallis, OR.
14. De Lange H.J., Sala S., Vighi M., Faber J.H. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment- a review and perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:3871-3879.
15. DoD (Department of Defense) Instruction 4715.03 2011, Natural Resources Conservation Program, Washington D.C.
16. Duggan J.M., Eichelberger B.A., Ma S., Lawler J.J., Ziv G. Informing management of rare species with an approach combining scenario modeling and spatially explicit risk assessment. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2015, 1:1-18.
17. Dunn P. Prairie habitat restoration and maintenance on Fort Lewis and within the South Puget Sound prairie landscape. Final Report and Summary of Findings 1998, The Nature Conservancy, Seattle.
18. Folke C., Carpenter S., Walker B., Scheffer M., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 557-581.
19. Foster J. Laminated Root Rot at Fort Lewis: Current Status and Recommendations for Action 2009, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, U.S. Army, Fort Lewis.
20. Goldman-Benner R.L., Benitez S., Boucher T., Calvache A., Daily G., Kareiva P., Kroeger T., Ramos A. Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx 2012, 46:55-63.
21. Goldstein J.H., Caldarone G., Duarte T.K., Ennaanay D., Hannahs N., Mendoza G., Polasky S., Wolny S., Daily G.C. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:7565-7570.
22. Guerry A.D., Ruckelshaus M.H., Arkema K.K., Bernhardt J.R., Guannel G., Kim C.K., Marsik M., Papenfus M., Toft J.E., Verutes G., Wood S.A., Beck M., Chan F., Chan K.M.A., Gelfenbaum G., Gold B.D., Halpern B.S., Labiosa W.B., Lester S.E., Levin P.S., McField M., Pinsky M.L., Plummer M., Polasky S., Ruggiero P., Sutherland D.A., Tallis H., Day A., Spencer J. Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2012, 8:107-121.
23. Hansen E., Goheen E.M. Phellinus weirii and other native root pathogens as determinants of forest structure and process in western North America. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2000, 38:515-539.
24. Haynes R.W., Adams D.M., Alig R.J., Ince P.J., Mills J.R., Zhou.X. The 2005 Renewable Planning Act timber assessment update. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 2007, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
25. Hobday, A. J., Smith , A. D. M., Stobutzki, I. C., Bulman, C., Daley, R., Dambacher, J. M., Deng, R. A., Dowdney, J., Fuller, M., Furlani, D., Griffiths, S. P., Johnson, D., Kenyon, R., Knuckey, I. A., Ling, S. D., Pitcher, R., Sainsbury, K. J., Sporcic, M., Smith, T., Turnbull, C., Walker, T. I., Wayte, S. E., Webb, H., Williams, A., Wise, B. S., Zhou, S., 2011. Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing. Fisheries Research 108, 372-384.
26. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC NGGIP Programme 2006, IPCC-TSU/IGES. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan.
27. Kareiva P., Tallis H., Ricketts T.H., Daily G.C., Polasky S. Natural Capital: Theory and practice of mapping Ecosystem Services 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. Keith D.A., Rodríguez J.P., Rodríguez-Clark K.M., Nicholson E., Aapala K., Alonso A., Asmussen M., Bachman S., Basset A., Barrow E.G., Benson J.S., Bishop M.J., Bonifacio R., Brooks T.M., Burgman M.A., Comer P., Comin F.A., Essl F., Faber-Langendoen D., Fairweather P.G., Holdaway R.J., Jennings M., Kingsford R.T., Lester R.E., Mac Nally R., McCarthy M.A., Moat J., Oliveira-Miranda M.A., Pisanu P., Poulin B., Regan T.J., Riecken U., Spalding M.D., Zambrano-Martinez S. Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. PLoS One 2013, 8:e62111.
29. Kellndorfer J., Walker W., LaPoint E., Bishop J., Cormier T., Fiske G., Hoppus M., Kirsch K., Westfall J. NACP Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Baseline Data (NBCD 2000) 2012, The Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA.
30. Koschke L., Van der Meulen S., Frank S., Schneidergruber A., Kruse M., Fürst C., Neubert E., Ohnesorge B., Schröder C., Müller F., Bastian O. Do you have 5 min to spare? - The challenges of stakeholder processes in ecosystem services studies. Landsc. Online 2014, 37.
31. Liu J., Li S., Ouyang Z., Tam C., Chen X. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of china's policies for ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:9489-9494.
32. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington D.C.
33. McCauley K.J., Cook S.A. Phellinus weirii infestation of two mountain hemlock forests in the Oregon Cascades. For. Sci. 1980, 26:23-29.
34. E., McKenzie, A., Rosenthal, J., Bernhardt, E., Givetz, K., Kovacs, N., Olwero, & J., Toft (2012). Developing Scenarios to Assess Ecosystem Service Tradeoffs: Guidance and Case Studies for InVEST Users. World Wildlife Fund, Washington D.C. http://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/pubs/ScenariosGuide.pdf.
