Flexible data integration and curation using a graph-based approach

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 918-925

  Croset, Samuel ^a   Rupp, Joachim ^a   Romacker, Martin ^a  

^a F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE LTD   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASE;

DATA CURATION; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE BASES;

EID: 84962205036     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv644     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Batchelor,C. et al. (2014) Scientific lenses to support multiple views over linked chemistry data. In: The Semantic Web-ISWC 2014. Springer. pp. 98-113.
2. Berners-Lee,T. et al. (2001) The semantic web. Scientific American, 284, 28-37.
3. Bollacker,K. et al. (2008) Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. ACM, pp. 1247-1250.
4. Brandes,U. (2001) A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25, 163-177.
5. Dong,X. et al. (2014) Knowledge vault: A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp. 601-610.
6. Dutot,A. et al. (2007) Graphstream: A tool for bridging the gap between complex systems and dynamic graphs. In Emergent Properties in Natural and Artificial Complex Systems. Satellite Conference within the 4th European Conference on Complex Systems (ECCS'2007).
7. Fellegi,I.P. et al. (1969) A theory for record linkage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 64, 1183-1210.
8. Hernandez,M.A. et al. (1998) Real-world data is dirty: Data cleansing and the merge/purge problem. Data Mining Knowled. Discov., 2, 9-37.
9. Juty,N.et al. (2012) Identifiers. org and miriam registry: community resources to provide persistent identification. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D580-D586.
10. Kidd,J. (2006) Life after statin patent expiries. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 5, 813-814.
11. Lipinski,C.A. et al. (2014) Parallel worlds of public and commercial bioactive chemistry data. J. Med. Chem.
12. Marx,V. (2013) Biology: The big challenges of big data. Nature, 498, 255-260.
13. Pence,H.E. and Williams,A. (2010) Chemspider: an online chemical information resource. J. Chem. Educ., 87, 1123-1124.
14. Roos,L. and Wajda,A. (1991) Record linkage strategies. part i: Estimating information and evaluating approaches. Methods Inform. Med., 30, 117-123.
15. Singhal,A. (2012) Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings. Official Google Blog.
16. Szalma,S. et al. (2010) Effective knowledge management in translational medicine. J. Trans. Med., 8, 68.
17. Tiikkainen,P. et al. (2013) Estimating error rates in bioactivity databases. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 53, 2499-2505.
18. Wajda,A. et al. (1991) Record linkage strategies: Part ii. portable software and deterministic matching. Methods Inform. Med., 30, 210-214.
19. Wikipedia (2014a) Complete graph.
20. Wikipedia (2014b) List of largest selling pharmaceutical products.
21. Williams,A.J. et al. (2012a) Open phacts: semantic interoperability for drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today, 17, 1188-1198.
22. Williams,A.J. et al. (2012b) Towards a gold standard: regarding quality in public domain chemistry databases and approaches to improving the situation. Drug Discov. Today, 17, 685-701.
23. Wilson,D.R. (2011) Beyond probabilistic record linkage: Using neural networks and complex features to improve genealogical record linkage. In Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2011 International Joint Conference on, pages 9-14. IEEE.
24. Winkler,W.E. (1995) Matching and record linkage. Business Survey Methods, 1, 355-384.
25. Winkler,W.E. (2014) Matching and record linkage. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 6, 313-325.