Building the partners healthcare biobank at partners personalized medicine: Informed consent, return of research results, recruitment lessons and operational considerations

Journal of Personalized Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-11

  Karlson, Elizabeth W ^a   Boutin, Natalie T ^b   Hoffnagle, Alison G ^c   Allen, Nicole L ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobank; Biorepository; Electronic informed consent; Partners biobank; Partners healthcare biobank; Personalized medicine; Precision medicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOBANK; DEMOGRAPHY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE;

EID: 84962213011     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20754426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/jpm6010002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wolf, S. M.; Lawrenz, F. P.; Nelson, C. A.; Kahn, J. P.; Cho, M. K.; Clayton, E. W.; Fletcher, J. G.; Georgieff, M. K.; Hammerschmidt, D.; Hudson, K.; et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations. J. Law Med. Ethics 2008, 36, 219-248. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
2. Wolf, S. M.; Crock, B. N.; Van Ness, B.; Lawrenz, F.; Kahn, J. P.; Beskow, L. M.; Cho, M. K.; Christman, M. F.; Green, R. C.; Hall, R.; et al. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet. Med. 2012, 14, 361-384. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
3. Allen, N. L.; Karlson, E. W.; Malspeis, S.; Lu, B.; Seidman, C. E.; Lehmann, L. S. Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: Perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2014, 89, 738-746. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
4. Fabsitz, R. R.; McGuire, A.; Sharp, R. R.; Puggal, M.; Beskow, L. M.; Biesecker, L. G.; Bookman, E.; Burke, W.; Burchard, E. G.; Church, G.; et al. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group. Circulation 2010, 3, 574-580. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
5. Krawczak, M.; Nikolaus, S.; von Eberstein, H.; Croucher, P. J.; El Mokhtari, N. E.; Schreiber, S. PopGen: Population-based recruitment of patients and controls for the analysis of complex genotype-phenotype relationships. Public Health Genomics 2006, 9, 55-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
6. Olson, J. E.; Ryu, E.; Johnson, K. J.; Koenig, B. A.; Maschke, K. J.; Morrisette, J. A.; Liebow, M.; Takahashi, P. Y.; Fredericksen, Z. S.; Sharma, R. G.; et al. The Mayo Clinic Biobank: A building block for individualized medicine. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 952-962. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
7. McCarty, C. A.; Wilke, R. A.; Giampietro, P. F.; Wesbrook, S. D.; Caldwell, M. D. Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project (PMRP): Design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank. Pers. Med. 2005, 2, 49-79. [CrossRef].
8. Sanner, J. E.; Frazier, L. Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2007, 39, 25-29. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
9. Brody, B. A.; McCullough, L. B.; Sharp, R. R. Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. JAMA 2005, 294, 1411-1414. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
10. Goldenberg, A. J.; Hull, S. C.; Botkin, J. R.; Wilfond, B. S. Pediatric biobanks: Approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J. Pediatr. 2009, 155, 578-583. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
11. Streicher, S. A.; Sanderson, S. C.; Jabs, E. W.; Diefenbach, M.; Smirnoff, M.; Peter, I.; Horowitz, C. R.; Brenner, B.; Richardson, L. D. Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: A focus group study. J. Community Genet. 2011, 2, 153-163. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
12. Lemke, A. A.; Wolf, W. A.; Hebert-Beirne, J.; Smith, M. E. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010, 13, 368-377. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
13. Beskow, L. M.; Dombeck, C. B.; Thompson, C. P.; Watson-Ormond, J. K.; Weinfurt, K. P. Informed consent for biobanking: Consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension. Genet. Med. 2014, 17, 226-233. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
14. McCue, T. J. Online Learning Industry Poised for $107 Billion in 2015. Available online: http://www. forbes. com/sites/tjmccue/2014/08/27/online-learning-industry-poised-for-107-billion-in-2015/(accessed on 21 October 2015).
15. Simon, C. M.; Klein, D. W.; Schartz, H. A. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: A randomized trial. Genet. Med. 2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
16. Kaye, J.; Whitley, E. A.; Lund, D.; Morrison, M.; Teare, H.; Melham, K. Dynamic consent: A patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 23, 141-146. [CrossRef] [PubMed].
17. Electronic Informed Consent (eIC). Available online: www. partners. org/biobank (accessed on 21 October 2015).