35. McNie E.C. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:17-38.
36. Menzel S., Teng J. Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:907.
37. Nelson E.E., Hartman T. Estimating spread of Poria weirii in a high elevation mixed conifer stand. J. For. 1975, 73:141-142.
38. Nemec K., Raudsepp-Hearne C. The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 2013, 22:1-15.
39. OMB (Office of Management and Budget) Circular A-94 Appendix C: Discount Rates for Cost-effectiveness, Lease purchase, and related Analyses 2011, OMB, Washington, DC.
40. Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:712-724.
41. Palomo I., Montes C., Martín-López B., Gonzalez J.A., Garcia-Llorente M., Alcorlo P., Garcia Mora M.R. Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the anthropocene. Bioscience 2014, 10.1093/biosci/bit033.
42. Peterson D.J., Prasad R. The biology of Canadian weeds. 109. Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1998, 78:497-504.
43. Polasky S., Nelson E., Pennington D., Johnson K.A. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 48:219-242.
44. Quist M.C., Fay P.A., Guy C.S., Knapp A.K., Rubenstein B.N. Military training effects on terrestrial and aquatic communities on a grassland military installation. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13:432-442.
45. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1933-1949.
46. Rodríguez J.P., Rodríguez-Clark K.M., Baillie J.E., Ash N., Benson J., Boucher T., Brown C., et al. Establishing IUCN Red List Criteria for Threatened Ecosystems. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 25:21-29.
47. Ruckelshaus M., McKenzie E., Tallis H., Guerry A., Daily G., Kareiva P., Polasky S., Ricketts T., Bhagabati N., Wood S.A., Bernhardt J. Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem services to inform real-world decisions. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009.
48. Scarlett L., Boyd.J. Ecosystem services and resource management: Institutional issues, challenges, and opportunities in the public sector. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.013.
49. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636.
50. Stein B.A., Scott C., Benton N. Federal lands and endangered species: the role of military and other federal lands in sustaining biodiversity. Bioscience 2008, 58:339-347.
51. Sharp, R., H. T. Tallis, T. Ricketts, A. D. Guerry, S. A. Wood, S.A., R. Chaplin-Kramer, E. Nelson, D. Ennaanay, S. Wolny, N. Olwero, K. Vigerstol, D. Pennington, G. Mendoza, J. Aukema, J. Foster, J. Forrest, D. Cameron, K. Arkema, E. Lonsdorf, C. Kennedy, G. Verutes, C. K. Kim, G. Guannel, M. Papenfus, J. Toft, M. Marsik, J. Bernhardt, R. Griffin, K. Glowinski, N. Chaumont, A. Perelman, M. Lacayo, L. Mandle, P. Hamel, and A. L. Vogl. 2014. InVEST user's guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford, Ca, USA. Available at: . http://ncp-dev.stanford.edu/~dataportal/invest-releases/documentation/current_release/.
52. USDA (US Department of Agriculture) Forest Service. (2012). National Forest System Land Management. Federal Register 77(68), 21162-21276. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
53. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2009). Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services. US EPA, EPA-SAB-09-012, Washington D.C.
54. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). (2013a). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status for the Taylor's checkerspot butterfly and threatened status for the streaked horned lark; final rule. FWS-R1-Es-2012-0080, Washington D.C.
55. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). (2013b). Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 6-month extension of final determination for the proposed listing and designation of critical habitat for four subspecies of Mazama pocket gopher. FWS-R1-Es-2012-0088; FWS-R1-Es-2013-0021, Washington, D.C.
56. Villa F., Bagstad K.J., Voigt B., Johnson G.W., Portela R., Honzak M., Batker D. A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLOS One 2014, 9:e91001.
57. Warren S.D., Holbrook S.W., Dale D.A., Whelan N.L., Elyn M., Grimm W., Jentsch A. Biodiversity and the heterogeneous disturbance regime on military training lands. Restor. Ecol. 2007, 15:606-612.
58. Washington Academy of Sciences Opportunities for addressing laminated root rot caused by Phellinus sulphuracens in Washington's forests 2013, Washington State Academy of Sciences and Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.
59. Wheeler C.T., Helgerson O.T., Perry D.A., Gordon J.C. Nitrogen fixation and biomass accumulation in plant communities dominated by Cytisus scoparius L. in Oregon and Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 1987, 24:231-237.
60. Whitecotton R.C., David M.B., Darmody R.G., Price D.L. Impact of foot traffic from military training on soil and vegetation properties. Environ. Manag. 2000, 26:697-706.
61. WSDoR (Washington State Department of Revenue) Stumpage value Determination Tables (1973-2012) 2012, WSDoR, Olympia, WA.
62. Zheng H., Robinson B.E., Liang Y., Polasky S., Ma D.C., Wang F.C., Ruckelshaus R., Ouyang Z.Y., Daily G.C. Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:16681-16686.