Travel Burden to Breast MRI and Utilization: Are Risk and Sociodemographics Related?

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 611-619

  Onega, Tracy ^a,b   Lee, Christoph I ^c,d,e   Benkeser, David ^d,f   Alford Teaster, Jennifer ^a   Haas, Jennifer S ^g   Tosteson, Anna N A ^a,b   Hill, Deirdre ^h   Shi, Xun ⁱ   Henderson, Louise M ^j   Hubbard, Rebecca A ^k  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e USA   (United States)

^f GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Breast imaging; Geographic Information Systems; GIS; MRI; proximity to care; travel time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLACK PERSON; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CAUCASIAN; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RACE DIFFERENCE; RURAL AREA; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL STATUS; TRAVEL; URBAN AREA; URBAN POPULATION; URBAN RURAL DIFFERENCE; VERY ELDERLY; VULNERABLE POPULATION; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; RISK FACTOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; TIME FACTOR; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TRAVEL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84962144705     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: 1558349X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 1 Celaya, M.O., Berke, E.M., Onega, T.L., et al. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire 1998-2004). Rural Remote Health, 10, 2010, 1361.
2. 2 Onega, T., Hubbard, R., Hill, D., et al. Geographic access to breast imaging for US women. J Am Coll Radiol 11 (2014), 874–882.
3. 3 Onega, T., Cook, A., Kirlin, B., et al. The influence of travel time on breast cancer characteristics, receipt of primary therapy, and surveillance mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129 (2011), 269–275.
4. 4 Wernli, K.J., DeMartini, W.B., Ichikawa, L., et al. Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med 174 (2014), 125–132.
5. 5 Saslow, D., Boetes, C., Burke, W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57 (2007), 75–89.
6. 6 Graubard, B.I., Freedman, A.N., Gail, M.H., Five-year and lifetime risk of breast cancer among U.S. subpopulations: implications for magnetic resonance imaging screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19 (2010), 2430–2436.
7. 7 Boscoe, F.P., Johnson, C.J., Henry, K.A., et al. Geographic proximity to treatment for early stage breast cancer and likelihood of mastectomy. Breast 20 (2011), 324–328.
8. 8 Berke, E.M., Shi, X., Computing travel time when the exact address is unknown: a comparison of point and polygon ZIP code approximation methods. Int J Health Geogr, 8, 2009, 23.
9. 9 Elkin, E.B., Ishill, N.M., Snow, J.G., et al. Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Med Care 48 (2010), 349–356.
10. 10 Onega, T., Duell, E.J., Shi, X., Wang, D., Demidenko, E., Goodman, D., Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S. Cancer 112 (2008), 909–918.
11. 11 Peipins, L.A., Graham, S., Young, R., et al. Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. J Commun Health 36 (2011), 675–683.
12. 12 Peipins, L.A., Miller, J., Richards, T.B., et al. Characteristics of US counties with no mammography capacity. J Commun Health 37 (2012), 1239–1248.
13. 13 Mobley, L.R., Kuo, T.M., Clayton, L.J., Evans, W.D., Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?. Cancer Causes Control 20 (2009), 1017–1028.
14. 14 National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Available at: http://breastscreening.cancer.gov. Accessed November 3, 2014.
15. 15 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium risk calculator. Available at: https://tools.bcsc-scc.org/BC5yearRisk/intro.htm. Accessed July 24, 2015.
16. 16 Washington State Department of Health. Guidelines for using rural-urban classification systems for public health assessment. Available at: http://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/5500/RuralUrbGuide.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2015.
17. 17 WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. RUCA data. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-data.php. Accessed July 24, 2015.
18. 18 National Cancer Institute. BCSC glossary of terms. Available at: http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/bcsc_data_definitions.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2015.
19. 19 Environmental System Research Institute. Definition: origin-destination cost matrix. Available at: http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/GISDictionary/term/origin-destination%20cost%20matrix. Accessed July 24, 2015.
20. 20 TomTom North America I. US and Canada Detailed Streets (version 2012-03-01). 2007, Environmental System Research Institute, Redlands, California.
21. 21 American Cancer Society. Breast cancer: mammography statistics. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/research/infographicgallery/mammography-statistics. Accessed July 24, 2015.
22. 22 Ballard-Barbash, R., Taplin, S.H., Yankaskas, B.C., et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 (1997), 1001–1008.
23. 23 Onitilo, A.A., Liang, H., Stankowski, R.V., et al. Geographical and seasonal barriers to mammography services and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Rural Remote Health, 14, 2014, 2738.
24. 24 Huang, B., Dignan, M., Han, D., Johnson, O., Does distance matter? Distance to mammography facilities and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Kentucky. J Rural Health 25 (2009), 366–371.
25. 25 Kempe, K.L., Larson, R.S., Shetterley, S., Wilkinson, A., Breast cancer screening in an insured population: whom are we missing?. Permanente J 17 (2013), 38–44.
26. 26 Henry, K.A., Boscoe, F.P., Johnson, C.J., Goldberg, D.W., Sherman, R., Cockburn, M., Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: is travel time important?. J Commun Health 36 (2011), 933–942.