Discontent and confusion: Primary care providers' opinions and understanding of current cervical cancer screening recommendations

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 255-262

  Boone, Emily ^a   Lewis, LaVonna ^a   Karp, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GYNECOLOGIST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NURSE PRACTITIONER; OBSTETRICIAN; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFUSION; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSTETRICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; RANDOMIZATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CONFUSION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; OBSTETRICS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84962545348     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5326     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gustafasson L, Ponten J, Zack M, Adami HO. International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening. Cancer Causes Control 1997; 8: 755-763
2. Nieminen P, Kallio M, Hakama M. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 1017-1021
3. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 342-362
4. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin No. 109. Cervical Cancer Screening. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1409-1420
5. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: Recommendations and rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003
6. Saraiya M, King J, Thompson T, et al. Cervical cancer screening among women aged 18-30 years-United States, 2000-2010. JAMA 2013; 309: 868-870
7. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin number 131: Screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1222-1238
8. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 147-172
9. Moyer VA. U.S. preventive services task force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 880-891
10. Teoh DGK, Marriott AE, Isaksson Vogel R, et al. Adherence to the 2012 national cervical cancer screening guidelines: a pilot study. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 62.e1-62.e9
11. Integrated Healthcare Association. Value based pay for performance: Results for measurement year 2013. Presentation at the California Integrated Healthcare Association Stakeholders meeting; September 24, 2014, Los Angeles, California. Available at: www.iha.org/pdfs-documents/p4p-California/VBP4P-Results-Presentation-20141010.pdf (Accessed October 27, 2015
12. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010 census of population and housing, summary population and housing characteristics, CPH-1-6, California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2012
13. Howell L, Dodson M, Adelman M, Pena K, Mize B, Soisson A. 2012 cervical cancer screening guidelines: Are we following the new recommendations and have we improved over time? Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135: 387