Considerations in choosing a deaeration technique for dissolution media

Dissolution Technologies

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 16-17

  Griffith, M F ^a   Curley, T E ^a   Martin, G P ^a  

^a MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; DISSOLUTION; MANPOWER;

EID: 84962118954     PISSN: 1521298X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14227/DT040197P16     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Hansoll, WA., Handbook of Dissolution Testing, 2nd Edition, Revised, Aster- Publishing Corporation. Eugene, Oregon, 1991.
2. Gray, V.A., Hubert, B.B., Calibration of Dissolution Apparatuses I and 2 what To Do When Your Equipment Fai1s. Pharm. 20:6 (1994) 8571-8573.
3. Qureshi, S.A., MCGilveray, I.J., Impact of Different Deaeration Methods on the USP Dissolution Apparatus Suitability Test Criteria. Pharm. Forum 20:6 (1994) 8565-8566.
4. Rohrn, B.R., Stelzer, D.J., Deaeration Techniques For Dissolution Media. Dissolution Technologies, 2:2, (1995),7-8.
5. Moore, T.W., Shangraw, R.F., Habib, Y., Dissolution Calibrator Tablets: A Recommendation for New Calibrator Tablets A Recommendation for New Calibrator Tablets. Pharm Forum, 22:3 (1996) 2423-2428.
6. Moore, T. W., Hamilton, J.F., Kerner, C.M., Dissolution Testing: Limitations of the USP Prednisone and Salicylic Acid Calibrator Tablets. Pharm Forum, 21:5 (1995) 1387-1398.
7. Dissofill Automated Medill Preparation DeVice, Erweka Instruments, Inc. Milford, CT.