Anomalous capillary filling and wettability reversal in nanochannels

Physical Review E

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Gravelle, Simon ^a   Ybert, Christophe ^a   Bocquet, Lydéric ^b   Joly, Laurent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DIGITAL STORAGE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; WETTING; YARN;

COMPLEMENTARY DATA; DISJOINING PRESSURES; FILLING VELOCITIES; MECHANICAL ENERGY STORAGES; MEMBRANE SELECTIVITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; NANO-POROUS MEDIA; WETTABILITY REVERSAL;

FILLING;

EID: 84962436326     PISSN: 24700045     EISSN: 24700053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.033123     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. P.-G. De Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Quéré, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013).
2. B. Zhmud, F. Tiberg, and K. Hallstensson, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 228, 263 (2000). JCISA5 0021-9797 10.1006/jcis.2000.6951
3. P. Huber, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 103102 (2015). JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/27/10/103102
4. R. Lucas, Kolloid-Z. 23, 15 (1918). CPMSB6 0303-402X 10.1007/BF01461107
5. E. W. Washburn, Phys. Rev. 17, 273 (1921). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.17.273
6. C. Bosanquet, Philos. Mag. Ser. 6 45, 525 (1923). 1941-5982 10.1080/14786442308634144
7. S. Supple and N. Quirke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 214501 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.214501
8. D. I. Dimitrov, A. Milchev, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 054501 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.054501
9. F. Caupin, M. W. Cole, S. Balibar, and J. Treiner, Europhysics Lett. 82, 56004 (2008). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/82/56004
10. D. Schebarchov and S. C. Hendy, Phys. Rev. E 78, 046309 (2008). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046309
11. S. Gruener, T. Hofmann, D. Wallacher, A. V. Kityk, and P. Huber, Phys. Rev. E 79, 067301 (2009). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.067301
12. E. Oyarzua, J. H. Walther, A. Mejía, and H. A. Zambrano, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 14731 (2015). PPCPFQ 1463-9076 10.1039/C5CP01862E
13. T. Q. Vo, M. Barisik, and B. H. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 92, 053009 (2015). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.053009
14. O. Vincent, A. Szenicer, and A. D. Stroock, arXiv:1510.00411.
15. L. Bocquet and P. Tabeling, Lab Chip 14, 3143 (2014). 1473-0197 10.1039/C4LC00325J
16. R. Schoch, J. Han, and P. Renaud, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 839 (2008). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.839
17. W. Sparreboom, A. van den Berg, and J. C. T. Eijkel, Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 713 (2009). 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2009.332
18. L. Bocquet and E. Charlaix, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1073 (2010). 0306-0012 10.1039/B909366B
19. K. Falk, B. Coasne, R. Pellenq, F.-J. Ulm, and L. Bocquet, Nat. Commun. 6, 6949 (2015). 2041-1723 10.1038/ncomms7949
20. L. Bocquet and J.-L. Barrat, Soft Matter 3, 685 (2007). 1744-683X 10.1039/b616490k
21. R. C. Tolman, J. Chem. Phys. 17, 333 (1949). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1747247
22. C. Bauer and S. Dietrich, Eur. Phys. J. B 10, 767 (1999). EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s100510050907
23. J. H. Snoeijer and B. Andreotti, Phys. Fluids 20, 057101 (2008). PHFLE6 1070-6631 10.1063/1.2913675
24. J. W. van Honschoten, N. Brunets, and N. R. Tas, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1096 (2010). 0306-0012 10.1039/b909101g
25. T. Hofmann, M. Tasinkevych, A. Checco, E. Dobisz, S. Dietrich, and B. M. Ocko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 106102 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.106102
26. L. Guillemot, T. Biben, A. Galarneau, G. Vigier, and E. Charlaix, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19557 (2012). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.1207658109
27. S. Lichter, A. Martini, R. Q. Snurr, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 226001 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.226001
28. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Molec. Graphics 14, 33 (1996). JMGRDV 0263-7855 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
29. S. K. Kannam, B. D. Todd, J. S. Hansen, and P. J. Daivis, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 094701 (2013). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.4793396
30. T. B. Sisan and S. Lichter, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 11, 787 (2011). 1613-4982 10.1007/s10404-011-0855-9
31. L. Joly, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 214705 (2011). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.3664622
32. R. A. Sampson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 182, 449 (1891). PTRMAD 1364-503X 10.1098/rsta.1891.0012
33. S. Gravelle, L. Joly, F. Detcheverry, C. Ybert, C. Cottin-Bizonne, and L. Bocquet, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16367 (2013). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.1306447110
34. S. Gravelle, L. Joly, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 18C526 (2014). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.4897253
35. Note, however, that structuring effects can be accounted for in continuum descriptions, e.g., in the density functional theory framework [22,25].
36. S. Plimpton, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995). JCTPAH 0021-9991 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
37. J. L. Abascal and C. Vega, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 234505 (2005). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.2121687
38. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5179 (1995). JACSAT 0002-7863 10.1021/ja00124a002
39. Simulations with flexible and fixed walls were shown to give similar results for the statics and friction of confined liquids in previous work [56-58].
40. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.448118
41. K. H. Jensen, A. X. C. N. Valente, and H. A. Stone, Phys. Fluids 26, 052004 (2014). PHFLE6 1070-6631 10.1063/1.4876937
42. N. Giovambattista, A. B. Almeida, A. M. Alencar, and S. V. Buldyrev, J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 1597 (2016). 1932-7447 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10377
43. T. Getta and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. E 57, 655 (1998). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.655
44. Line tension should play no role in the cylindrical and slit geometries we considered, because a change in the contact angle does not modify the length of the contact line.
45. In practice, no spontaneous filling is observed and the initial condition is modified by preparing the tube in the already filled configuration. From there, the measured evolution corresponds to a capillary emptying with the water being ejected from the nanotube.
46. For hydrophobic tubes, water is forced to enter the channel by applying a pressure to the piston, until the tube is half-filled.
47. C. Song and B. Corry, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 7642 (2009). JPCBFK 1520-6106 10.1021/jp810102u
48. B. Corry, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 1427 (2008). JPCBFK 1520-6106 10.1021/jp709845u
49. T. A. Pascal, W. A. Goddard, and Y. Jung, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11794 (2011). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.1108073108
50. M. S. Daw and M. I. Baskes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1285
51. G. Grochola, S. P. Russo, and I. K. Snook, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 204719 (2005). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.2124667
52. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed., edited by Elsevier (Academic, New York, 2011).
53. G. Tocci, L. Joly, and A. Michaelides, Nano Lett. 14, 6872 (2014). NALEFD 1530-6984 10.1021/nl502837d
54. X. Qin, Q. Yuan, Y. Zhao, S. Xie, and Z. Liu, Nano Lett. 11, 2173 (2011). NALEFD 1530-6984 10.1021/nl200843g
55. E. Gouaux and R. Mackinnon, Science (New York, NY) 310, 1461 (2005). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1113666
56. A. Alexiadis and S. Kassinos, Chem. Rev. 108, 5014 (2008). CHREAY 0009-2665 10.1021/cr078140f
57. J. A. Thomas and A. J. H. McGaughey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 184502 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.184502
58. T. Werder, J. H. Walther, R. L. Jaffe, T. Halicioglu, and P. Koumoutsakos, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 1345 (2003). JPCBFK 1520-6106 10.1021/jp0268112