Social work education for interdisciplinary practice with older adults and their families

Journal of Gerontological Social Work

Volumn 39, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 37-55

  Damronrodriguez, Joann ^a   Corley, Constance Saltz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geronotology; Interdisciplinary practice; Social work education; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962547638     PISSN: 01634372     EISSN: 15404048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J083v39n01_05     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Berkman, B., Dobrof, R., Harry, L., and Damron-Rodriguez, J. A., 1997. “White paper:Social work”. In A national agenda for geriatric education:White papers., Edited by:Klein, S. M., 53–85. New York:Springer Publishing Company.
2. Bernard, M., Connelly, R., Kuder, L., Mellor, J., Norman, L., and Tsukuda, R. A., 1997. “White Paper:Interdisciplinary education”. In A national agenda for geriatric education:White papers., Edited by:Klein, S. M., New York, NY:Springer Publishing Company.
3. Brunner, B. K., 1995. The use of work teams:A help or hindrance to performance?. Topics in Health Information Management, 16:32–40.
4. Campbell, L., 1992a. “Team leadership”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings Gleview, IL:Editor.
5. Campbell, L. J., 1992b. “Team maintenance and enhancement”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings. Glenview, IL:Editor.
6. Chronicle Guidance Publications. 1999. Geriatric Social Workers, Brief 534, Moravia, NY:Chronicle Guidance Publications, Inc.
7. Clark, P. G., 1997. Values in health care professional socialization:Implications for geriatric education in interdisciplinary team work. The Gerontologist, 37(4):441–451.
8. Clark, P. G., and Drinka, T. J. K., eds. 1994. “Conceptual foundations for interdisciplinary education in gerontology and geriatrics”. In Educational Gerontology Vol. 20, (1).
9. Corley, C. S., “Health, spirituality, and healing”. In Religious organizations in community services., Edited by:Tirrito, T., and Cascio, T., New York:Springer. (in press)
10. Corley, C. S., The spirit of teamwork and the evolution of interdisciplinary education and practice. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America. November2001, Chicago, IL.
11. Damron-Rodriguez, J. A., Frank, J., Heck, E., Liu, D., Sragow, S., Cruise, P., and Osterweil, D., 1998. Physician knowledge of community-based care:What's the score?. Annals of Long-Term Care, 6(4):112–121.
12. Damron-Rodriguez, J. A., and Lubben, J. E., 1997. The 1995 WHCoA:An agenda for social work education and training. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 27(3):65–77.
13. Damron-Rodriguez, J. A., Villa, V., Tseng, H. F., and Lubben, J. E., 1997. Demographic and organizational influences on the development of gerontological social work curriculum. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 17(3):3–18.
14. Drinka, T. J. K., 1994. Interdisciplinary geriatric teams:Approaches to conflict as indicator of potential to model teamwork. Educational Gerontology, 20:87–103.
15. Frank, J., and DellaPenna, R., 1998. “Geriatric team training in managed care organizations”. In Geriatric interdisciplinary team training., Edited by:Siegler, E. L., Hyer, K., Fulmer, T., and Mezey, M., 149–163. New York, NY:Springer.
16. Frank, J., DellaPenna, R., Alfarich, T., Damron-Rodriguez, J., Waite, M., Meltzer, P., and Cardagan, M., 1998. Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team Managed Care Training of Trainers Program, University of California and Kaiser Permanente.
17. Frank, R. G., and Elliott, T. R., 1992. “Conflict resolution and feedback”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings Glenview, IL:Editor.
18. Garner, H. G., 1992a. “Information sharing and communication”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings Glenview, IL:Editor.
19. Garner, H. G., 1992b. “Team problem solving and decision making”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings Glenview, IL:Editor.
20. Gibelman, M., and Schervish, P. H., 1997. Who we are:A second look., Washington, D.C.:NASW Press.
21. Jette, A., 1996. “Disability trends and transitions”. In Handbook of aging and social sciences., Edited by:Binstock, R., and George, L., 94–117. San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
22. Johnson, P. W., and Johnson, F. P., 1991. Joining together:Group theory and group skills., Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
23. Katzenbach, J. R., and Smith, D. K., 1993. The wisdom of teams., New York:Harper Collins.
24. Lubben, J., Damron-Rodriguez, J., and Beck, J., 1992. A national survey of aging curriculum in schools of social work. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 18(3/4):157–171.
