Sentiment analysis on microblogs for natural disasters management: A study on the 2014 Genoa floodings

WWW 2015 Companion - Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1185-1188

  Buscaldi, Davide ^a   Hernández Farias, Irazú ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISASTER PREVENTION; INFORMATION USE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMMON KNOWLEDGE; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; FLOODINGS; MICROBLOGS; NATURAL DISASTERS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; USE SOCIAL NETWORKS;

DISASTERS;

EID: 84961638139     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2740908.2741727     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani. SentiWordNet 3. 0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In LREC, volume 10, pages 2200-2204, 2010.
2. V. Basile, A. Bolioli, M. Nissim, V. Patti, and P. Rosso. Overview of the Evalita 2014 SENTIment POLarity Classification Task. In Proceedings of the 4th evaluation campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech tools for Italian (EVALITA'14), pages 50-57, Pisa, Italy, 2014.
3. I. Hernández-Farias, D. Buscaldi, and B. Priego-Sanchez. IRADABE: dapting English Lexiconsto the Italian Sentiment Polarity Classification task. In Proceedings of the 4th evaluation campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech tools for Italian (EVALITA'14), pages 75-80, Pisa, Italy, 2014.
4. A. Ihler, J. Hutchins, and P. Smyth. Adaptive event detection with time-varying poisson processes. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 207-216. ACM, 2006.
5. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, pages 56-65. ACM, 2007.
6. R. Lee, S. Wakamiya, and K. Sumiya. Discovery of unusual regional social activities using geo-tagged microblogs. World Wide Web, 14 (4): 321-349, 2011.
7. P. Nakov, Z. Kozareva, A. Ritter, S. Rosenthal, V. Stoyanov, and T. Wilson. Semeval-2013 task 2: Sentiment analysis in twitter. 2013.
8. A. Pak and P. Paroubek. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In LREC, 2010.
9. A. Reyes, P. Rosso, and T. Veale. A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in twitter. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47 (1): 239-268, 2013.
10. B. Robinson, R. Power, and M. Cameron. A Sensitive Twitter Earthquake Detector. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, WWW '13 Companion, pages 999-1002, 2013.
11. S. Rosenthal, P. Nakov, A. Ritter, and V. Stoyanov. Semeval-2014 task 9: Sentiment analysis in twitter. Proc. SemEval, 2014.
12. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 851-860. ACM, 2010.
13. C. Whissell. Using the revised dictionary of affect in language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language 1, 2. Psychological reports, 105 (2): 509-521, 2009.