Validation of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale definition of response for adults with major depressive disorder using equipercentile linking to Clinical Global Impression scale ratings: Analysis of Pharmacogenomic Research Network Antidepressant Medication Pharmacogenomic Study (PGRN-AMPS) data

Human Psychopharmacology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 185-192

  Bobo, William V ^a   Angleró, Gabriela C ^a,b   Jenkins, Gregory ^a   Hall Flavin, Daniel K ^a   Weinshilboum, Richard ^c   Biernacka, Joanna M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Puerto Rico)

^c MAYO GRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

citalopram; equipercentile linking; escitalopram; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; major depressive disorder; response

Indexed keywords

CITALOPRAM; ESCITALOPRAM; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL GLOBAL IMPRESSION SCALE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG DOSE INCREASE; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN STUDY; PHARMACOGENOMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT REFUSAL; VALIDATION STUDY; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHARMACOGENETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CITALOPRAM; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHARMACOGENETICS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84962489702     PISSN: 08856222     EISSN: 10991077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2526     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, Marshall MB,. 2004. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight? Am J Psychiatry 161 (12): 2163-2177.
2. Bech P,. 1981. Rating scales for affective disorders: their validity and consistency. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 295: 1-101.
3. Bech P,. 2006. Rating scales in depression: limitations and pitfalls. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 8 (2): 207-215.
4. Busner J, Targum SD,. 2007. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 4 (7): 28-37.
5. Cusin C, Yang H, Yeung A, Fava M,. 2009. Rating scales for depression. In Handbook of Clinical Rating Scales and Assessment in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Baer L, Blais MA, (eds). Humana Press: New York; 7-36.
6. Faries D, Herrera J, Rayamajhi J, DeBrota D, Demitrack M, Potter WZ,. 2000. The responsiveness of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. J Psychiatr Res 34 (1): 3-10.
7. Furukawa TA, Akechi T, Azuma H, Okuyama T, Higuchi T,. 2007. Evidence-based guidelines for interpretation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 27 (5): 531-534.
8. Guy W,. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-revised (DHEW Publ. No. ADM 76-338). Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, 1976.
9. Hamilton M,. 1960. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23: 56-62.
10. Kennedy SH,. 2008. Core symptoms of major depressive disorder: relevance to diagnosis and treatment. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 10 (3): 271-277.
11. Kolen MJ, Brennan RL,. 2014. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking-Methods and Practices. Springer: New York.
12. Kriston L, von Wolff WA,. 2011. Not as golden as standards should be: interpretation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. J Affect Disord 128 (1-2): 175-177.
13. Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel R,. 2005a. Clinical implications of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores. Br J Psychiatry 187: 366-371.
14. Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel RR,. 2005b. What does the PANSS mean? Schizophr Res 79 (2-3): 231-238.
15. Leucht S, Kane JM, Etschel E, Kissling W, Hamann J, Engel RR,. 2006. Linking the PANSS, BPRS, and CGI: clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (10): 2318-2325.
16. Leucht S, Fennema H, Engel R, Kaspers-Janssen M, Lepping P, Szegedi A,. 2013. What does the HAMD mean? J Affect Disord 148 (2-3): 243-248.
17. Licht RW, Qvitzau S, Allerup P, Bech P,. 2005. Validation of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale in patients with major depression; is the total score a valid measure of illness severity? Acta Psychiatr Scand 111 (2): 144-149.
18. Masson SC, Tejani AM,. 2013. Minimum clinically important differences identified for commonly used depression rating scales. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (7): 805-807.
19. McIntyre R, Kennedy S, Bagby RM, Bakish D,. 2002. Assessing full remission. J Psychiatry Neurosci 27 (4): 235-239.
20. Mrazek DA, Biernacka JM, McAlpine DE, et al., 2014. Treatment outcomes of depression: the Pharmacogenomic Research Network Antidepressant Medication Pharmacogenomic Study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 34 (3): 313-317.
21. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, et al., 2003. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 54 (5): 573-583.
22. Rush AJ, Kraemer HC, Sackeim HA, et al., 2006. Report by the ACNP Task Force on response and remission in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 31 (9): 1841-1853.
23. Spielmans GI, McFall JP,. 2006. A comparative meta-analysis of Clinical Global Impressions change in antidepressant trials. J Nerv Ment Dis 194 (11): 845-852.
24. Tomba E, Bech P,. 2012. Clinimetrics and clinical psychometrics: macro- and micro-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 81 (6): 333-343.
25. Williams JB,. 2001. Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 251 (Suppl 2): II6-II12.