25. McClane, W. E., 1992a. “The context for teamwork”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings Glenview, IL:Editor.
26. McClane, W. E., 1992b. “Evaluation and accountability”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings. Glenview, IL:Editor.
27. Mellor, M. J., and Lindeman, D., 1998. The role of the social worker in interdisciplinary geriatrics teams. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 30(3/4):3
28. National Academy on an Aging Society. 2000. Caregiving:Helping the elderly with activity limitations, 1–6. Washington, D. C.:National Academy on an Aging Society. No. 7
29. National Center for Health Statistics. 1990. Current estimates from the National Health Interviews Survey:U. S. 1989, Vital and Health Statistics 197 Series 10
30. Ouslander, D., Brummel-Smith, K., and Beck, J., 2000. Comprehensive geriatric assessment., New York:McGraw Hill.
31. Pew Health Professions Commission & California Primary Care Consortium. 1995. Interdisciplinary collaborative teams in primary care:A model curriculum and resource guide., San Francisco, CA:Pew Health Professions Commission.
32. Pew Health Professions Commission. 1995. Health professions education and managed care:Challenges and necessary responses., San Francisco, CA:UCSF Center for the Health Professions.
33. Rothberg, J. S., 1992. “Knowledge of disciplines, roles, and functions of team members”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (editor), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings. Glenview, IL:Editor.
34. Rubenstein, L. Z., Stuck, A. E., Soi, A. L., and Weiland, D., 1991. Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes:Overview of the evidence. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Supplement), 30:85–165.
35. Saltz, C. C., and Schaeffer, T., 1996. Interdisciplinary teams in health care:Integration of family caregivers. Social Work in Health Care, 22(3):59–70.
36. Saltz, C. C., 1992a. “A guide to the Guide”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings. Glenview, IL:Editor.
37. Saltz, C. C., 1992b. “Stages and structure in team development”. In American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ed.), Guide to interdisciplinary practice in rehabilitation settings Glenview, IL:Editor.
38. Saltz, C. C., 1996. Promoting skills in evaluating interdisciplinary geriatric teams. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 16(4):70–90.
39. Saltz, C. C., and Damron-Rodriguez, J. C., 1998. Interdisciplinary education:A social work sourcebook., Alexandria, VA:Council on Social Work Education.
40. Scharlach, A., Damron-Rodriguez, J., Roberson, B., and Feldman, R., 2000. Educating social workers for an aging society:A vision for the 21st century. Journal of Social Work Education, 36:521–538.
41. Scholtes, P. R., 1988. The team handbook:How to use teams to improve quality., Madison, WI:Joiner, Assoc.
42. Sundstrom, E., deMeuse, K. P., and Futrell, D., 1990. Work teams:Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45:120–133.
43. Thyer, B., and Kropf, N., eds. 1995. Developmental disabilities:A handbook for interdisciplinary practice., Cambridge, MA:Brookline Books.
44. Tuckman, B. W., 1965. Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63:384–399.
45. U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1996. Current populations reports, Special Studies, 23–190. Washington, D.C.:U. S. Government Printing Office. 65+ in the United States
46. U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1992. Census of population., Washington, D. C:U. S. Government Printing Office.
47. U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1992. Current Population Survey, Annual Average Data., Washington, D. C:U. S. Government Printing Office.
48. 1995. U. S. News & World Report. Twenty hot job tracks:The best 1996 career guide. U. S. News & World Report, 119(7) October 30:98
49. Waite, M. S., Harker, J. O., and Messerman, L. I., 1994. Interdisciplinary team training and diversity:Problems, concepts and strategies. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 15(1):65–82.
50. Waite, M. S., and Hoffman, S. B., 2001. “Team Productivity”. In Team Performance in health care:Assessment and development., Edited by:Heinemann, G. D., and Zeiss, A. M., Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
51. Weiland, D., Kramer, B. J., Waite, M. S., and Rubenstein, L. Z., 1996. The interdisciplinary team in geriatric care. American Behavioral Specialist, 39:655–664.
52. Zeiss, A., and Steffon, A., 1996. “Interdisciplinary health care teams:The basic unit of geriatric care”. In The practical handbook of clinical gerontology., Edited by:Cartensen, L., Edelstein, B., and Dombrand, L., Newbury Park, CA:Sage.