Engagement in innovation management: Perceptions and interests in the GM debate1

Creativity and Innovation Management

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 211-220

  Weisenfeld, Ursula ^a  

^a LEUPHANA UNIVERSITY OF LÜNEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961898656     PISSN: 09631690     EISSN: 14678691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-1690.2003.00284.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. th Edition, Fort Worth et al.
2. BBC (1999) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/465222.stm), 5.10.1999.
3. Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: Toward a new modernity. Sage, London.
4. Convey, J. (1999) Rockefeller Foundation, http://www.rockfound.org, 13.10.99.
5. Covey, J. and Brown, L.D. (2001) Critical Cooperation: An Alternative Form of Civil Society-Business Engagement, IDR Report, 17(1).
6. Faber, E.C.C. (2001) Managing Collaborative New Product Development. Twente University Press, Enschede.
7. Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Faber, Stanford CA.
8. Freeman, R. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Ballinger, Boston.
9. Greenpeace (1999) http://archive.greenpeace.org/majordomo/index-press-releases/1999/msg00259.html
10. Gristock, J. (2000) Systems of Innovation are Systems of Mediation: A discussion of the critical role of science communication in innovation and knowledge-based development, Working Paper, SPRU Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, August.
11. Herring, R.J. (2002) Promothean Science, Pandora's Jug: Conflicts Around Genetically Engineered Organisms in India, The 2001 Mary Keatinge Das Lecture, Columbia University.
12. Huttner, S.L. (1995) Government, Researchers, and Activists: The Critical Public Policy Interface. In Brauer, E. (ed.), Biotechnology, Vol. 12, Legal, Economic & Ethical Dimension, 2nd Edn, VCH, Weinheim.
13. Janis, I.L. (1982) Groupthink. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.
14. Massey, J.E. (2001) Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis, Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 153–82.
15. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–86.
16. Osgood, D. (2001) Dig It Up: Global Civil Society's Responses to Plant Biotechnology. In Global Civil Society Yearbook 2001. London School of Economics London Chapter 4, 79–107.
17. Potrykus, I. (2000) The ‘Golden Rice’ Tale, posted at: AgBioView, October 23, 2000, http://www.biotech-info.net/GR_tale.html
18. Rip, A. (2002) Co-Evolution of Science, Technology and Society. An Expert Review for the Bundesministerium Bildung und Forschung's Förderinitiative Politik, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft (Science Policy Studies), as managed by the Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
19. Rosenbaum, W. (1999) The Good Lesson of Bad Experience. Rethinking the Future of Commercial Nuclear Power, American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 74–92.
20. Schiffman, L.G. and Kanuk, L.L. (1997) Consumer Behavior, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
21. Schumpeter, J. (1912) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker Humblot, Leipzig.
22. Shiva, V. (1999) The Plunder of Nature, Synthesis/Regeneration 19 (Spring 1999), http://www.greens.org/s-r/19/19-02.html
23. Shiva, V. (2000) GE Vitamin ‘A’ rice: A blind approach to blindness prevention, briefing paper, Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy, New Delhi
24. Syngenta (nd) http://www.syngenta.com/en/about_syngenta/biotech.asp
25. The Economist (2003) GM crops, Harvest Time, 18 October 2003, 30.
26. The Guardian (2003) Outright ban, caution or green light?, 17 October 2003, 5.
27. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (1997) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change John Wiley & Sons, Chichester UK.
28. Vidal (1999) The Guardian, 06.10.1999.